Community Relations

Endangering Wildlife to Widen a State Road to Park City

SR 224 ranks 5th in the state of the top 25 animal and wildlife crash hotspots. The solution has proven elusive.

|


PARK CITY – A 7.5-mile stretch of State Road 224 (SR 224) between Kimball Junction and Park City is slated for Bus Rapid Transit, a $67 million project to help move residents and tourists throughout the scenic resort area more efficiently. But widening the busy four-lane road is expected to further endanger wildlife that already struggle to survive.

According to a December 2019 report prepared for the Utah Department of Transportation, this portion of SR 224 ranks fifth on the state’s list of top 25 animal- and wildlife-crash hotspots.

Caroline Rodriquez, executive director of High Valley Transit in Summit County, said much of the BRT modifications will take place within the existing 100-foot-wide road – but paved bike and breakdown lanes will add six to 12 feet on either side.

The project website, SR224BRT.com, estimates a 24-month construction period to install roadway improvements, which Rodriguez expects will reach completion in early 2026. 

The project received a Categorical Exclusion (CatEx) to determine its eligibility for federal transit funding – which the Federal Transit Administration defines as a “category of actions that, based on FTA’s experience with similar actions, do not involve significant environmental impacts.”  

To Rodriguez, that translated to “no adverse impacts (to wildlife) requiring mitigation” under the federal guidelines.

But the 31-page CatEx worksheet acknowledged that “because the Project would widen the SR 224 roadway, the number of wildlife-vehicle collisions could increase.” 

Faith Jolley, spokesperson for Utah’s Division of Wildlife, said they’re currently working with local groups and stakeholders to evaluate wildlife impacts and possible mitigation efforts along the route. 

“This is a complex situation, and whenever there is increased urban sprawl in wildlife habitat areas, there are many factors to consider regarding the best solutions for the wildlife,” Jolley said by email.

Photo of police stopping traffic to let an elk cross this busy section of the highway. Photo by Lorelei Combs.

Fighting for wildlife

Erin Ferguson, president of Save People Save Wildlife, said the nonprofit hoped to help shape the SR 224 BRT project so that wildlife could traverse their habitat without colliding with cars.

 “We’ve been trying for three years to get a seat at the table,” Feguson said. “They’ve effectively shut the door on us,”

In a recent interview, she voiced her concerns about the two-year construction phase: “If you have equipment out here doing the BRT lanes and widening the road … it’s already impermeable to wildlife. So it’s going to just be a slaughter.”

Ferguson had hoped that wildlife connectivity components – including an overpass or underpass crossing, fencing and cattle guards – could be included in the design process for SR 224 BRT. But so far that hasn’t happened. 

“Animals are getting hit way too frequently on this highway. It’s not only a danger to them, it’s also a public safety concern,” Ferguson said, noting that SPSW members have repeatedly reached out to Summit County and Park City leaders, along with the major stakeholders – but to no avail.

A busy section of SR 224 where wildlife have to navigate in traffic. Photo by Shauna Hart for SPSW.

Prioritizing the work?

Kylar Sharp, Utah Department of Transportation Region 2 spokesperson, said they’re constantly seeking wildlife safety solutions.

“We put up wildlife fencing and Reduce Speed Limit signs in certain areas,” Sharp said. In addition, they’ve been meeting monthly with Save People Save Wildlife to discuss potential fixes.

Geoff Dupaix said his job as UDOT planning manager is both data-driven and fueled by community input.

Dupaix recently applied for a $14.5 million federal grant to help fund a $26.5 million project near Echo Reservoir and the junction of Interstates 80 and 84. He expects a response in early 2024.

The state already committed about $12 million toward the 21-mile Echo Junction project that includes three potential wildlife crossings, fencing and escape ramps between Peterson and Echo Junction.

Closer to SR 224 – Dupais said they’re installing more wildlife fencing along I-80 near Kimball Junction. 

“It’s important to take a more holistic approach to identify those key (wildlife migration) areas,” Dupaix said. “The data shows that wildlife are more apt to cross the road at Echo Junction. That’s why we’re giving it more attention right now.”

But UDOT’s 2019 wildlife-vehicle collision report ranked the Echo Junction area 18th among the state’s top 25 highways for such crashes.

