Sundance Film Festival

How To Have Sex, Interview with The Director Molly Manning Walker

Utah Stories talks to the director and writer of the film How To Have Sex (shown at Sundance 2024), Molly Manning Walker. 

|


How To Have Sex follows three young British women on their holiday of drinking, hooking up, and partying. One of them, Tara, played by Mia McKenna-Bruce, gets into some sticky situations along the way, causing her to grapple with issues of consent, trauma, and confusion. 

Utah Stories had the pleasure of speaking with the director and writer of the film, Molly Manning Walker. 

I saw that this film was written based on personal experience, and it resonated with me. How does it feel to resonate with so many young people?

“Yeah, it’s been really special,” Walker said. “It’s both incredibly disturbing that so many are affected by the same topic and also quite empowering that you feel like you’re part of an army in some cases. And that everyone kind of feels as passionate about it as you. It’s been complicated because as much as you want to open up the conversation and get people talking about it, it’s also not the easiest topic to talk about. It’s been a navigated ride.” 

The part of the film that impressed me most was Tara’s shift from after the beach incident. It was exactly how “beach incidents” affect people in real life. In the writing and directing, did you intentionally plan for that shift in Tara? 

“Yeah totally. It was interesting to see how people kind of understood what the beach scene was, and for me it was always talking about the complication of assault and situations where even though someone said yes, they don’t want it to happen. I think that scene always stands out amongst how people read the film.” 

The subtleties in the movie were noticeable. For example, how Badger tucks Tara into bed. Were all those subtleties intentional? 

“I think Badger was always meant to be this character that men recognize themselves in. He’s kind of softer and more loving but also fails her by not standing up at the right time and not saying something when he knows his friend’s done something bad. I guess the plan was always to make everyone very three-dimensional, and everyone has their downfalls as well as their positives and it’s complicated like life is.” 

What do you want people to take away from this film? Is there a message you’d like to convey about consent? 

“I guess to understand that consent is never going to be this binary thing that is yes or no. Or that we have to engage with people and understand what other people are going through and it has to feel like a positive experience. That’s something that’s really important to me. It was always the plan to talk about how we learned how to have sex wrong. And how consent is always talked about in this super violent way when actually I think we need to start talking about it in a more subtle way.”  

When going into writing the film did you have an idea of how it would go, or did unexpected things occur in the process? 

“Quite unexpected things. I mean, it was a very chaotic process of writing. It was always the plan to talk about an assault which someone has said yes to, but is coerced into, and the complications of that.” 

What was the process of selecting the songs for the movie? 
“It was a big collaboration between me, the editor, and the composer. And the editor had really great ideas about songs, and the composer is a DJ who toured around [the areas where the film was filmed]. So often we couldn’t afford a song and he’d make something that was in a similar energy. We were really lucky to come in under budget on the shoot so we had a bit more money to play with on the soundtrack, which I think goes a long way in selling the atmosphere of the place,” Walker said. 

,

Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Left in a Box as a Baby: Trauma, Alcoholism, and Addiction

    A man abandoned as a baby builds a structured life in law enforcement, but unresolved trauma and alcoholism slowly begin to unravel it. His story raises a harder question about how change actually happens.


  • Cottonwood Heights Corruption Allegations: A Case That Never Reached a Courtroom

    A year ago, we here at Utah Stories recorded a podcast episode that we never published. We were revisiting corruption allegations from ten years ago. We decided not to publish the video, so it sat there on YouTube for nearly 12 months.

    Then somehow the video was published. How? We are not sure, but once it got out there, the comments came pouring in.

    Dozens of viewers, then hundreds, supported the video with their comments on our examination of allegations of police misconduct in Cottonwood Heights. The video recounts how the Police Department was reported by business owners as focusing enforcement on customers of the former Canyon Inn bar. These allegations did not result in a publicly documented, full investigation by Utah’s Justice Department nor the FBI (at least to our knowledge). So why rehash the past?

    We believe the story of The Canyon Inn (and other area business owners) vs. CHPD and Cottonwood Heights Mayor Kelvin Cullimore raises questions about what can happen when allegations surface and do not move forward through a formal legal process with state or federal oversight.

    In 2012, Cottonwood Heights business owners at the mouth of the canyons began publicly objecting to police activity whereby up to seven cruisers were pulling over 711 and Canyon Inn bar customers on their busiest evenings.

    According to those accounts, drivers leaving the bar were frequently pulled over by police and were given DUI tickets, sometimes even after passing a sobriety examination. The volume and concentration of those stops led residents and business owners to complain about the “heavy-handed treatment” of CHPD toward motorists, especially in and around the Canyon Inn and neighboring 711, and eventually the Porcupine Pub.

    Customers responded in predictable ways. Some chose not to return and avoid the area. Others went to different establishments. Over time, the owner of the Canyon Inn, Jim Stojack, stated that his revenue declined by 70% and that he believed police activity near his business was the main contributing factor.

    Utah Stories reported on these concerns by conducting interviews; gathering video documentation provided by those involved; and making public records requests. Through our GRAMA requests, we reviewed DUI citations issued by the Cottonwood Heights Police Department and examined how those cases were resolved in Holladay Justice Court. During that period, we observed a higher number based on our review of DUI cases dismissed in court due to lack of evidence compared to other jurisdictions. One DUI attorney, Tyler Ayers, went on record saying that CHPD was issuing a high volume of DUI citations that were later dismissed.

    That observation raised questions about how cases were being documented and prosecuted. It did not, on its own, establish intent or misconduct, but it became part of a broader set of concerns raised by multiple sources.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • The Perfect Girls’ Day in Park City: Brunch, Shopping, Spas & Nightlife

    After a week of work, grocery shopping, meal prep, driving the kids around, housework and last minute emergencies, a day of bonding and fun with our BFF’s is just what the doctor ordered. Fortunately, one of the best getaways is just a short drive away to Park City.


  • The Stratos Project Was Already Approved. So Why the Public Meeting?

    Thousands showed up to protest. The decision may have already been made.

    When thousands of Box Elder County residents packed the fairgrounds to protest the proposed 40,000-acre Stratos data center, they thought they were confronting the people in charge.

    They weren’t.

    The county commissioners stood at the front of the room, absorbing the anger, the frustration, the disbelief. They looked like decision-makers. But by their own account, they weren’t.

    Because the decision may have already been made—long before the public ever showed up.

    The Illusion of Authority

    What happened at that meeting wasn’t civic engagement. It was something closer to theater.

    No meaningful public comment. No real debate. No clear path for residents to influence the outcome. Just a room full of people reacting to a project that, structurally, may already be locked in.

    Why?

    Because the real authority doesn’t sit with Box Elder County.

    It sits with the Utah Military Installation Development Authority.

    Once MIDA designates a project area, the rules change. Local zoning can become irrelevant. Private land stays private. Water rights remain private. And the role of local government shifts from decision-maker to facilitator.

    In plain terms: the county doesn’t decide if the project happens. It helps manage how it happens.

    So when residents showed up demanding answers, they were asking the wrong people.

    A Process That Skips the Public

    That should concern anyone paying attention.

    Because it flips the normal order of things. Instead of:

    Proposal → Public input → Decision

    We get:

    Decision → Public meeting → Reaction

    And by the time the public enters the room, the real levers of power have already been pulled.

    So what exactly was that meeting?

    If commissioners don’t have authority to stop the project, then the meeting wasn’t about deciding anything. It was about absorbing pressure. Managing optics. Creating the appearance of a process that had already moved on.

    That’s not transparency. That’s choreography.

    Follow the Missing Pieces