Community Relations

Centerville Mobile Estates Residents Forced to Leave Their Homes

Last March, the 45 households received letters from Centerville Mobile Estates saying the land had been sold and they had nine months to vacate. The buyer, CW Land Co., a Centerville-based company, had contracted to buy the 6.6-acre site and plans to build a development that includes duplexes, townhomes, racquetball and tennis courts and green…

|


Brad Bangerter is one of several residents who faced eviction from Centerville Mobile Estates. Photos by Dung Hoang

Centerville Mobile Estates has been home for Dennis Tireman, an army veteran, for nearly half a century. His home was paid for and life was good in the Davis County community at 555 N 400 W, near Interstate 15.

Casey Nielsen, who has lived at the trailer park for six years, also owns his home free and clear, and put $10,000 into fixing it up. “It’s a nice little home for me,” he said. “This has been my haven.”

A newer resident, Jennifer Pace, a single mother of two, spent two months and more than $15,000 renovating a double-wide she bought in April 2019. She felt good about the location (her parents live a block away and her grandparents also live in Centerville) and the $250 monthly rent for her space at the park.

Even when she and the other residents received a written notice on their doors that rent was going up, Pace was still happy she had moved to the park because of a sentence at the bottom of the paper saying, “we look forward to having you here for many more years.”

“We felt good about our choice then,” Pace said.

Deborah Cabezas at Centerville Mobile Estates.

But last March, the 45 households received letters from Centerville Mobile Estates saying the land had been sold and they had nine months to vacate. The buyer, CW Land Co., a Centerville-based company, had contracted to buy the 6.6-acre site and plans to build a development that includes duplexes, townhomes, racquetball and tennis courts and green space.

The residents have until Jan. 4, 2021, to leave. CW Land offered $2,000 to those who vacated the property by October 15. 

Many residents say a few thousand dollars is not nearly enough to cover relocation costs. Trailers can be expensive to relocate and many residents say a few thousand dollars is not nearly enough to cover relocation costs. In addition, mobile homes manufactured before June 15, 1976, do not meet federal Housing and Urban Development Department standards so other trailer parks will not accept them.

Adding to the residents’ stress are the COVID-19 pandemic and the economic downturn, which caused some to lose their jobs. 

 Some residents hoped Centerville would intervene, but the city doesn’t have any jurisdiction over a private sale or development plans as long as the owners comply with zoning and building regulations, according to Cory Snyder, community development director. In July, residents protested outside CW offices, demanding that the sale be called off.

“All of these trailers are too old to be moved, so pretty much they are taking our homes from us and giving us $2,000,” Pace said.

Brandi Dudley.

She added that there are veterans, elderly people and single mothers “who can’t afford to live in Centerville, let alone anywhere, on their incomes right now. Some have already moved out and some are still wondering what to do. We don’t believe that CW is going to compensate us for what our trailers are appraised for.”

For a short time, it looked like the residents might get a reprieve. Rulon Harrison, one of the siblings who owned the park, said he had not given permission for the sale and was concerned about what would happen to the residents. The Centerville Mobile Estates LLC owners, and CW Land representatives, held a mediation a few days after the protest to resolve the dispute.

The parties reached an agreement that the sale would go through on October 13 as scheduled, and CW Land would set up a fund to help out the residents. A third-party will decide, based on the residents’ individual circumstances, how much assistance each will receive. Every household is guaranteed the $2,000, regardless of whether the trailer is moved or left on the property. The two sides are not saying how much money will be distributed.

S:C mayor office

 During this process, the primary concern of Centerville Mobile Estates (CME) has been the well-being of the park residents, attorney Jordan Bledsoe, who represents Rulon Harrison, said. 

“CME appreciates CW Development Group’s willingness to participate in this process in good faith and to go above and beyond what is legally required to assist the residents,” Bledsoe said in an email. 

In a written statement, Darlene Carter, president of CW Urban, a subsidiary of the CW Group, said, “we are sensitive to the plight of the residents who will need to relocate.” 

The statement continues, “We realize the seriousness of the situation and, following our purchase of the real property, we will be fully committed to assisting the residents, logistically and financially, to find new housing arrangements.”

Still, it will be hard for many to find housing they can afford in Davis County. 

