Utah Stories

Sugar House Residents and Council Members on The Proposed Homeless Shelter

Salt Lake City mayor Jackie Biskupski announced in December that a 150-bed homeless shelter will be built near Sugar House’s Fairmont Park. Biskupski and Salt Lake City Council made the decision without public involvement. Biskupski says it’s “Not up for debate. The decision of the location is final”. Three other shelters were announced—also to be…

|


Salt Lake City mayor Jackie Biskupski announced in December that a 150-bed homeless shelter will be built near Sugar House’s Fairmont Park. Biskupski and Salt Lake City Council made the decision without public involvement. Biskupski says it’s “Not up for debate. The decision of the location is final”. Three other shelters were announced—also to be built in suburban areas. Salt Lake Valley residents, needless to say, flooded the Mayor’s office with emails and letters. They voiced their concern and, in some cases, outrage.

As a Sugar House resident, I share the concern of my fellow citizens. My home has been burglarized four times in recent years. My neighbors have been the victims of similar crimes. Sugar House Police say they have more case files than they can get to, and now a new homeless shelter is to be built? How will this affect crime in the area? Fairmont Park already has issues with drug trafficking and homeless loitering.

We asked Sugar House Community Council members what they think of Biskupski and the City Council’s decision. Here is what they said.

Judi Short: “We can work to try to make sure that we get a population of women or families with children, instead of the general (homeless) population. And we can work to make sure that certain conditions are in place. Not knowing much about the “model” that will be used, we can only speculate, but would like to have security, no people loitering, perhaps a locked facility, etc. We don’t want this to increase the homeless population we already have in Fairmont Park. We will work with the city to ensure that this facility provides a low impact to the neighborhood surrounding it, as well as the greater Sugar House area.”

Topher Horman: “I can hardly imagine the painful choices made in overhauling the strategy for combating homelessness in 21st Century Salt Lake City. We’ve completely outgrown our 1970’s model, and we truly have a tent city crisis downtown that brought massive problems that I honestly do not believe will fully translate over to the new shelters.

“I am encouraged that the community panel has worked with the Council, City Mayor, County Mayor, and others. This is a necessary, bold, frightening move for Salt Lake, and I do feel that many key perspectives have been included in these difficult decisions.

“As much as I hate the lack of full transparency in the finality of the selection process, I can also see, and begrudgingly accept, their desire to place the full burden on themselves as elected officials to prevent the nasty rancor that would have come from a public whittling of 11 sites down to 4.

“I have also seen many smaller homeless facilities around the country that are simply not invasive to their surroundings. The YWCA on 300 S is an excellent example of what might end up on Simpson.

“If Simpson truly becomes the women and children’s center, I have huge concerns what this does to our children’s school, Nibley Park K-8. Nibley is award-winning and brimming with diversity, and could easily tip to being a Title 1 school. The kids at our school would be welcome at the already diverse Nibley, but there should be City help and recourse to prevent any change in school classification from this decision.

“I have had friends go homeless over the years and transition successfully back with a hand up, not a hand out. I strongly believe that if we offer distinct treatment plans for the temporarily homeless, the chronically homeless, the mentally ill, the addicted, and send the dealers to jail that are preying on the above, these smaller shelters are the right way to go.

“The responsibility now fully rests on the Council and Mayor to successfully support, fund, and protect the neighborhoods around these sites. I was happy to see Lisa Adams going door to door immediately following this announcement. That responsiveness to her constituents meant a lot to me.

“Simply put, Salt Lake can’t screw this up, and needs to step up in a huge way to make this model successful. Let’s start with the ridiculous 40 minute SLCPD response times and rampant crime we have in the Sugar Hood. Solve that NOW, and I am hopeful this shelter will be able to fit in with, and not harm, the surrounding neighborhoods.”

Amy Barry: “The city needs to build trust with the residents who feel blindsided, as they have such a vested interest in their community.”

 

Sugar House residents Erin and Matt with dog, Dobby, just a half block from the proposed homeless shelter. Erin works with the homeless downtown. She says, “We support the move. They are taking homeless out of a very high-risk area and moving (the women and children) to a low-risk area. The current shelter attempts to serve far too many homeless needs in one place. This will decentralize the population and make it safer for the homeless and residents.”

 

 

, , ,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Artist Kate Kilpatrick Brings Utah’s History to Life Through Murals

    “I think we’re all interconnected; as individuals as well as societies,” Kilpatrick notes. Her work showcases those connections exuberantly, and whatever scale she’s working on, you can bet that in terms of energy and spirit, she’s painting large.


