Podcast

Can Accountability Break the Cycle of Crime?

Crime entered his life before hard drugs did. As a teenager he stole cars, sold marijuana at school and repeatedly encountered law enforcement. By the age of fourteen he was committed to California’s youth correctional system, where he remained until shortly before turning eighteen. Instead of changing his life, the experience pushed him further into…

|

Joel Haddock shares how accountability and long-term rehabilitation helped him break the cycle of crime during a Utah Stories podcast recording.

Every week, Joel Haddock meets people standing where he once stood.

Some are facing lengthy prison sentences. Others have spent years cycling through the criminal justice system, convinced that incarceration is simply part of who they are. As a member of the legal and admissions team at The Other Side Academy in Salt Lake City, Haddock helps them navigate the process of entering the long-term rehabilitation program that transformed his own life.

There was a time when he never imagined he would be helping others find a different path. He believed prison was his future because, for most of his life, it had been his reality.

After pleading guilty to nine felony charges, most of them second-degree felonies, Haddock faced what amounted to decades behind bars. A district court judge suspended those prison sentences on one condition: complete The Other Side Academy. If he failed, he would serve every one of those consecutive sentences.

At first, the Academy represented little more than a way to avoid prison.

“It was the deal of a lifetime,” Haddock says.

His motivation had nothing to do with personal growth. He simply wanted to stay out of prison. But about fifteen months into the Academy’s thirty-month program, something unexpected happened.

“I noticed the way I saw things was different,” he says. “How I reacted to situations was different. I liked who I’d become.”

For Haddock, that realization marked the first time he truly believed his life could be different.

His journey toward crime began long before adulthood. He grew up in a home where instability was the norm. Drugs, criminal behavior, neglect and physical abuse surrounded his childhood. His family moved frequently, leaving little consistency at school or at home. His mother struggled with addiction, while his father worked odd jobs whenever he could. Safe, dependable role models were scarce.

“I had nothing stable when I was younger,” he says.

Crime entered his life before hard drugs did. As a teenager he stole cars, sold marijuana at school and repeatedly encountered law enforcement. By the age of fourteen he was committed to California’s youth correctional system, where he remained until shortly before turning eighteen.

Instead of changing his life, the experience pushed him further into criminal culture.

Surrounded by older, more experienced offenders, he learned how to survive inside the system rather than outside it. Looking back, he believes the correctional system gave him plenty of time to become a better criminal but very little opportunity to become a better person.

After his release, methamphetamine entered the picture, followed by years of adult incarceration in Nevada and Utah. The cycle became painfully familiar. Prison. Release. A job. A brief attempt at rebuilding life. Then the inevitable collapse.

Haddock describes reaching what he now calls “the edge of my ability.”

He could find work. He could earn money. But he had never learned how to manage relationships, resolve conflict, make sound decisions or build a stable life. When those challenges appeared, crime was the only solution he knew.

That realization shaped the way he views rehabilitation today.

Haddock believes many treatment programs are designed for people whose lives are fundamentally intact—people who have families, careers and homes but need help overcoming substance abuse. His life looked very different. By the time he entered The Other Side Academy, addiction was only one piece of a much larger problem.

“I needed to completely change who I’d become,” he says. “It wasn’t going to take ninety days.”

He believes long-term accountability—not simply therapy or detox—made the difference. Day after day, residents learn to resolve conflict, communicate honestly, accept criticism, work consistently and take responsibility for one another. Over time, those habits become part of everyday life rather than lessons learned in a classroom.

For Haddock, the Academy taught something prison never did: how to live.

Equally important was discovering a sense of dignity.

The Other Side Academy supports itself through businesses operated by participants rather than government funding or insurance reimbursements. Contributing to his own recovery fundamentally changed how Haddock viewed himself.

“I found a lot of dignity,” he says. “I found a lot of self-respect.”

Instead of seeing himself as another burden on taxpayers or his family, he began taking ownership of the damage he had caused.

“I am the problem,” he says. “And I get to fix it.”

His perspective on addiction was shaped not only by his own experiences but also by tragedy within his family.

His sister struggled for years with schizophrenia, addiction and homelessness in Las Vegas. Haddock repeatedly encouraged her to enter treatment, and organizations working with the homeless tried to help her as well. She left treatment programs more than once before eventually dying from an overdose.

Haddock was able to travel to Las Vegas before she passed away and later arranged her cremation. The experience reinforced a painful lesson that continues to guide the advice he gives families.

No matter how much someone is loved, recovery cannot be forced.

Because of that, Haddock encourages families to avoid enabling addiction by providing money or temporary solutions that allow destructive behavior to continue. Instead, he believes they should offer treatment resources while leaving the responsibility for accepting help where it belongs.

“They really do have to want it,” he says.

Those same beliefs influence how he views Utah’s broader struggles with homelessness and recidivism.

Haddock does not believe housing alone changes lives. Without accountability and the skills necessary to maintain stability, he fears many people simply carry the same destructive behaviors into a different setting. Lasting change, he believes, comes from combining compassion with expectations, helping people develop the ability to support themselves rather than simply providing services.

“I think we need to meet this problem with more expectations,” he says.

