Sundance Film Festival

A Different Man, Sundance 2024 Film Review

After some body horror, love lost and regained, and a new character introduced, A Different Man has a wild ride in store for audiences.

|


A Different Man follows Edward (Sebastian Stan), a man suffering from neurofibromatosis. This condition causes non-cancerous tumors to grow on a person’s body so badly that it can cause disfigurement. As a result, Edward has a meek personality and avoids social situations, fearing bullying and scrutiny.

Edward learns of an experimental procedure that can reverse his diagnosis. In the meantime, he meets his pretty neighbor, Ingrid (Renate Reinsve), a playwright who treats him with humanity, and Edward immediately gravitates to her. He gives her a typewriter, knowing it will be an apt gift for a writer. In a moment of confusion in Edward’s apartment, Edward grabs Ingrid’s hand, causing her to retract and leave the apartment.

After some body horror, love lost and regained, and a new character introduced, A Different Man has a wild ride in store for audiences.

Produced by studio A24, the film is weird, and campy, and couldn’t be more fitting for the distributor. A24 movies are known for their strange, groundbreaking, and original brands of storytelling. The crash zooms and intense musical score had me laughing, even with the intermittent on-screen horror I was witnessing.

Not everyone at the festival had a high opinion of A Different Man.

Darren Movie Reviews says on X, “A Different Man is a mixed bag. The musical score is outstanding and Adam Pearson is phenomenal! Sebastian Stan is good and the prosthetic work is truly transformative, but it’s too long. Felt like a short with not enough substance for two hours”

Brian Rowe opines on X as well, “Aaron Schimberg’s A Different Man is a cult movie in the making. Ambitious, beguiling, unusual, totally original. Excellent performances from Sebastian Stan, Renate Reinsve, and Adam Pearson. It didn’t all work for me on a narrative level, but there’s a lot to love.”

I found the film to be incisive about celebrity culture, egotism, and obsession. I also found it crucially smart not to paint the man with neurofibromatosis as the victim. The character introduced later in the film has many friends, is outgoing, funny, and the life of the party.

Following the film, writer/director Aaron Schimberg spoke in the Q&A about how he wanted to be sensitive to the disfigurement condition, but also didn’t want it to stop him from turning the character into a hero of sorts.

I wouldn’t recommend A Different Man to anyone who might be sensitive to disturbing imagery. I would recommend the film if you enjoy A24 films. It will find a limited audience, but those who find it appealing will truly embrace it. 

The film’s remaining screenings are sold out, but you can always join a waitlist. Luckily, if you miss it at the fest, the film will likely be released in 2024.

A quick note – Sundance is known for its big acquisitions. So far at the festival, there have been two big ones. A Real Pain, the Jesse Eisenberg-directed post-holocaust dramedy was acquired by Searchlight for $10 million, and Greg Jardin’s It’s What’s Inside horror flick was acquired by Netflix for $17 million. Even more impressive is that it’s Jardin’s directorial debut. 

,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Priced Out of Summer Fun? These Activities Cost Almost Nothing

    As summer approaches, many of us start looking for new ways to be active. Whether you’re emerging from a cozy winter of hibernation, or searching for a replacement for skiing and snowboarding, there are inexpensive and accessible ways to get outside, get active, and make the most of summer. 


  • Did Utah Leaders Already Sell Out Tremonton to Big Tech?

    When Kevin O’Leary appeared on Fox Business and casually announced that Utah would soon become home to what could be the largest AI data center project in the world, many Utahns had the same reaction:

    Wait… this was already approved?


  • The Armenian DNA Mystery No One Can Explain

    Joulhayan described ancient remains discovered near the Aras River, near Mount Ararat, where researchers reportedly compared ancient genetic samples with modern Armenians and found remarkable continuity stretching back thousands of years.
    “How could that be?” he asked. “Mongolians attacked. Turks. Persians. Romans. Greeks. Armenian DNA should have changed.”


  • Utah Wants Affordable Homes. So Why Did It Kill the Starter Home Bill?

    Utah leaders have spent years talking about affordable housing.

    Governor Spencer Cox has repeatedly emphasized the need for more attainable housing, with a goal of creating tens of thousands of starter homes priced below $300,000. Yet despite broad agreement that housing affordability remains one of the state’s biggest challenges, one proposal designed specifically to encourage the construction of smaller, more affordable single-family homes failed to advance during the most recent legislative session.

    The question raises an uncomfortable issue: if Utah agrees there is a shortage of starter homes, why are those homes still so difficult to build?

    According to attorney and real estate professional Asha Klarich, much of the debate comes down to how communities want to grow and who gets to make those decisions.

    House Bill 184, known as the Small Lots and Starter Homes Amendment, was intended to reduce regulatory barriers and allow smaller homes to be built on smaller lots. The proposal would have created a process for builders and homeowners to seek exceptions to local zoning requirements and construct homes on lots as small as roughly 5,400 square feet.

    The idea was straightforward. Smaller lots generally mean lower land costs. Lower land costs can translate into lower home prices.

    For many first-time buyers, that sounds far more appealing than another apartment building or densely packed townhome development.

    “I think most people would prefer a smaller home on a smaller lot than apartment-style living in a high-rise,” Klarich said during a recent discussion about housing legislation.

    The bill ultimately failed.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).