Community Relations

The Fate of Ogden’s Union Station

A storm brews in Ogden, Utah over what will become of its iconic but neglected Union Station which dates back to 1869.

|


Photos of Ogden Union Station by Jess Knott.

Is the historic building being railroaded?

OGDEN A storm brews in this mountainside city over what will become of its iconic but neglected Union Station.

The original train station at the base of Historic 25th Street dated back to 1869. As train travel expanded, that station gave way to its larger predecessor in 1889, a structure that succumbed to fire in 1923. 

The current building listed on the National Register of Historic Places since 1971 was erected in 1924, and is now in need of significant renovation and restoration.

“There’s been many years of deferred maintenance at Union Station and it definitely needs some love,” Ogden Redevelopment Manager Damen Burnham said recently. “As the city managed the station for the last five years, it invested a substantial amount of money to that end, but it’s definitely going to need further action.”

Big plans underway

In a 104-page document made public in June, Utah Transit Authority and Ogden City unveiled their collaborative effort to redevelop the 8.4-acre Union Station property along with 4.5 acres to the south and 17 acres to the north.

The document describes their vision of a thriving mixed-use neighborhood that would encourage foot traffic as well as public transportation usage. 

Similar to Union Station’s glory days in the mid-20th Century, the new campus would serve as a regional draw where people could work, shop, eat and enjoy “elevated living.”

In mid-October, Burnham said they’d selected a developer but were not yet ready to announce the name.

“We’re still waiting on some agreements,” Burnham said. 

Preserving history

Volunteers who poured their time into keeping the station alive for decades now have significant doubts about whether the station’s character and history can survive such dramatic change.

Steve Jones, chairman of the Golden Spike Railroad Historical Society, voiced mixed feelings about the plans.

“If we look only at the (Union Station) structure, it could be good because there’s been a lot of deferred maintenance,” Jones said. “It needs attention and this may get it some of what it needs.”

But he fears the massive redevelopment could change Ogden forever “and not for the good.” 

“A lot of what emanates out of Union Station … is the culture and feeling that Ogden still remembers its past,” Jones said, noting that could all be erased if preservation efforts fall short.

Museums at risk?

According to the city’s website, the various museums housed in Union Station date back to 1978, thanks in large part to historian Teddy Griffiths.

In 1988, Union Station became the official designation for Utah’s State Railroad Museum, and the building has since acquired a considerable collection. Roughy 25,000 artifacts now reside somewhere in the current structure.

The station also houses the Matthew S. Browning firearms collection, Matthew and Barbara Browning Classic Car Collection and the Floyd Jarvis Utah Railroad Collection. 

To Jones, it makes sense to keep the state Railroad Museum in the existing station, but he said the other museums could benefit from more space and better security.

“So there’s certainly lots of reasons why an expanded museum complex could be very beneficial,” Jones said. “But it needs to be done the right way.”

The current plan would remove all museums from the station, with plans to  eventually put them in a new heritage museum when funding materializes.

But that caveat about funding raises significant concern for Jones, who fears the out-of-sight treasures will ultimately be forgotten and “things will go into storage forever or just disappear.”

Firing the free labor

Theresa Holmes, who has volunteered more than 7,000 hours over 21 years as a Union Station museum docent, fears that systematic dismantling is already under way.

“We’ve worked our butts off to keep the museums going, and then these people fire volunteers,” Holmes said of downsizing she witnessed that included volunteers either being dismissed or getting locked out of their work areas. 

Some exhibits have also been removed and hours of operation have been cut, Holmes added.

But Burnham, a former Union Station manager, countered that he should place a higher priority on preserving the museums and artifacts. 

“Sometimes we have to make decisions for the care of the artifacts that may look like it’s negatively impacting the exhibits. But really everything here is done with that in mind first,” Burnham said.

RELATED CONTENT

A New Several Stories High Apartment Building on Historic 25th Street in Ogden, Utah Ruining Its Charm or Not? Residents Complain.

Ogden’s Food Scene Bolsters Diversity

Secret Tunnels under Ogden’s 25th Street

The Uncertain Future of Ogden’s Marshall White Center

History of Ogden’s 25th Street: Overcoming a Bad Rap

SUPPORT LOCAL JOURNALISM AND SUBSCRIBE TO PRINT MAGAZINE

 

Subscribe to Utah Stories weekly newsletter and get our stories directly to your inbox

* indicates required



 

 

 

 

, , ,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Salt Lake City Newcomers Club: Finding Friendship and Belonging Since 1948

    Moving away from your hometown can come with many blessings. But for some, it also comes with just as many bouts of loneliness. That ache of not knowing where to meet people, or grieving the friends you left behind, comes in waves. Workplaces and churches can sometimes provide ready-made communities, but what happens when they don’t? Where do you go to find true belonging?


  • Can Utahns Still Afford to Have Kids?

    When families cannot afford homes near their jobs, the daily math becomes brutal. Commutes stretch longer. Childcare costs pile up. Mortgages consume more of a household’s income. The result is what economists call “house-poor” families—people who technically own a home but have almost nothing left over to live on.

    The obvious question is: why isn’t this being fixed?


  • A Ski Village or a Tipping Point? Nordic Valley Expansion Divides Ogden Valley

    The project, known as Nordic Village, is expected to roll out over the next decade and represents one of the largest tourism developments in the valley’s history.


  • The Stratos Project Was Already Approved. So Why the Public Meeting?

    Thousands showed up to protest. The decision may have already been made.

    When thousands of Box Elder County residents packed the fairgrounds to protest the proposed 40,000-acre Stratos data center, they thought they were confronting the people in charge.

    They weren’t.

    The county commissioners stood at the front of the room, absorbing the anger, the frustration, the disbelief. They looked like decision-makers. But by their own account, they weren’t.

    Because the decision may have already been made—long before the public ever showed up.

    The Illusion of Authority

    What happened at that meeting wasn’t civic engagement. It was something closer to theater.

    No meaningful public comment. No real debate. No clear path for residents to influence the outcome. Just a room full of people reacting to a project that, structurally, may already be locked in.

    Why?

    Because the real authority doesn’t sit with Box Elder County.

    It sits with the Utah Military Installation Development Authority.

    Once MIDA designates a project area, the rules change. Local zoning can become irrelevant. Private land stays private. Water rights remain private. And the role of local government shifts from decision-maker to facilitator.

    In plain terms: the county doesn’t decide if the project happens. It helps manage how it happens.

    So when residents showed up demanding answers, they were asking the wrong people.

    A Process That Skips the Public

    That should concern anyone paying attention.

    Because it flips the normal order of things. Instead of:

    Proposal → Public input → Decision

    We get:

    Decision → Public meeting → Reaction

    And by the time the public enters the room, the real levers of power have already been pulled.

    So what exactly was that meeting?

    If commissioners don’t have authority to stop the project, then the meeting wasn’t about deciding anything. It was about absorbing pressure. Managing optics. Creating the appearance of a process that had already moved on.

    That’s not transparency. That’s choreography.

    Follow the Missing Pieces