Utah Stories

Pet Friendly Sugar House

Sugar House invites pet lovers with many pet-friendly residential developments.

|


Judi Wade Rosie 2014 July 4
Rosie with Wade Jones and Judi Short

Not every neighborhood has a first lady, but Sugar House does. Miss Rosie Short is familiar to everyone who lives and works around the town center. Touring her domain each day, Rosie, a tri-color Beagle, visits Liberty Park, Gilgal Gardens, Westminster and Hidden Hollow Nature Preserve. She often appears at festivals, farmers markets, grand openings, and on the 4th of July, in the annual Pet Parade.

Next year, there may be many more dogs strutting around the business district. Of the nine existing and new residential developments in the town center, seven are pet-friendly. The oldest is Lincoln Towers, and the largest is Irving Schoolhouse Apartments, which allows cats and dogs in all of its 232 units.

When it opens this fall, the new mixed-use Vue at Sugar House Crossing will have 211 apartments and perhaps as many pets as people in each of them. A recent City ordinance removed the limit on the numbers of dogs and cats that can be owned by a resident, provided that all dogs and cats are properly licensed and cared for. But property owners can impose their own limits. The Wilmington Gardens project, which will open later this year, allows one pet per resident and limits the size of dogs to 25 lbs.

Pam Bergeron at Sugar House Veterinary Clinic said she expects a noticeable increase in their clientele once the new apartment and condos are occupied. She said the greatest challenge for apartment dwellers is providing their pets with enough exercise to keep them healthy and calm.

Judi Wade Rosie at the Draw
Judi Wade Rosie at the Draw

For cats and small dogs, a few laps around the house may be enough to keep them fit. But Selma Saran, property manager at 21st and View said that her canine tenants seem to enjoy walks in Sugar House Park and around the block. The management even provides waste pickup bags at stations around the apartment complex.

Best Friends Adoption Center on 11th East specializes in finding the right owners and environment for the animals in their care. Marketing specialist Jaimi Haig recommends mixed-terrier, -poodle and -Pug breeds for apartment-dwellers, or medium-sized Beagles like Rosie. Larger dogs benefit from crate-training to make them feel safe when left alone for long periods. And daily walks are essential. Haig said that Sugar House is a great place for walking, where new residents can get to know the neighborhood while exercising their pets.

A stately walk may suit many dogs, but some people and their pets need other options for recreation and exercise. Running on a trail satisfies both species, so Salt Lake City is considering new policies for off-leash areas at parks and trails such as the Bonneville Shoreline Trail.

An Off-Leash Working Group convened by the City Council recommended that Salt Lake explore options for new dog parks and part-time off-leash areas in existing parks and open spaces. Fairmont Park and Wasatch Hollow are under consideration as pilot projects. Both are attractive since they offer access to natural water features.

In addition, the working group suggested that the City could allow some golf courses, including Forestdale in Sugar House, to be used for off-leash dogs during the off-season or at certain hours of the day. The City Council is considering other policy changes for City golf courses, so that discussion will take place at some future date.

One way or another, Rosie will have lots of company soon on the streets of Sugar House.

Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • The $7 Million Recruit: How NIL Changed College Athletics Forever

    In 2012, Jabari Parker, a top high school prospect and member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was facing his biggest decision to that point in his life: where to play college basketball. 

    Fans of BYU athletics hoped and perhaps prayed that Parker would pick the school owned by the church he was raised in. BYU was listed as one of his final choices. But he ultimately chose to spend his college years at Duke before attempting a career in the NBA. BYU fans were disappointed, but no one was truly surprised. Duke over BYU was the best choice for a young prospect in 2012. 

    A.J. Dybantsa.

    What changed between 2012 and 2024 when A.J. Dybantsa, the number one high school prospect, chose BYU over every other school? The answer is roughly $7 million dollars. That is what Dybantsa is reportedly making to play basketball at BYU. 

    The deal was supported by Utah Jazz owner Ryan Smith, who met multiple times with the Dybantsa family in multiple attempts to bring the young player to Provo. 

    According to Smith, he had no financial role in bringing Dybantsa to BYU, but the influence of Utah’s most famous billionaire acting as a “booster” or unofficial recruiter certainly swayed the decision.

    Prior to 2021, boosters acting as recruiters was taboo to the NCAA governing body. It was called improper recruiting. But in 2021, California began the modern era of NIL, or the ability of a college athlete to benefit from their name, image, or likeness, when they passed the “Fair Pay to Play Act.” 

