Development Projects

Downtown SLC Building Boom: The New Face of Downtown Examined

Hundreds of transplants who earn lucrative salaries from companies such as Goldman Sachs, believe the rents in Salt Lake City are much more reasonable than those in places like New York and San Francisco, where the influx of high-rent properties underscores the shortage and failings of providing affordable and low-income housing to thousands.

|


On a typical week day, 23-year-old Mason Medart hops on the first Trax train to his investment research job at Goldman Sachs, puts in up to 16 hours, then works out at the rooftop gym at 4th West Apartments, and sometimes catches the sun setting over the mountains.

A transplant from St. Louis who went to college in Dallas, Medart is happy with his life since moving to Salt Lake City, although he acknowledges that his housing, at well over $1,000 a month, is pricey for a one-bedroom.

“I think it’s worth it though,” he said. “I like that I get to come home to a nice apartment with amenities like the gym. And I don’t have to get in my car and drive home from work.”

Nearby, on a chilly March Monday morning, people began lining up before 9 to get food from the Crossroads Urban Center, 347 S. 400 E., and help with bus fares and utilities. The stark contrast paints a picture of what is occurring downtown—the high-rent residential building boom is threatening to squeeze out not only the low-income and homeless, but the middle and working classes as well.

Hundreds of transplants who earn lucrative salaries from companies such as Goldman Sachs, believe the rents in Salt Lake City are much more reasonable than those in places like New York and San Francisco, where the influx of high-rent properties underscores the shortage and failings of providing affordable and low-income housing to thousands. Although some progress is slowly being made on that front, many people are being left behind because incomes for locals haven’t risen enough to match rocketing rents and home prices for the most desirable downtown locations.

The area stretching roughly from 200 North to 700 South, and 400 West to 700 East, is raging with a plethora of new properties for rent or sale, under construction, or in the planning stages. But if you’re looking for anything under the $1,000 range, east of the 300 West viaduct, even for a studio, good luck.

Couple that with the city’s continuing homeless problem, especially near the Rio Grande District, and you have a quandary: How can lower or no-income residents co-exist with the growing demand for posh upscale apartments?

Glenn Bailey, executive director of Crossroads Urban Center, is worried that gentrification is taking over downtown and can’t believe how many people are occupying expensive units for what he thinks are outlandish rents. Downtown really is becoming uptown, he believes, and the poorer residents will have to go where the wealthier ones don’t desire, often in neighborhoods with higher crime and substandard housing.

“I can’t understand how we can absorb that many [high-rent] units, but they are being leased,” Bailey said. “We actually feel like we’re losing more low-income housing than is being built.”

Take a stroll around the core of downtown and you’ll see what’s trending: luxury complexes with amenities like rooftop pools, gyms and WiFi lounges. The demand for more high-income dwellings is obviously there, spurred largely in part by employers, including Goldman Sachs and Fidelity Investments, expanding in Utah.

And more are on tap, including a $90 million, 24-story apartment building on State Street between 100 and 200 South announced last winter by real-estate developers Cowboy Properties and Boyer Company. Rents would range from about $1,000 to several thousands of dollars per month.

“We are in need of more housing in downtown—housing of all types: market-rate, affordable, condos, apartments, all of it,” said Nick Como, spokesman for the Downtown Alliance. “Housing for all has been a long-standing goal of our Downtown Rising initiative, and I know the city is actively looking for ways to inject affordability into our housing mix downtown.”

400 West under construction.

Similar in price to the Cowboy/Boyer development is 4th West (255 North 400 West, the 493-unit complex where Medart lives, which opened in November 2016. Boasting “The best views in Salt Lake City,” the property offers a 543-square-foot studio for $1,161, a $1,720 one bedroom, a $2,509 two bedroom and a $6,716, 1,625 square-foot penthouse with tiled showers, a separate laundry room, quartz countertops and upgraded appliances.

Then there’s the major attraction: a swanky rooftop replete with a pool, hot tub, yoga studio, basketball court, patio grill area, gym and clubhouse, where monthly events such as wine tastings and holiday fiestas are held.

While refusing to give the exact demographics of 4th West’s residents, leasing consultant Laura Enriquez did say most work for companies called preferred employers, who refer them. “They are predominantly from out of state,” she said. Those employers include Goldman Sachs, The University of Utah and Delta Airlines, as well as at least a couple of players on the Utah Jazz.

 

It’s safe to say, that in touring 4th West that the tenants are paying the high rents more for the amenities and the lifestyle the facilities offer than for peace and quiet. Down the street, closer to the heart of downtown at Liberty Crest Apartments, 150 South 200 East a leasing agent said the property attracts a more staid population who tend to come home and relax.