That report logged 2.97 wildlife-vehicle crashes per mile per year on the SR 224 stretch compared to 2.32 in the Echo Junction area.

Bureaucratic indifference

Park City and Summit County spokespeople said their elected officials participate in the SR 224 BRT process but not as major stakeholders. Their role has mainly been to listen and convey community concerns. 

But discussions stalled between the city and Save People Save Wildlife as indicated by a January 2023 email from Park City Mayor Nann Worel, that the nonprofit’s suggestion to build a wildlife tunnel under SR 224 had been shelved because the “Council prefers to focus on other priorities” at this time.

Featured image by Shauna Hart for SPSW.

, , ,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Has Utah’s Soft-on-Crime Justice Reform Made Communities Safer?

    Has this “soft-on-crime” approach resulted in safer streets?

    SALT LAKE CITY — A decade has passed since former Utah Governor Gary Herbert signed a massive justice reform bill into law in hopes that the state could reduce its prison population and manage low-level offenders through rehabilitation programs instead of incarceration. Has this reinvestment resulted in lower crime and recidivism rates?

    According to the Utah Department of Corrections, that landmark Justice Reinvestment Initiative aimed to “continue holding offenders accountable and securing our communities, but in a way that considers individual risks and treatment needs.”

    Are communities really safer when mental health and substance use needs are addressed through programs administered outside prison walls? The idea was to treat criminals differently based on their mental health needs and backgrounds. But at least one retired Adult Probation and Parole Officer, believes this “soft-on-crime” approach hasn’t resulted in safer streets.

    LOOKING BACK

    State Senator Todd Weiler, in that legislative role since 2012, helped drive the passage of the Justice Reinvestment Initiative (JRI), a massive bill that enjoyed broad-based approval among state officials and the Legislature as a whole.

    In November 2014, Weiler attended the national summit on the issue in San Diego, an event hosted by Pew Charitable Trusts. 

    “I was very involved in it. We had a lot of high hopes,” Weiler, a Woods Cross Republican, said in a recent interview. “That was about the time we were finalizing plans for the new prison. And we actually said that because of JRI we don’t need as many beds because we’ll be incarcerating fewer people. So that new prison was designed with this idea.”

    A key part of JRI dealt with adjusting sentencing for crimes related to addiction, dividing offenders into two basic groups: dangerous criminals who are a threat to society (that group goes to prison), and low-level offenders who get help kicking addictions through state-sponsored programs or private-sector rehabilitation.

    “The ultimate goal was if we have an otherwise good person who got caught up in an addiction, and as a result committed crimes, they need to be punished for their crimes,” Weiler said. “It’s not that we’re going to overlook what they did, but we wanted to focus primarily on helping them overcome their addiction and [that means] getting them back to their job and their family.” 

    Before JRI, low-level drug offenders with felonies would spend years in prison, which wreaked havoc with their lives and future prospects. Addressing the root cause of their theft and property crimes through supervision and treatment made sense. 

    “We’re all imperfect people,” Weiler said. “So we want people working their jobs, paying their bills and raising their kids rather than sitting in jail and watching TV or playing cards.”

    To access this post, you must purchase Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Salt Lake City Newcomers Club: Finding Friendship and Belonging Since 1948

    Moving away from your hometown can come with many blessings. But for some, it also comes with just as many bouts of loneliness. That ache of not knowing where to meet people, or grieving the friends you left behind, comes in waves. Workplaces and churches can sometimes provide ready-made communities, but what happens when they don’t? Where do you go to find true belonging?


  • US Magnesium Bankruptcy and the Environmental Cost to the Great Salt Lake

    Now, with US Magnesium declaring bankruptcy, questions long deferred are rising to the surface. What happens to decades of toxic waste sitting just miles from a shrinking lake? Who is responsible for cleaning it up? And what does it mean for the communities who breathe the dust when the wind lifts off the exposed lakebed?


  • Can Utahns Still Afford to Have Kids?

    When families cannot afford homes near their jobs, the daily math becomes brutal. Commutes stretch longer. Childcare costs pile up. Mortgages consume more of a household’s income. The result is what economists call “house-poor” families—people who technically own a home but have almost nothing left over to live on.

    The obvious question is: why isn’t this being fixed?