Editorial

Do We Need to Ruin Local Economy to Support “Indigenous Renewal”?

We don’t need to ruin the area’s economy under the guise of a sanctimonious indigenous renewal, which will only result in providing the federal government greater powers in landlordship.

|


We don’t need to ruin the area’s local economy under the guise of a sanctimonious indigenous renewal, which will only result in providing the federal government greater powers in landlordship.

There is a better alternative than locking up land under greater federal control for improving the land’s viability both economically and environmentally. A major part of this idea would pay true homage to indigenous people by mimicking what indigenous people created in North America over hundreds of generations. The concept is called regenerative agriculture through large-herbivore intensive grazing.

There are 350 million acres of federal land in the west, currently, 250 million acres are administered for grazing by the BLM 100 million acres are controlled by the National Forest Service. 

Many of these acres were once lush grasslands, populated with thousands of beaver which made marshy small lakes and areas well-suited for waterfowl, migratory birds, and abundant game. In almost all of these marshes and wetlands, beavers were killed off and marshes were drained over a century ago to produce more optimal cattle grazing areas.

Most of our arid lands in the west today are nearly unsuitable for grazing. One cow for every forty acres is a common ratio on most BLM lands. Poor management of cattle on rangelands has converted thousands of acres of grasslands into sagebrush and scrub over the past century. Sagebrush range results in arroyos (or mini canyons) below ground level channeling water deeper underground, which retains far less moisture and carbon than does healthy grassland. 

This can be reversed through intensive cattle grazing operations. These operations are typically maintained by utilizing electric fences, whereby cattle are only allowed to feed on small areas (called paddocks) intensively for a few days before moving on to a new area, allowing the former area to rest and restore for up to sixty days before cattle are permitted to feed again.

This practice requires a great deal of effort by ranchers, moving fencing and cattle much more frequently, but it allows land to rest and regenerate after intensive cattle feeding periods. This process is far superior to the standard “free-ranging” which nearly always leads to overgrazing and the degradation of rangelands. 

The intensive grazing process is actually nothing new, it is the same process indigenous people promoted on the Great Plains, which supported millions of head of buffalo. The buffalo’s seasonal intensive migrations are what resulted in our Great Plains becoming one of the most fertile areas in the world and supporting more wildlife and taller grasslands than European settlers had ever witnessed.

Through intensive mowing by large herbivores along with defecation of manure, a natural regenerative soil-composting process occurs. This process happens on a microbial level and increases organic matter and biological activity resulting in topsoil improvement. Slow but steady soil fertility retention, improves the quality and water retention of grasslands. The improvement of biological activity and the retention of carbon in the soil can increase year after year resulting in a dramatic improvement of biodiversity and natural symbiotic ecological development.

The Indigenous people of America found methods of living in much greater harmony with the environment than we do today. We can borrow the best from their culture by honoring Mother Nature rather than harnessing and fighting her into submission. Petty arguments over power and authority ignore the albatross in the room: proper land management. All parties want the best for the environment. Nobody (except a very unfortunate few) wants to destroy the environment. The key is to maintain proper practices that support the improvement of natural symbiotic biological systems.

Below you can see a series of shots from a 15-year restoration project that has transformed an arid, eroded ranch into a habitat for wildlife, wild and native species, and amazing pastures by utilizing practices we mentioned in this article. 

MORE BY RICHARD MARKOSIAN

BACK TO OTHER STORIES

 

, ,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Left in a Box as a Baby: Trauma, Alcoholism, and Addiction

    A man abandoned as a baby builds a structured life in law enforcement, but unresolved trauma and alcoholism slowly begin to unravel it. His story raises a harder question about how change actually happens.


  • Cottonwood Heights Corruption Allegations: A Case That Never Reached a Courtroom

    A year ago, we here at Utah Stories recorded a podcast episode that we never published. We were revisiting corruption allegations from ten years ago. We decided not to publish the video, so it sat there on YouTube for nearly 12 months.

    Then somehow the video was published. How? We are not sure, but once it got out there, the comments came pouring in.