Today, Haddock hopes Utah expands opportunities for incarcerated individuals to enter long-term rehabilitation before completing their prison sentences. He believes programs like The Other Side Academy can reduce recidivism by addressing the problems prison often leaves untouched—character, accountability and the practical skills required to live a productive life.

Looking back, Haddock no longer measures success by the prison sentence he avoided. He measures it by the person he became after accepting responsibility for the life he had created. For years he believed freedom meant getting out of prison. Today, he sees it differently. Freedom came only after learning how to live outside the walls that had defined him for so long.

, , ,

Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Cottonwood Heights Corruption Allegations: A Case That Never Reached a Courtroom

    A year ago, we here at Utah Stories recorded a podcast episode that we never published. We were revisiting corruption allegations from ten years ago. We decided not to publish the video, so it sat there on YouTube for nearly 12 months.

    Then somehow the video was published. How? We are not sure, but once it got out there, the comments came pouring in.

    Dozens of viewers, then hundreds, supported the video with their comments on our examination of allegations of police misconduct in Cottonwood Heights. The video recounts how the Police Department was reported by business owners as focusing enforcement on customers of the former Canyon Inn bar. These allegations did not result in a publicly documented, full investigation by Utah’s Justice Department nor the FBI (at least to our knowledge). So why rehash the past?

    We believe the story of The Canyon Inn (and other area business owners) vs. CHPD and Cottonwood Heights Mayor Kelvin Cullimore raises questions about what can happen when allegations surface and do not move forward through a formal legal process with state or federal oversight.

    In 2012, Cottonwood Heights business owners at the mouth of the canyons began publicly objecting to police activity whereby up to seven cruisers were pulling over 711 and Canyon Inn bar customers on their busiest evenings.

    According to those accounts, drivers leaving the bar were frequently pulled over by police and were given DUI tickets, sometimes even after passing a sobriety examination. The volume and concentration of those stops led residents and business owners to complain about the “heavy-handed treatment” of CHPD toward motorists, especially in and around the Canyon Inn and neighboring 711, and eventually the Porcupine Pub.

    Customers responded in predictable ways. Some chose not to return and avoid the area. Others went to different establishments. Over time, the owner of the Canyon Inn, Jim Stojack, stated that his revenue declined by 70% and that he believed police activity near his business was the main contributing factor.

    Utah Stories reported on these concerns by conducting interviews; gathering video documentation provided by those involved; and making public records requests. Through our GRAMA requests, we reviewed DUI citations issued by the Cottonwood Heights Police Department and examined how those cases were resolved in Holladay Justice Court. During that period, we observed a higher number based on our review of DUI cases dismissed in court due to lack of evidence compared to other jurisdictions. One DUI attorney, Tyler Ayers, went on record saying that CHPD was issuing a high volume of DUI citations that were later dismissed.

    That observation raised questions about how cases were being documented and prosecuted. It did not, on its own, establish intent or misconduct, but it became part of a broader set of concerns raised by multiple sources.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • From LDS Mission to Heroin Addiction: A Utah Man’s Descent and Recovery

    More than 100,000 Americans died from drug overdoses in a single year. That number is often repeated, rarely absorbed, and almost never understood in a way that forces real reflection. Because addiction doesn’t usually look like chaos at the beginning.


  • The Perfect Girls’ Day in Park City: Brunch, Shopping, Spas & Nightlife

    After a week of work, grocery shopping, meal prep, driving the kids around, housework and last minute emergencies, a day of bonding and fun with our BFF’s is just what the doctor ordered. Fortunately, one of the best getaways is just a short drive away to Park City.


  • The Stratos Project Was Already Approved. So Why the Public Meeting?

    Thousands showed up to protest. The decision may have already been made.

    When thousands of Box Elder County residents packed the fairgrounds to protest the proposed 40,000-acre Stratos data center, they thought they were confronting the people in charge.

    They weren’t.

    The county commissioners stood at the front of the room, absorbing the anger, the frustration, the disbelief. They looked like decision-makers. But by their own account, they weren’t.

    Because the decision may have already been made—long before the public ever showed up.

    The Illusion of Authority

    What happened at that meeting wasn’t civic engagement. It was something closer to theater.

    No meaningful public comment. No real debate. No clear path for residents to influence the outcome. Just a room full of people reacting to a project that, structurally, may already be locked in.

    Why?

    Because the real authority doesn’t sit with Box Elder County.

    It sits with the Utah Military Installation Development Authority.

    Once MIDA designates a project area, the rules change. Local zoning can become irrelevant. Private land stays private. Water rights remain private. And the role of local government shifts from decision-maker to facilitator.

    In plain terms: the county doesn’t decide if the project happens. It helps manage how it happens.

    So when residents showed up demanding answers, they were asking the wrong people.

    A Process That Skips the Public

    That should concern anyone paying attention.

    Because it flips the normal order of things. Instead of:

    Proposal → Public input → Decision

    We get:

    Decision → Public meeting → Reaction

    And by the time the public enters the room, the real levers of power have already been pulled.

    So what exactly was that meeting?

    If commissioners don’t have authority to stop the project, then the meeting wasn’t about deciding anything. It was about absorbing pressure. Managing optics. Creating the appearance of a process that had already moved on.

    That’s not transparency. That’s choreography.

    Follow the Missing Pieces