Debate

More than Ever Utah Couples are Deciding to Not Have Children. We Ask, Why?

From 2010 to 2020, Utah’s birth rate declined by almost 22 percent, a trend mirrored across the US during a decade marked by economic struggle and the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.

|


Baby Boomers to Baby Busters — More Couples are Deciding to Not Have Children

From 2010 to 2020, Utah’s birth rate declined by almost 22 percent, a trend mirrored across the US during a decade marked by economic struggle and the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Research released in August 2022 by the University of Utah’s Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute illustrates this decrease. 

In 2010, Utah held the nation’s top slot with 2.45 births per woman. But by 2020, that number had dropped to 1.92, placing the beehive state fourth behind South Dakota, Nebraska and North Dakota.

The generation of baby boomers children born from 1946 to 1964 has now given way to “baby busters” as falling birth rates track with the economic instability of the times.

Some Utah couples had to move back in with parents because of skyrocketing mortgages and rents. But Utah State University’s Marriage Handbook cautions that this living arrangement “rarely works out well.”

Along with budget woes, other factors also play a role. And a surprising number of couples are simply deciding not to have children.

Dogs over kids. Illustration by Chris Bodily.
Dogs over kids. Illustration by Chris Bodily.

A PERSONAL CHOICE

West Bountiful residents Sheena McFarland and James Houchins met in their early 30s and married in mid-2017.

“When James and I first got together, we had thought kids would be in (our) path,” McFarland said. “Now we’re both 40. We knew the biological clock was ticking.”

After being diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis, McFarland also learned that her prescribed medication could damage a developing fetus. 

So she and Houchins explored adoption options and found that simply getting a child “through the door” could cost a daunting $50,000.

“How do we budget that?” said McFarland, who works in college-level marketing and communications.

She and Houchins both had adoptive parents and grew up as the oldest child in their respective families she of seven, he of three. So they’d already done their share of child-rearing.

“As we thought about both the financial and lifestyle sides of it, we made the decision that we love to travel so much that getting to explore the world was the option for us,” McFarland said.

For Salt Lake City resident Kim McDaniel, her decision not to have children came as a growing awareness that she could make that choice. As a teen, she discovered that one of her grandparents’ friends never had children. 

“I don’t know if that was a conscious decision or if they tried, but I had this sudden realization that I could legitimately NOT have them and that nobody could make me,” McDaniel said. “It was a huge relief!” 

McDaniel and her husband dated in high school during the late 1980’s and married in 1994. Now 51, she does marketing for the nonprofit Best Friends Animal Society and has no regrets about their decision.

”I appreciate the time and attention I can devote to my pets, my aging parents, my career, travel, hobbies, and my charitable interests,” McDaniel said.

Ogden residents Sarah Welliver met Ryan Duffy through Tinder in 2016. Now at 41 and 38 respectively, they proudly parent two lovable dogs. But children are decidedly not in their future. 

“We get to take our kids for walks and we don’t have to worry about college funds,” Welliver grinned.

Welliver and Duffy, both military veterans, lived in several states and countries before settling in Ogden. 

“It’s sort of what you see, like an expectation,” Welliver said of her high school mindset about having children some time in the future. “But as I got older, I knew that wasn’t what I wanted.”

Still, she grappled with the guilt of not giving her mom grandkids. 

“But we talked through that,” Welliver said, concluding that “letting your mom down isn’t a reason to have a kid.”

   Duffy is fully onboard with their child-free family.

“I think we all have a vision of what we want as an adult and mine was a wife and dogs,” Duffy said. But he considers it “selfish of others to say I have a social responsibility to have kids.”

PROS & CONS

Each of these couples had trouble identifying any downside to their decision.

“I have the freedom to do the hobbies I enjoy,” Duffy said. “I honestly have difficulty finding a con.”

Duffy, a firefighter at Dugway, enjoys woodworking in his spare time. Welliver worked as a photojournalist for several years and now serves as the public information officer for Utah’s Department of Health & Human Services.

“I felt I was trying to make the world better in small ways,” Welliver said of her demanding decade in journalism. “I still feel like I am. And that’s enough for me.”

Subscribe to Utah Stories weekly newsletter and get our stories directly to your inbox

* indicates required



,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Can Utahns Still Afford to Have Kids?

    When families cannot afford homes near their jobs, the daily math becomes brutal. Commutes stretch longer. Childcare costs pile up. Mortgages consume more of a household’s income. The result is what economists call “house-poor” families—people who technically own a home but have almost nothing left over to live on.

    The obvious question is: why isn’t this being fixed?


  • The Stratos Project Was Already Approved. So Why the Public Meeting?

    Thousands showed up to protest. The decision may have already been made.