Nielsen was putting belongings in storage in the summer while he tried to figure out what to do. He will have to leave his trailer behind because it’s too old to move. “Rent is expensive,”  he said. “Houses are ridiculously expensive. I’m not really sure what to do.”

Many others are in the same bind. Inge Richins said rent for a two-bedroom apartment can be $1,300 a month a big jump from the $450 a month she and her husband paid for their spot at the park, where they’ve lived for 20 years.

However, she said, “We’re better off than a lot of us here, but it’s going to be a struggle. There are some who will end up on the street.”

Tireman and his wife have moved to an apartment in Bountiful, leaving behind their trailer, which they purchased for $6,000, when they moved to the park in 1973. 

Pace said some people sold their trailers but “nobody will get close to market value.” She bought a trailer in another park and is sad that she and her kids will no longer live in the home she spent so much time fixing up.

“I am not expecting anything from CW,” Pace said in an email. “If we get anything, I feel it will be laughable.”

Caroline Echols, 88, who lives in a recently updated trailer that can’t be moved, said the sellers will make a lot of money on the park sale, but she and her neighbors don’t have the funds to easily relocate. Plus, she’ll miss living at Centerville Mobile Estates which she has called home for the past 25 years.

“We’re just in a big mess,” she said. “It’s been a battle since March. I didn’t think I’d leave here until I was in a pine box.”

 

MORE BY PAMELA MANSON

BACK TO OTHER STORIES

, ,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • A Ski Village or a Tipping Point? Nordic Valley Expansion Divides Ogden Valley

    The project, known as Nordic Village, is expected to roll out over the next decade and represents one of the largest tourism developments in the valley’s history.


  • Utah Official’s $36K Travel Reimbursements Raise Questions About Use of Taxpayer Funds

    The trek into the office is a necessary evil for many employees; unpaid time that could be spent elsewhere. But some state employees are able to cash in on their commutes.

    That includes one member of Gov. Spencer Cox’s cabinet who heads the Utah Department of Cultural & Community Engagement. The department oversees a number of civic and social programs ranging from museums, libraries and the state historical society, to volunteerism efforts and multicultural affairs. 

    The employee’s in-state travel expenses made up a large chunk of the department’s employee reimbursements in recent years, according to documents obtained by The Utah Investigative Journalism Project obtained through a public records request. 

    The UIJP reviewed spreadsheets detailing the reimbursed expenses of the department’s 17-person leadership team over the 2024 and 2025 fiscal years. 

    The analysis showed one employee, Executive Director Donna Law, accounted for nearly a third of the team’s reimbursements in 2024 and 43% in 2025. Law, who lives in Cedar City, spent more than 11 times the average amount spent by all other employees included in the analysis. 

    The majority of Law’s expenses were categorized as in-state travel, which includes mileage and lodging. Between the two years, she spent $21,607.94 on lodging, $10,135.42  on auto mileage, and $1,455.00 in miscellaneous travel expenses and meals for a total of over $33,000. 

    The next highest amount spent on in-state travel was $3,385. Law’s overall spending far exceeded any other employee.

    The nearly $36,000 Law spent on travel and other items wasnearly three times that spent by the employee with the second highest amount in reimbursements. His expenses, in contrast, were largely out-of-state travel.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • The $7 Million Recruit: How NIL Changed College Athletics Forever

    In 2012, Jabari Parker, a top high school prospect and member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was facing his biggest decision to that point in his life: where to play college basketball. 

    Fans of BYU athletics hoped and perhaps prayed that Parker would pick the school owned by the church he was raised in. BYU was listed as one of his final choices. But he ultimately chose to spend his college years at Duke before attempting a career in the NBA. BYU fans were disappointed, but no one was truly surprised. Duke over BYU was the best choice for a young prospect in 2012. 

    A.J. Dybantsa.

    What changed between 2012 and 2024 when A.J. Dybantsa, the number one high school prospect, chose BYU over every other school? The answer is roughly $7 million dollars. That is what Dybantsa is reportedly making to play basketball at BYU. 

    The deal was supported by Utah Jazz owner Ryan Smith, who met multiple times with the Dybantsa family in multiple attempts to bring the young player to Provo. 

