Community Relations

Building For Growth Leaves Salt Lake’s Unsheltered Out of Equation

As winter approaches what are state and local leaders doing to shelter the unsheltered?

|


If Salt Lake City leaders were merely judged by their words, they would all grade themselves with A’s. But if we evaluate them using numbers, logic and reality, their performance is abysmal.

Salt Lake’s Unsheltered Population Left in Cold Last Winter

Few would doubt that Salt Lake City’s mayor wants to see homeless people out of the cold. Nobody would doubt our State Homeless Coordinator does not want homeless seniors and people with disabilities out of the cold this winter. But the simple fact is that they are failing, and they don’t want to or cannot make available enough warm space to save lives this winter — and learn from their mistakes from last winter — when at least 12 people froze to death.

Sanctioned Campground

A month ago, Mayor Mendenhall and our State Homeless Coordinator, Wayne Neiderhauser, organized a press conference for a huge announcement; it was the culmination of three years of discussion, debate, planning and coordination: “Salt Lake City will have a sanctioned homeless campground!” said Mayor Mendenhall. “A campground where couples, people with pets, and those in the most need will be able to get out of the cold and remain with their loved ones.” 

They had funding for fifty $10,000 “pods” — tiny houses equipped to keep the homeless warm in the winter and cool in the summer. Finally! They offered a grant to operate the campground. They only needed to fulfill an RFP (request for proposal) to find an operator for the campground.

Nobody Qualified to Operate Sanctioned Campground

Today, they claim that they did not find any non-profit entity qualified to operate the campground. Those who claim to care that at least twelve people died last winter don’t quite care enough to make viable policies that align with their words. 

The problem now is that while the city, county, and state are funding 600 more beds for “winter overflow”, according to Wendy Garvin of Unsheltered Utah, this is four hundred beds short of what is required. Instead, these unsheltered people will need to find a way to get a one-way bus ticket elsewhere. 

If we examine city policy and the increasing frequency of homeless abatements, certainly the city hopes the unsheltered get the clear message that this is not the place. The Homeless Information Management System currently reports that all beds are being used in all homeless resource centers, but there are a few people who won’t be standing by watching hundreds of unsheltered homeless freeze in the cold.

Unsheltered Utah

Last winter, a few non-profits, who received little to no taxpayer support operating with volunteers and little money, accomplished what the city, county and state leaders could not — they saved lives by getting unsheltered people out of the cold.

Wendy Garvin, who operates Unsheltered Utah, was one of the main organizers of an effort called Movie Night. Garvin partnered with “Our Unsheltered Relatives — Dave John, and Pandos — Carl Moore along with the First United Methodist Church. The Church agreed to provide the building, while the other non-profits provided donations and support services.

“They deserve all of the credit,” Garvin said on the Utah Stories Podcast. “They deserve all of the credit because they spent all of the late nights and all of the early mornings there taking care of the homeless.” To fully understand this story, we must back up to 2021.

Jared, an unsheltered homeless man, getting warm last February on the Nomad Alliance bus. Jared told Utah Stories he would like to get off the streets and into a job program.
Jared, an unsheltered homeless man, getting warm last February on the Nomad Alliance bus. Jared told Utah Stories he would like to get off the streets and into a job program.

Winter 2020

As winter was approaching in 2020, Mayor Mendenhall, along with the Salt Lake City Council, began feeling overburdened that there were far more unsheltered homeless people than beds. The Council and the Mayor had a session and collectively decided that they were unhappy about the reality of the homeless situation being tossed in their lap. 

In their pity party, they decided to pass a “ … moratorium on building or allowing any more homeless shelters in Salt Lake City.” 

Their decision was to attempt to force other counties and state agencies to step up and build more shelters county-wide. This measure ignored the plight of the unsheltered who gathered in Salt Lake City because that is where most homeless services are offered.

Movie Night Saving Lives

While Garvin doesn’t accept much of the credit, she takes credit for doing something that the city had put a moratorium on allowing — she provided a shelter and prevented people from freezing to death by calling what they were doing a “Movie Night”, ignoring the moratorium, and willfully breaking the law. 

An unsheltered man who goes by “Crash” made it clear how Movie Night saved his life: “I received my tent and sleeping bag, thanks to Ty [Bellamy] (who operates another non-profit called Black Lives for Humanity), but someone stole my blanket and sleeping bag,” Crash told Utah Stories. Without Movie Night, Crash says he would have frozen to death. 

Nomad Alliance

Another non-profit called Nomad Alliance provided basic survival gear to the homeless such as food, provisions and hand sanitizer. The alliance even purchased a bus with a wood-burning stove inside that helped the homeless remain warm. Kseniya Kniazeva is receiving national and international headlines because she went so far as to create a homeless calendar of men without shirts to raise funds for her organization. 

Mismanagement of Ramada Inn

As winter approaches, another blight on the homeless mismanagement is the Ramada Inn — a facility for which developer Keith Warburton was awarded a $2 million grant and a $1.8 million loan for renovation. This facility was supposed to provide more than 400 people with permanent, supportive housing. This task was never accomplished, and Mayor Mendenhall claims she only learned this when the Salt Lake Tribune reported on it at the end of September. 

In their words, they are not to blame, nor is the Utah homeless Coordinator. Money and words aren’t solving the problem. The mismanagement of homeless services is largely neglected by our leaders. State Homeless Coordinator Wayne Neiderhauser receives a salary of more than $258,000 per year. How is he even qualified for this position? 

Neiderhauser won’t answer our questions or call us back. He is an unelected leader not held accountable to the people. Road Home CEO, Michelle Flynn, receives a $150,000 annual salary. She will not answer any questions either because she isn’t elected by voters. 