  • Dyslexia and ADHD in Kids: Why Some Students Struggle to Read in School

    That’s what led to my conversation with Donell Pons, a Utah-based dyslexia expert who has spent more than two decades working with students who struggle to read. What struck me right away is how often we get the problem wrong from the start.


  • Why Most People Stay Stuck in Business and What It Takes to Move Forward

    Every so often, you meet an immigrant who came here with almost nothing and managed to build something exceptional.

    Prakash Shah is the kind of man who has spent enough time around risk that he no longer treats it like an interruption.

    Today, he works in business brokerage and advisory, helping owners sell companies, helping buyers decide whether they should step in, and, when the fit is right, helping connect those buyers with private equity. He works in a world of valuations, leverage, due diligence, and hard questions that most people would rather postpone. He also operates in Utah real estate and has built a career around seeing value before it is obvious to everyone else. That is who he is now. What makes him interesting is how early that instinct started to form, and how little his life resembles the way most Americans are raised to think about comfort, career, and security.

    He grew up in Nepal in a boarding school system that would feel severe to many Americans. He was an only child, yet he saw his parents only twice a year for twelve straight years, until high school graduation. He lived inside routine. He shared space with boys from different social classes and different family circumstances. The school was structured enough that money did not buy you any special standing once you were inside. Everyone followed the same rules. Everyone was subject to the same discipline. In his case, it was an army school. Everything was measured. Everything was scheduled. In that kind of environment, you do not build your life around preference. You build it around adaptation.

    That contrast matters.

    A lot of American children are raised to search for what fits them. What are you passionate about? What do you enjoy? What feels right? Those are not bad questions, but they can create a habit of waiting for life to align itself before action begins. Prakash learned something else much earlier. He learned that life often does not align itself first. You enter the room as it is, you deal with the people in it, and you figure out how to function without making your comfort the center of every decision. He said that one of the biggest lessons from those years was tolerance, the ability to live with people from all walks of life and genuinely learn to get along with them. That is not a soft value. In business, it turns into resilience. In negotiation, it turns into patience. In career terms, it turns into range.

    When he came to the United States over 25 years ago, he did not arrive with the kind of runway that allows for a prolonged identity search. He came with two suitcases and enough money for one semester. He went to Hunter College in New York City, then to NYIT near Central Park, studying media and then media and technology management. He also studied psychology. Those details matter because they show something about his mind. He was interested in people before he built a career around deals. Even then, what attracted him was not technical prestige. It was understanding motives, behavior, and how people reveal themselves.

    But New York is merciless toward vague ambition. It demands payment in rent, transit, food, and time.

    Prakash worked constantly. He took multiple jobs. He paid tuition, paid rent, and skipped most of what Americans imagine as college life. There were no romantic years of drifting from café to concert to self-discovery. He talked about not having the luxury of dates, travel, or finding himself. He was working. Even laundry was not a small detail. In New York, he pointed out, you do not just throw clothes in a machine at home. You haul them to the laundromat, count quarters, and measure what is necessary. He also described distraction in a way that most native-born Americans probably do not think about. For immigrants, distraction is not always pleasure. Sometimes distraction is the constant pressure of competing needs. Tuition or rent. Food or savings. A better coat or another month of making do. He was not romanticizing the struggle. He was describing the arithmetic of it.

    That arithmetic did not make him cautious. If anything, it did the opposite.

    While in college, he had the option of safer analytical work. Instead, he took a sales job with Time Warner Cable that sent him into the South Bronx from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. to knock on doors. He is not a physically imposing man. He knew exactly what kind of neighborhoods he was walking into. He described apartment buildings where people kept pit bulls, where tension was normal, where one mistake in tone or timing could end a conversation immediately. For most people, that kind of job would have been something to survive and forget. For him, it became a school in human behavior. “It’s not about talking… it’s about listening,” he said.

    One story from that period says almost everything about how he operates. He knocked on a door one night around 8:45 and found himself facing a huge man with a gun on the table, pit bulls nearby, and a half-eaten pizza in front of him. It had all the ingredients of a very bad scene.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Ancient Pyramid Discovered in Sugar House Park, Salt Lake City

    A Salt Lake City resident says he may have uncovered what he believes to be a buried structure beneath a well-known hill in Sugar House Park, raising questions that have drawn both curiosity and skepticism.