    Dozens of viewers, then hundreds, supported the video with their comments on our examination of allegations of police misconduct in Cottonwood Heights. The video recounts how the Police Department was reported by business owners as focusing enforcement on customers of the former Canyon Inn bar. These allegations did not result in a publicly documented, full investigation by Utah’s Justice Department nor the FBI (at least to our knowledge). So why rehash the past?

    We believe the story of The Canyon Inn (and other area business owners) vs. CHPD and Cottonwood Heights Mayor Kelvin Cullimore raises questions about what can happen when allegations surface and do not move forward through a formal legal process with state or federal oversight.

    In 2012, Cottonwood Heights business owners at the mouth of the canyons began publicly objecting to police activity whereby up to seven cruisers were pulling over 711 and Canyon Inn bar customers on their busiest evenings.

    According to those accounts, drivers leaving the bar were frequently pulled over by police and were given DUI tickets, sometimes even after passing a sobriety examination. The volume and concentration of those stops led residents and business owners to complain about the “heavy-handed treatment” of CHPD toward motorists, especially in and around the Canyon Inn and neighboring 711, and eventually the Porcupine Pub.

    Customers responded in predictable ways. Some chose not to return and avoid the area. Others went to different establishments. Over time, the owner of the Canyon Inn, Jim Stojack, stated that his revenue declined by 70% and that he believed police activity near his business was the main contributing factor.

    Utah Stories reported on these concerns by conducting interviews; gathering video documentation provided by those involved; and making public records requests. Through our GRAMA requests, we reviewed DUI citations issued by the Cottonwood Heights Police Department and examined how those cases were resolved in Holladay Justice Court. During that period, we observed a higher number based on our review of DUI cases dismissed in court due to lack of evidence compared to other jurisdictions. One DUI attorney, Tyler Ayers, went on record saying that CHPD was issuing a high volume of DUI citations that were later dismissed.

    That observation raised questions about how cases were being documented and prosecuted. It did not, on its own, establish intent or misconduct, but it became part of a broader set of concerns raised by multiple sources.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • The Perfect Girls’ Day in Park City: Brunch, Shopping, Spas & Nightlife

    After a week of work, grocery shopping, meal prep, driving the kids around, housework and last minute emergencies, a day of bonding and fun with our BFF’s is just what the doctor ordered. Fortunately, one of the best getaways is just a short drive away to Park City.


  • The Stratos Project Was Already Approved. So Why the Public Meeting?

    Thousands showed up to protest. The decision may have already been made.

    When thousands of Box Elder County residents packed the fairgrounds to protest the proposed 40,000-acre Stratos data center, they thought they were confronting the people in charge.

    They weren’t.

    The county commissioners stood at the front of the room, absorbing the anger, the frustration, the disbelief. They looked like decision-makers. But by their own account, they weren’t.

    Because the decision may have already been made—long before the public ever showed up.

    The Illusion of Authority

    What happened at that meeting wasn’t civic engagement. It was something closer to theater.

    No meaningful public comment. No real debate. No clear path for residents to influence the outcome. Just a room full of people reacting to a project that, structurally, may already be locked in.

    Why?

    Because the real authority doesn’t sit with Box Elder County.

    It sits with the Utah Military Installation Development Authority.

    Once MIDA designates a project area, the rules change. Local zoning can become irrelevant. Private land stays private. Water rights remain private. And the role of local government shifts from decision-maker to facilitator.

    In plain terms: the county doesn’t decide if the project happens. It helps manage how it happens.

    So when residents showed up demanding answers, they were asking the wrong people.

    A Process That Skips the Public

    That should concern anyone paying attention.

    Because it flips the normal order of things. Instead of:

    Proposal → Public input → Decision

    We get:

    Decision → Public meeting → Reaction

    And by the time the public enters the room, the real levers of power have already been pulled.

    So what exactly was that meeting?

    If commissioners don’t have authority to stop the project, then the meeting wasn’t about deciding anything. It was about absorbing pressure. Managing optics. Creating the appearance of a process that had already moved on.

    That’s not transparency. That’s choreography.

    Follow the Missing Pieces