    This new law gave college athletes in California the ability to benefit from their NIL, something that was banned in the rest of the country to that point. The NCAA saw that this law would create an unfair advantage for California schools that could now give young athletes the chance to make money off their talent and image while still in college. 

    The NCAA knew they needed to do something quickly, so they rushed through a policy that opened up NIL to all college athletes in the country, and it has been expanding and evolving over the last four years. 

    Grant Duff, who has coached at the University of Utah, Weber State University, and is now the defensive coordinator for Idaho State University, says, “The best part of NIL is that athletes have an opportunity to make good money. The downside comes with the free-for-all that money causes.”

    Dybantsa confers with BYU Head coach, Kevin Young.

    One of the biggest current examples of what a school can do when the boosters are willing to pay for success is Texas Tech University. From 2020-2024, Texas Tech had 34 wins, which works out to 6.8 wins per year with a low of 4 wins and high of 8. Then Texas Tech’s boosters got involved, led by Cody Campbell, an oil industry businessman and Chairman of the Texas Tech board. The football program was given 28 million dollars for NIL with a simple message attached to the large pile of money: Win. And win now. And win they did. 

    By signing NIL deals with athletes in the transfer portal, Texas Tech went from a middle-of-the-pack school in their conference to one of the top 12 teams in the country. They didn’t just win games in 2025, they made many of their opponents look like they didn’t belong on the same field, including the University of Utah and BYU twice. That is what money can buy.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Why Did Salt Lake City Tear Down Its Most Beautiful Buildings?

    If you go into the Utah State Archives and spend time with photographs from the late 1800s and early 1900s, you start to notice something that doesn’t line up with what exists today.

    Main Street looks cohesive. Not in a uniform way, but in a way that suggests the people building it shared an understanding of proportion, material, and permanence. Four-story buildings line the street—stone, brick, cast iron—each one detailed in ways that don’t feel incidental. Arched windows, carved stone, brickwork that changes pattern as it rises. Even the cast iron facades were designed to replicate masonry, not hide behind it.

    Then you go downtown and try to find those same buildings.

    Most of them are gone.

    Out of more than 400 buildings designed by Richard Kletting, over 300 have been torn down. That number alone reframes the conversation. Kletting designed the Utah State Capitol, the Saltair resort, commercial buildings, schools, churches, mansions—virtually every type of structure…

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Momomaru Sushi Review: Salt Lake City’s New Destination for Japanese Hand Rolls

    A new Salt Lake City sushi spot is drawing crowds with Japanese-style hand rolls served fresh, fast, and warm, offering a more intimate and interactive take on traditional sushi.


  • The Stratos Project Was Already Approved. So Why the Public Meeting?

    Thousands showed up to protest. The decision may have already been made.

    When thousands of Box Elder County residents packed the fairgrounds to protest the proposed 40,000-acre Stratos data center, they thought they were confronting the people in charge.

    They weren’t.

    The county commissioners stood at the front of the room, absorbing the anger, the frustration, the disbelief. They looked like decision-makers. But by their own account, they weren’t.

    Because the decision may have already been made—long before the public ever showed up.

    The Illusion of Authority

    What happened at that meeting wasn’t civic engagement. It was something closer to theater.

    No meaningful public comment. No real debate. No clear path for residents to influence the outcome. Just a room full of people reacting to a project that, structurally, may already be locked in.

    Why?

    Because the real authority doesn’t sit with Box Elder County.

    It sits with the Utah Military Installation Development Authority.

    Once MIDA designates a project area, the rules change. Local zoning can become irrelevant. Private land stays private. Water rights remain private. And the role of local government shifts from decision-maker to facilitator.

    In plain terms: the county doesn’t decide if the project happens. It helps manage how it happens.

    So when residents showed up demanding answers, they were asking the wrong people.

    A Process That Skips the Public

    That should concern anyone paying attention.

    Because it flips the normal order of things. Instead of:

    Proposal → Public input → Decision

    We get:

    Decision → Public meeting → Reaction

    And by the time the public enters the room, the real levers of power have already been pulled.

    So what exactly was that meeting?

    If commissioners don’t have authority to stop the project, then the meeting wasn’t about deciding anything. It was about absorbing pressure. Managing optics. Creating the appearance of a process that had already moved on.

    That’s not transparency. That’s choreography.

    Follow the Missing Pieces