    According to Smith, he had no financial role in bringing Dybantsa to BYU, but the influence of Utah’s most famous billionaire acting as a “booster” or unofficial recruiter certainly swayed the decision.

    Prior to 2021, boosters acting as recruiters was taboo to the NCAA governing body. It was called improper recruiting. But in 2021, California began the modern era of NIL, or the ability of a college athlete to benefit from their name, image, or likeness, when they passed the “Fair Pay to Play Act.” 

    This new law gave college athletes in California the ability to benefit from their NIL, something that was banned in the rest of the country to that point. The NCAA saw that this law would create an unfair advantage for California schools that could now give young athletes the chance to make money off their talent and image while still in college. 

    The NCAA knew they needed to do something quickly, so they rushed through a policy that opened up NIL to all college athletes in the country, and it has been expanding and evolving over the last four years. 

    Grant Duff, who has coached at the University of Utah, Weber State University, and is now the defensive coordinator for Idaho State University, says, “The best part of NIL is that athletes have an opportunity to make good money. The downside comes with the free-for-all that money causes.”

    Dybantsa confers with BYU Head coach, Kevin Young.

    One of the biggest current examples of what a school can do when the boosters are willing to pay for success is Texas Tech University. From 2020-2024, Texas Tech had 34 wins, which works out to 6.8 wins per year with a low of 4 wins and high of 8. Then Texas Tech’s boosters got involved, led by Cody Campbell, an oil industry businessman and Chairman of the Texas Tech board. The football program was given 28 million dollars for NIL with a simple message attached to the large pile of money: Win. And win now. And win they did. 

    By signing NIL deals with athletes in the transfer portal, Texas Tech went from a middle-of-the-pack school in their conference to one of the top 12 teams in the country. They didn’t just win games in 2025, they made many of their opponents look like they didn’t belong on the same field, including the University of Utah and BYU twice. That is what money can buy.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Cottonwood Heights Corruption Allegations: A Case That Never Reached a Courtroom

    A year ago, we here at Utah Stories recorded a podcast episode that we never published. We were revisiting corruption allegations from ten years ago. We decided not to publish the video, so it sat there on YouTube for nearly 12 months.

    Then somehow the video was published. How? We are not sure, but once it got out there, the comments came pouring in.

    Dozens of viewers, then hundreds, supported the video with their comments on our examination of allegations of police misconduct in Cottonwood Heights. The video recounts how the Police Department was reported by business owners as focusing enforcement on customers of the former Canyon Inn bar. These allegations did not result in a publicly documented, full investigation by Utah’s Justice Department nor the FBI (at least to our knowledge). So why rehash the past?

    We believe the story of The Canyon Inn (and other area business owners) vs. CHPD and Cottonwood Heights Mayor Kelvin Cullimore raises questions about what can happen when allegations surface and do not move forward through a formal legal process with state or federal oversight.

    In 2012, Cottonwood Heights business owners at the mouth of the canyons began publicly objecting to police activity whereby up to seven cruisers were pulling over 711 and Canyon Inn bar customers on their busiest evenings.

    According to those accounts, drivers leaving the bar were frequently pulled over by police and were given DUI tickets, sometimes even after passing a sobriety examination. The volume and concentration of those stops led residents and business owners to complain about the “heavy-handed treatment” of CHPD toward motorists, especially in and around the Canyon Inn and neighboring 711, and eventually the Porcupine Pub.

    Customers responded in predictable ways. Some chose not to return and avoid the area. Others went to different establishments. Over time, the owner of the Canyon Inn, Jim Stojack, stated that his revenue declined by 70% and that he believed police activity near his business was the main contributing factor.

    Utah Stories reported on these concerns by conducting interviews; gathering video documentation provided by those involved; and making public records requests. Through our GRAMA requests, we reviewed DUI citations issued by the Cottonwood Heights Police Department and examined how those cases were resolved in Holladay Justice Court. During that period, we observed a higher number based on our review of DUI cases dismissed in court due to lack of evidence compared to other jurisdictions. One DUI attorney, Tyler Ayers, went on record saying that CHPD was issuing a high volume of DUI citations that were later dismissed.

    That observation raised questions about how cases were being documented and prosecuted. It did not, on its own, establish intent or misconduct, but it became part of a broader set of concerns raised by multiple sources.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).