satire

Salt Lake Man’s Rooster Crisis Derails Backyard Farm Plan

A suburban man’s off-grid dreams spiraled into chaos when his backyard chicken project turned into a full-blown rooster uprising forcing his vegan wife to call an animal sanctuary.

|

Salt Lake man feeds chicken in his backyard.

Vegan wife calls animal sanctuary after backyard self-reliance experiment turns into suburban bird crisis.

MURRAY, UT — After months of watching YouTube videos of men building log cabins with hand tools and smoking deer meat over open fires, Bryce Hamilton decided it was time to live off the land. He started by selling his Sugar House bungalow.

“My ancestors didn’t have central air,” said Hamilton. “They had no running water. They were tough. They survived on root vegetables. And they didn’t rely on Costco.”

In January, Hamilton relocated to a half-acre lot in Murray, into what he proudly calls a “barn-style homestead.” His wife, Allison — a proud vegan and animal rights advocate — was less enthusiastic about the barn aesthetic and even less excited about the chickens. She called it capitalistic exploitation of chickens.

“She wanted to stay in Sugar House. I wanted to grow potatoes and not rely on grocery stores run by corporations,” Bryce explained. “Compromise is the cornerstone of marriage.”

The “barnstead,” as Bryce dubbed it, quickly filled with raised garden beds, a homemade compost system, and jars to pickle vegetables no one asked for. But Bryce’s real dream was protein self-sufficiency. Enter the chicken project.

In March, Hamilton drove to a local farm supply store and returned with eleven baby chicks, confidently stating they were “all hens,” per the word of a teenager named Tanner who “seemed trustworthy.”

For three months, the chickens flourished in a coop Bryce designed and built based on YouTube videos. But by early June, the truth began to crow . Loudly.

Nine of the eleven chickens were roosters.

“It started at 5am,” said neighbor Kathy Holmstead. “One would crow, then another. Then all nine joined in like it was some kind of feathered choir from hell.”

The noise became unbearable. Neighbors filed complaints. One man attempted to drown out the birds by blasting smooth jazz from his garage. Police were called twice.

Under pressure from the neighborhood and with a fridge still devoid of eggs Bryce made a decision: the roosters had to go. And not to a new home.

“I figured if I raised them, I could harvest them,” he said. “That’s how the system is supposed to work. Circle of life. No waste.”

Allison was horrified.

“He wanted to slaughter them,” she said. “This is murder, not harvest. We harvest vegetables. These birds had names. I crocheted them little scarves for winter.”

A standoff ensued. Bryce stood in the garden holding a hatchet. Allison held her phone, threatening to call Feathered Hope Animal Sanctuary.

Within hours, rescue volunteers arrived and began transporting the roosters into crates, as one protestor in a chicken costume stood on the sidewalk holding a sign that read, Roosters are Chickens Too.

The story quickly spread on social media under the hashtag #RoosterGateMurray, and animal rights groups praised Allison’s quick action. Bryce, meanwhile, was issued a formal warning by the city for “noise violations and intent for unsanctioned poultry processing.”

“I’m not anti-self-reliant,” Allison told reporters. “I just don’t want to live in a horror film splattered with the blood of innocent creatures!”

The eight rescued roosters now reside at a sanctuary in Moab. The remaining rooster, named Buckminster, has been fitted with a no-crow collar and now sleeps indoors in Allison’s separate bedroom.

As for Bryce, he says he’s moving on from chickens.

“I’ve been looking into goats,” he said. “Milk, meat, land management. Way more sustainable.” U

*Photo by Heinz Klier

*Editor’s Note: This article is a work of satire and is intended for entertainment and commentary purposes only. While it may reference real places or echo real events, the characters and situations are fictionalized for humor and reflection. At Utah Stories, we believe that sometimes the absurd reveals more truth than the facts alone.

,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • The $7 Million Recruit: How NIL Changed College Athletics Forever

    In 2012, Jabari Parker, a top high school prospect and member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was facing his biggest decision to that point in his life: where to play college basketball. 

    Fans of BYU athletics hoped and perhaps prayed that Parker would pick the school owned by the church he was raised in. BYU was listed as one of his final choices. But he ultimately chose to spend his college years at Duke before attempting a career in the NBA. BYU fans were disappointed, but no one was truly surprised. Duke over BYU was the best choice for a young prospect in 2012. 

    A.J. Dybantsa.

    What changed between 2012 and 2024 when A.J. Dybantsa, the number one high school prospect, chose BYU over every other school? The answer is roughly $7 million dollars. That is what Dybantsa is reportedly making to play basketball at BYU. 

    The deal was supported by Utah Jazz owner Ryan Smith, who met multiple times with the Dybantsa family in multiple attempts to bring the young player to Provo. 