    When thousands of Box Elder County residents packed the fairgrounds to protest the proposed 40,000-acre Stratos data center, they thought they were confronting the people in charge.

    They weren’t.

    The county commissioners stood at the front of the room, absorbing the anger, the frustration, the disbelief. They looked like decision-makers. But by their own account, they weren’t.

    Because the decision may have already been made—long before the public ever showed up.

    The Illusion of Authority

    What happened at that meeting wasn’t civic engagement. It was something closer to theater.

    No meaningful public comment. No real debate. No clear path for residents to influence the outcome. Just a room full of people reacting to a project that, structurally, may already be locked in.

    Why?

    Because the real authority doesn’t sit with Box Elder County.

    It sits with the Utah Military Installation Development Authority.

    Once MIDA designates a project area, the rules change. Local zoning can become irrelevant. Private land stays private. Water rights remain private. And the role of local government shifts from decision-maker to facilitator.

    In plain terms: the county doesn’t decide if the project happens. It helps manage how it happens.

    So when residents showed up demanding answers, they were asking the wrong people.

    A Process That Skips the Public

    That should concern anyone paying attention.

    Because it flips the normal order of things. Instead of:

    Proposal → Public input → Decision

    We get:

    Decision → Public meeting → Reaction

    And by the time the public enters the room, the real levers of power have already been pulled.

    So what exactly was that meeting?

    If commissioners don’t have authority to stop the project, then the meeting wasn’t about deciding anything. It was about absorbing pressure. Managing optics. Creating the appearance of a process that had already moved on.

    That’s not transparency. That’s choreography.

    Follow the Missing Pieces


  • Did Utah Leaders Already Sell Out Tremonton to Big Tech?

    When Kevin O’Leary appeared on Fox Business and casually announced that Utah would soon become home to what could be the largest AI data center project in the world, many Utahns had the same reaction:

    Wait… this was already approved?


  • The Stratos Project and Corporate Power: Who Controls Utah’s Future?

    If we were all just consumers, Governor Cox, Mike Lee, Speaker Schultz, and Kevin O’Leary would have it easy. If we were just more concerned about money, jobs, and tech, and less concerned about raising our kids in communities (not in front of screens), culture, the environment, and water, those smart dudes would get exactly what they want — Stratos: a city of the future, buzzing with processors and transistors, making all of our AI dreams come true! 

    The world we could live in would be a dazzling, Mr. Wonderful kind of place. We would beat those pesky Chinese in the AI war; our AI robots could do all of our farming and ostensibly harvest the water we need for the Great Salt Lake out of thin air. But apparently, we just don’t get it. We haven’t yet reached the point predicted by Aldous Huxley’s vision in Brave New World, where we are completely distracted, dopamine-driven consumers who only need sex, drugs, and stuff to remain happy.

    Maybe Stratos will be an amazing marvel, and somehow, as Governor Cox claims, “. . . add more water to the Great Salt Lake.” But we aren’t sold. While this Stratos project has received considerable attention, it’s worth taking a step back to attempt to understand how corporate power appears to have usurped civic power.

    Civics is the practice of shaping our society through our collective voices and community involvement. Ask the residents in Tremonton, Utah how well that is working out for them. Can we still shape our world through our elected leaders? Does it matter who we vote for at the ballot box if organizations like UDOT, UTA, and MIDA can supersede our local government authority and citizen backlash? 

    The corporatization of our communities and the interests that impact our political leaders’ decision making processes are seen as far more of a concern than the average Utah resident’s concerns. Special interests and corporate power are shaping Utah’s future more than ever. 

    It’s worth asking: ‘How can we regain control over shaping Utah’s future in light of the growing power and billions that the technocrats now wield in shaping our world today?’ Amazon’s market cap exceeds the GDP of Canada. The “Magnificent Seven” tech stocks now have a greater market cap than the entire GDP of Europe ($23.6 trillion. EU countries have $19.3 trillion GDP). Will tech companies become their own nation-states and dominate their own chunks of various states? Will we become their subjects?

    There are two sides to this coin: We love Utah not just because we have the most outdoor wilderness playgrounds, but also because of Utah’s prosperity and job market. This is because Utah has become a tech hub. Our tech leadership has minted several billionaires and billion-dollar businesses. Utah offers a market and an educated workforce that more businesses and giant corporations want to be a part of. This is a benefit for even non-tech Utahns.

    The problem with this success is that as we dole out more money to attract more tech businesses, data centers, fulfillment centers, and big corporate retailers, it becomes more difficult to carve out our “sense of community.” As corporate sovereignty replaces local business sovereignty, we see that our voices and our votes matter less.

    Ask who our politicians work for, and nearly every Utahn believes they work far more for their corporate donors than they work for the average Utah citizen. So how do we best regain control over our communities?

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).