Editorial

Why Printing a Magazine in the Era of Social Media?

We were reminded why we print Utah Stories on paper. We were struck once again with a “community violation strike” for telling the truth.

|


Printing on paper kills trees; printing requires tons of energy; printing on paper requires ink that is not great for the environment. Printing is wasteful and expensive, it’s antiquated, it’s “legacy media”, it’s passe so why do it?

I was reminded last week why we print on paper. YouTube struck Utah Stories channel with a “community violation strike”. This violation wasn’t for any new content we had recently published, rather, it was for a podcast we produced nearly two years ago based on a KUTV news story about a Utah woman who had allegedly died from the Covid vaccine. We debunked the claim and stated the facts directly from the CDC’s website. Still, YouTube removed our content, and now they are threatening to remove our channel “if we violate their standards again.”

Why does this matter? YouTube, which is owned by Google, controls a huge chunk of all of the video that is streamed online. YouTube is incredible. I’m a huge fan of the platform, and we reach a much wider audience than we ever would without them. But now YouTube (Google), as well as Instagram (Facebook) and Twitter, are all getting marching orders from our deep-state authorities on what they must censor, and the FBI has been heavily involved in this censorship. 

Certainly the rise of newspapers created problems with misinformation and disinformation, but especially in the United States, the government never silenced newspapers or prevented the spread of information. Civil discourse and debate allowed citizens to arrive at their own conclusions and the best ideas rose to the top while the worst ideas were tossed into the trash-bin of history.

Now we are witnessing centralized powers telling us what we are allowed to talk about and what we cannot say. We must reject this trend, we must be able to report and talk about facts, but also examine various sides of issues which involve people’s opinions. The silencing of conscientious objectors to government policies violates our First Amendment. 

We print Utah Stories each month to keep our liberties and free speech alive and well in Utah. Perhaps you’ve noticed that we do not shy away from controversy and criticism of our government leaders no matter their political affiliation. We believe in debate, promoting critical thinking, and promoting democracy by sharing the truth.

 Please support the printing of this magazine that is not afraid to hold truth to power by subscribing. Big thanks to the hundreds who already have.

Subscribe to Utah Stories weekly newsletter and get our stories directly to your inbox

* indicates required





Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Utah Year in Review: Free Speech, Media, and the Fracturing of American Discourse

    Three months after a political killing in Utah stunned the nation, the shock has faded but the consequences have not. What followed was not collective reflection, but open celebration from ideological extremes — a moment that revealed how far American discourse has collapsed. Political violence was no longer universally condemned; it was filtered, justified, or dismissed depending on who held the microphone.

    Utah’s response exposed a deeper problem. Debate is no longer merely contentious — it is increasingly managed. Platforms that once claimed neutrality now decide which ideas are amplified, which are buried, and which voices quietly disappear. The result is a public square shaped less by truth than by permission.

    Over the past year, Utah has become an uncomfortable mirror for the nation. When institutions resist scrutiny, media abandons skepticism, and questioning power comes at a cost, democratic norms do not erode all at once — they fracture slowly, until silence feels safer than speech.

    To access this post, you must purchase Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Why We’re Less Healthy Than Our Parents and What Happened

    Something has gone wrong with our health. Each generation appears sicker than the one before, despite spending more on medicine than any society in history. At the same time, trust in once-authoritative sources of health guidance has eroded as pharmaceutical advertising increasingly blurs the line between reporting and recommendation. This piece examines how lifestyle, food, and institutional incentives reshaped our understanding of health—and why reclaiming it may require more courage than another prescription.

    To access this post, you must purchase Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).