    According to Smith, he had no financial role in bringing Dybantsa to BYU, but the influence of Utah’s most famous billionaire acting as a “booster” or unofficial recruiter certainly swayed the decision.

    Prior to 2021, boosters acting as recruiters was taboo to the NCAA governing body. It was called improper recruiting. But in 2021, California began the modern era of NIL, or the ability of a college athlete to benefit from their name, image, or likeness, when they passed the “Fair Pay to Play Act.” 

    This new law gave college athletes in California the ability to benefit from their NIL, something that was banned in the rest of the country to that point. The NCAA saw that this law would create an unfair advantage for California schools that could now give young athletes the chance to make money off their talent and image while still in college. 

    The NCAA knew they needed to do something quickly, so they rushed through a policy that opened up NIL to all college athletes in the country, and it has been expanding and evolving over the last four years. 

    Grant Duff, who has coached at the University of Utah, Weber State University, and is now the defensive coordinator for Idaho State University, says, “The best part of NIL is that athletes have an opportunity to make good money. The downside comes with the free-for-all that money causes.”

    Dybantsa confers with BYU Head coach, Kevin Young.

    One of the biggest current examples of what a school can do when the boosters are willing to pay for success is Texas Tech University. From 2020-2024, Texas Tech had 34 wins, which works out to 6.8 wins per year with a low of 4 wins and high of 8. Then Texas Tech’s boosters got involved, led by Cody Campbell, an oil industry businessman and Chairman of the Texas Tech board. The football program was given 28 million dollars for NIL with a simple message attached to the large pile of money: Win. And win now. And win they did. 

    By signing NIL deals with athletes in the transfer portal, Texas Tech went from a middle-of-the-pack school in their conference to one of the top 12 teams in the country. They didn’t just win games in 2025, they made many of their opponents look like they didn’t belong on the same field, including the University of Utah and BYU twice. That is what money can buy.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Why Did Salt Lake City Tear Down Its Most Beautiful Buildings?

    If you go into the Utah State Archives and spend time with photographs from the late 1800s and early 1900s, you start to notice something that doesn’t line up with what exists today.

    Main Street looks cohesive. Not in a uniform way, but in a way that suggests the people building it shared an understanding of proportion, material, and permanence. Four-story buildings line the street—stone, brick, cast iron—each one detailed in ways that don’t feel incidental. Arched windows, carved stone, brickwork that changes pattern as it rises. Even the cast iron facades were designed to replicate masonry, not hide behind it.

    Then you go downtown and try to find those same buildings.

    Most of them are gone.

    Out of more than 400 buildings designed by Richard Kletting, over 300 have been torn down. That number alone reframes the conversation. Kletting designed the Utah State Capitol, the Saltair resort, commercial buildings, schools, churches, mansions—virtually every type of structure…

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Momomaru Sushi Review: Salt Lake City’s New Destination for Japanese Hand Rolls

    A new Salt Lake City sushi spot is drawing crowds with Japanese-style hand rolls served fresh, fast, and warm, offering a more intimate and interactive take on traditional sushi.


  • The Stratos Project Was Already Approved. So Why the Public Meeting?

    Thousands showed up to protest. The decision may have already been made.

    When thousands of Box Elder County residents packed the fairgrounds to protest the proposed 40,000-acre Stratos data center, they thought they were confronting the people in charge.

    They weren’t.

    The county commissioners stood at the front of the room, absorbing the anger, the frustration, the disbelief. They looked like decision-makers. But by their own account, they weren’t.

    Because the decision may have already been made—long before the public ever showed up.

    The Illusion of Authority

    What happened at that meeting wasn’t civic engagement. It was something closer to theater.

    No meaningful public comment. No real debate. No clear path for residents to influence the outcome. Just a room full of people reacting to a project that, structurally, may already be locked in.

    Why?

    Because the real authority doesn’t sit with Box Elder County.

    It sits with the Utah Military Installation Development Authority.

    Once MIDA designates a project area, the rules change. Local zoning can become irrelevant. Private land stays private. Water rights remain private. And the role of local government shifts from decision-maker to facilitator.

    In plain terms: the county doesn’t decide if the project happens. It helps manage how it happens.

    So when residents showed up demanding answers, they were asking the wrong people.

    A Process That Skips the Public

    That should concern anyone paying attention.

    Because it flips the normal order of things. Instead of:

    Proposal → Public input → Decision

    We get:

    Decision → Public meeting → Reaction

    And by the time the public enters the room, the real levers of power have already been pulled.

    So what exactly was that meeting?

    If commissioners don’t have authority to stop the project, then the meeting wasn’t about deciding anything. It was about absorbing pressure. Managing optics. Creating the appearance of a process that had already moved on.

    That’s not transparency. That’s choreography.

    Follow the Missing Pieces