The apartments and townhomes cost between $1,175 for a one bedroom, to $3,700 for a three-bedroom penthouse. Liberty Crest is one of many of Cowboy’s projects, and some of their properties offer so-called affordable rents that are partially subsidized by government tax credits, but some of the waiting lists are more than a year long. To qualify, renters must make less than 60 percent of the area’s median income.

In the end, the question is whether the middle class, working poor and homeless, will be squeezed out of downtown and gentrification will rule in Salt Lake City’s downtown core.

It’s been a common story, but the positive side effect is that properties in formerly blighted and deteriorating areas are seeing signs of improvement.

Just five miles to the west of downtown Rose Park and Glendale are beginning to look like Sugar House did ten years ago. Millenials who want yards and gardens are still are still able to find deals in these areas. But apartments with upscale amenities and the advantage of “walkable” destinations are in short supply. Wayne Bailey, of Crossroads, said finding a one-bedroom apartment for $800 now, a “steal deal.”

“Our biggest concern is we need to have a city where everyone can afford to live together,” Bailey said. “Utah is still a fairly low-wage state. The low-income have a right to have stable housing options and not be concerned about being homeless.” The good news is that affordability can be found, just on the other side of the tracks.

 

Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • A Ski Village or a Tipping Point? Nordic Valley Expansion Divides Ogden Valley

    The project, known as Nordic Village, is expected to roll out over the next decade and represents one of the largest tourism developments in the valley’s history.


  • Ogden Utah: Boomtown, Bargain, or Utah’s Next Unaffordable City?

    With its reinvigorated downtown and close proximity to mountains and river pathways, this northern Utah city is enjoying a renaissance. Ogden’s stock of affordable housing — compared to other metros along the Wasatch Front — currently draws people in for a closer look. 


  • The End of an Era? FanX and the Salt Palace Closure

    For more than a decade, FanX has called the Salt Palace home. With the convention center set to close for a massive renovation, founder Dan Farr is preparing for a new chapter while planning one final celebration in its longtime venue.


  • The Stratos Project and Corporate Power: Who Controls Utah’s Future?

    If we were all just consumers, Governor Cox, Mike Lee, Speaker Schultz, and Kevin O’Leary would have it easy. If we were just more concerned about money, jobs, and tech, and less concerned about raising our kids in communities (not in front of screens), culture, the environment, and water, those smart dudes would get exactly what they want — Stratos: a city of the future, buzzing with processors and transistors, making all of our AI dreams come true! 

    The world we could live in would be a dazzling, Mr. Wonderful kind of place. We would beat those pesky Chinese in the AI war; our AI robots could do all of our farming and ostensibly harvest the water we need for the Great Salt Lake out of thin air. But apparently, we just don’t get it. We haven’t yet reached the point predicted by Aldous Huxley’s vision in Brave New World, where we are completely distracted, dopamine-driven consumers who only need sex, drugs, and stuff to remain happy.

    Maybe Stratos will be an amazing marvel, and somehow, as Governor Cox claims, “. . . add more water to the Great Salt Lake.” But we aren’t sold. While this Stratos project has received considerable attention, it’s worth taking a step back to attempt to understand how corporate power appears to have usurped civic power.

    Civics is the practice of shaping our society through our collective voices and community involvement. Ask the residents in Tremonton, Utah how well that is working out for them. Can we still shape our world through our elected leaders? Does it matter who we vote for at the ballot box if organizations like UDOT, UTA, and MIDA can supersede our local government authority and citizen backlash? 

    The corporatization of our communities and the interests that impact our political leaders’ decision making processes are seen as far more of a concern than the average Utah resident’s concerns. Special interests and corporate power are shaping Utah’s future more than ever. 

    It’s worth asking: ‘How can we regain control over shaping Utah’s future in light of the growing power and billions that the technocrats now wield in shaping our world today?’ Amazon’s market cap exceeds the GDP of Canada. The “Magnificent Seven” tech stocks now have a greater market cap than the entire GDP of Europe ($23.6 trillion. EU countries have $19.3 trillion GDP). Will tech companies become their own nation-states and dominate their own chunks of various states? Will we become their subjects?

    There are two sides to this coin: We love Utah not just because we have the most outdoor wilderness playgrounds, but also because of Utah’s prosperity and job market. This is because Utah has become a tech hub. Our tech leadership has minted several billionaires and billion-dollar businesses. Utah offers a market and an educated workforce that more businesses and giant corporations want to be a part of. This is a benefit for even non-tech Utahns.

    The problem with this success is that as we dole out more money to attract more tech businesses, data centers, fulfillment centers, and big corporate retailers, it becomes more difficult to carve out our “sense of community.” As corporate sovereignty replaces local business sovereignty, we see that our voices and our votes matter less.

    Ask who our politicians work for, and nearly every Utahn believes they work far more for their corporate donors than they work for the average Utah citizen. So how do we best regain control over our communities?

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).