$89 Million Spent on 10,000 Individuals in 2021

According to Scott Howell of Solutions Utah, $89 million in taxpayer money was spent last year to provide homeless services to around 10,000 individuals. Where did this $89 million go? Who did it benefit? How many homeless lives were improved due to these funds? Neither Neiderhauser nor the Road Home Organization will answer any accountability questions.

Switchpoint

Currently, the only non-profit that is willing to be held accountable for receiving government funding is Switchpoint, led by Carol Hollowell. Switchpoint maintains numbers and key performance indicators regarding their stats. They are, in fact, improving lives through building community, helping those under their care find work, and offering peer-to-peer support.

Featured Image of the Salt Lake City skyline that now includes the tallest building in Utah, the 41-story luxury high-rise Astra Tower, from KIC Utah. The building will soon be offering 377 high-end apartments.

, , ,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Utah Wants Affordable Homes. So Why Did It Kill the Starter Home Bill?

    Utah leaders have spent years talking about affordable housing.

    Governor Spencer Cox has repeatedly emphasized the need for more attainable housing, with a goal of creating tens of thousands of starter homes priced below $300,000. Yet despite broad agreement that housing affordability remains one of the state’s biggest challenges, one proposal designed specifically to encourage the construction of smaller, more affordable single-family homes failed to advance during the most recent legislative session.

    The question raises an uncomfortable issue: if Utah agrees there is a shortage of starter homes, why are those homes still so difficult to build?

    According to attorney and real estate professional Asha Klarich, much of the debate comes down to how communities want to grow and who gets to make those decisions.

    House Bill 184, known as the Small Lots and Starter Homes Amendment, was intended to reduce regulatory barriers and allow smaller homes to be built on smaller lots. The proposal would have created a process for builders and homeowners to seek exceptions to local zoning requirements and construct homes on lots as small as roughly 5,400 square feet.

    The idea was straightforward. Smaller lots generally mean lower land costs. Lower land costs can translate into lower home prices.

    For many first-time buyers, that sounds far more appealing than another apartment building or densely packed townhome development.

    “I think most people would prefer a smaller home on a smaller lot than apartment-style living in a high-rise,” Klarich said during a recent discussion about housing legislation.

    The bill ultimately failed.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • The End of an Era? FanX and the Salt Palace Closure

    For more than a decade, FanX has called the Salt Palace home. With the convention center set to close for a massive renovation, founder Dan Farr is preparing for a new chapter while planning one final celebration in its longtime venue.


  • The Stratos Project and Corporate Power: Who Controls Utah’s Future?

    If we were all just consumers, Governor Cox, Mike Lee, Speaker Schultz, and Kevin O’Leary would have it easy. If we were just more concerned about money, jobs, and tech, and less concerned about raising our kids in communities (not in front of screens), culture, the environment, and water, those smart dudes would get exactly what they want — Stratos: a city of the future, buzzing with processors and transistors, making all of our AI dreams come true! 

    The world we could live in would be a dazzling, Mr. Wonderful kind of place. We would beat those pesky Chinese in the AI war; our AI robots could do all of our farming and ostensibly harvest the water we need for the Great Salt Lake out of thin air. But apparently, we just don’t get it. We haven’t yet reached the point predicted by Aldous Huxley’s vision in Brave New World, where we are completely distracted, dopamine-driven consumers who only need sex, drugs, and stuff to remain happy.

    Maybe Stratos will be an amazing marvel, and somehow, as Governor Cox claims, “. . . add more water to the Great Salt Lake.” But we aren’t sold. While this Stratos project has received considerable attention, it’s worth taking a step back to attempt to understand how corporate power appears to have usurped civic power.

    Civics is the practice of shaping our society through our collective voices and community involvement. Ask the residents in Tremonton, Utah how well that is working out for them. Can we still shape our world through our elected leaders? Does it matter who we vote for at the ballot box if organizations like UDOT, UTA, and MIDA can supersede our local government authority and citizen backlash? 

    The corporatization of our communities and the interests that impact our political leaders’ decision making processes are seen as far more of a concern than the average Utah resident’s concerns. Special interests and corporate power are shaping Utah’s future more than ever. 

    It’s worth asking: ‘How can we regain control over shaping Utah’s future in light of the growing power and billions that the technocrats now wield in shaping our world today?’ Amazon’s market cap exceeds the GDP of Canada. The “Magnificent Seven” tech stocks now have a greater market cap than the entire GDP of Europe ($23.6 trillion. EU countries have $19.3 trillion GDP). Will tech companies become their own nation-states and dominate their own chunks of various states? Will we become their subjects?

    There are two sides to this coin: We love Utah not just because we have the most outdoor wilderness playgrounds, but also because of Utah’s prosperity and job market. This is because Utah has become a tech hub. Our tech leadership has minted several billionaires and billion-dollar businesses. Utah offers a market and an educated workforce that more businesses and giant corporations want to be a part of. This is a benefit for even non-tech Utahns.

    The problem with this success is that as we dole out more money to attract more tech businesses, data centers, fulfillment centers, and big corporate retailers, it becomes more difficult to carve out our “sense of community.” As corporate sovereignty replaces local business sovereignty, we see that our voices and our votes matter less.

    Ask who our politicians work for, and nearly every Utahn believes they work far more for their corporate donors than they work for the average Utah citizen. So how do we best regain control over our communities?

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Utah’s Housing Debate Misses the Question That Matters Most

    A generation ago, homeownership was not reserved for the affluent. Working-class families bought modest homes on modest incomes. They built equity, raised families, and entered retirement with a valuable asset largely paid for.

    Today, many Utah families find themselves in a different position. They may earn too much to qualify for housing assistance but too little to purchase a home. They rent apartments that consume an increasing share of their income while saving for a down payment becomes increasingly difficult.