Investigation

Utah’s Economy: Growing Utah’s Cities and Communities to have A Strong Local Economic Tax Base

The skyline of the Wasatch Front shows growth and development everywhere. But much of the growth is among homogenous corporate retail chains, restaurants, and big-box stores. According to Val Hale, who is the President of  Utah’s Office of Economic Development, AKA GoEd – the Governor’s Office of Economic Development – Utah’s economy is booming. Just…

|


Utah's economy: Vale Hale, the President of  Utah’s Office of Economic Development
Val Hale, the President of  Utah’s Office of Economic Development

Utah’s Economy:

The skyline of the Wasatch Front shows growth and development everywhere. But much of the growth is among homogenous corporate retail chains, restaurants, and big-box stores.

According to Val Hale, who is the President of  Utah’s Office of Economic Development, AKA GoEd – the Governor’s Office of Economic Development – Utah’s economy is booming. Just last year one million people left California and a large percentage of those people came to Utah, Arizona and Texas. “Utah’s economy is the envy of the nation,” says Hale.

Hale stopped by our office to appear on our newly launched Utah Stories podcast. We had a lengthy discussion about the future of Utah’s economy including the coming age of automation; the growing divide between the rich and the poor. We also discussed Utah’s tax revenue surplus of $1 billion as well as a growing sales tax deficit. Most importantly, we talked about how Utah leaders go about building stronger local economies for the cities they serve.

Hale oversees sixteen programs designed to build and grow Utah’s economy. They include Utah’s Office of Tourism, The Utah Film Commission, and the “corporate recruitment” programs which are designed to persuade more big corporations to located to Utah from not just California and Silicon Valley, but from all over the world.

Adobe And Goldman Sachs Huge Investments into Utah

Hale says the “poster child” for a corporate recruitment program that worked is Adobe. The state offered Adobe a big incentive after they bought out Omniture to build an additional headquarters in Lehi. Today, Adobe is doubling the size of their Utah offices. This is thanks in large part to the excellent labor pool that exists in Utah as well as the growing number of talented people who are attracted to the idea of locating to Utah.

Hale also spoke to us about how Goldman Sachs is doubling-down on the expansion of their office in Utah. They will reach up to 3,000 employees. This makes Goldman’s Utah office the fourth largest office in the world and second largest in the United States.

What Incentives Exist For Utah Small Business?

In our opinion, giving out huge sums of money, tax abatements and incentives to corporations only make our local tax base more reliant upon Wall Street to survive, and we don’t believe these efforts help but only hinder small business owners who never receive such handouts.

What I learned in talking to Mr. Hale is that these two ideals—helping both big and small businesses— are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Mr. Hale is a small business proponent, “Most businesses in Utah have between two and four employees and overall they employ far more people than the big businesses,” Hale recognizes.

When I pointed out the corporate welfare that cities hand out to entice big players such as Walmart, Cabellas, and Scheels, Hale says, “The cities compete vigorously with each other to try to get projects. This past legislative session there was some discussion about changing the whole way that sales tax is distributed so that it doesn’t become such a dog fight among cities.”

The practice of cities building incentive packages to compete against each other for big-box retail sales tax dollars clearly represents government abuse of power. Why should any big-box retailer get such as Scheels receive a huge amount of tax rebates and incentives when local businesses receive nothing? He admits that this is a problem, but says his office has nothing to do with incentivizing retail for sales tax purposes.

Hale encourages cities economic development directors to instead create an ecosystem that fosters the growth and development of small business and encourages entrepreneurs.

Hale offers a clear example in Provo:

“If you as a community can create some type of an environment where you can grow and be creative and flourish, then you have businesses there. Scott Smith was the BYU professor who started Qualtics in the basement of their house with his sons. You look at Provo and right next to each you had Ancestry.com, Vivint and Qualtircs. They practically shared the same parking lot and those three businesses got about $100 million of venture capital…They were hiring all of these people and it was just a great economic boon for the cities and the communities.”

He said that this model is a far better way to develop a strong tax base than to offer huge retailers and car dealerships big incentives.

Our conversation continued about how despite Utah having a $1 billion surplus, state leaders are currently cutting programs. To hear why this is the case, listen to our entire 35-minute podcast on Val Hale. Find it on iTunes or SoundCloud.

, ,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Utah Wants Affordable Homes. So Why Did It Kill the Starter Home Bill?

    Utah leaders have spent years talking about affordable housing.

    Governor Spencer Cox has repeatedly emphasized the need for more attainable housing, with a goal of creating tens of thousands of starter homes priced below $300,000. Yet despite broad agreement that housing affordability remains one of the state’s biggest challenges, one proposal designed specifically to encourage the construction of smaller, more affordable single-family homes failed to advance during the most recent legislative session.

    The question raises an uncomfortable issue: if Utah agrees there is a shortage of starter homes, why are those homes still so difficult to build?

    According to attorney and real estate professional Asha Klarich, much of the debate comes down to how communities want to grow and who gets to make those decisions.

    House Bill 184, known as the Small Lots and Starter Homes Amendment, was intended to reduce regulatory barriers and allow smaller homes to be built on smaller lots. The proposal would have created a process for builders and homeowners to seek exceptions to local zoning requirements and construct homes on lots as small as roughly 5,400 square feet.

    The idea was straightforward. Smaller lots generally mean lower land costs. Lower land costs can translate into lower home prices.

    For many first-time buyers, that sounds far more appealing than another apartment building or densely packed townhome development.

    “I think most people would prefer a smaller home on a smaller lot than apartment-style living in a high-rise,” Klarich said during a recent discussion about housing legislation.

    The bill ultimately failed.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • What Was Happening Inside Phillips Plaza Before the Murder in Salt Lake?

    Three days before Ralph Hoffman was killed, Utah Stories interviewed Phillips Plaza residents who described security concerns, unauthorized visitors, and questions about how vulnerable tenants were being supervised. After the murder, many of those concerns remain unanswered.


  • The Stratos Project and Corporate Power: Who Controls Utah’s Future?

    If we were all just consumers, Governor Cox, Mike Lee, Speaker Schultz, and Kevin O’Leary would have it easy. If we were just more concerned about money, jobs, and tech, and less concerned about raising our kids in communities (not in front of screens), culture, the environment, and water, those smart dudes would get exactly what they want — Stratos: a city of the future, buzzing with processors and transistors, making all of our AI dreams come true! 

    The world we could live in would be a dazzling, Mr. Wonderful kind of place. We would beat those pesky Chinese in the AI war; our AI robots could do all of our farming and ostensibly harvest the water we need for the Great Salt Lake out of thin air. But apparently, we just don’t get it. We haven’t yet reached the point predicted by Aldous Huxley’s vision in Brave New World, where we are completely distracted, dopamine-driven consumers who only need sex, drugs, and stuff to remain happy.

    Maybe Stratos will be an amazing marvel, and somehow, as Governor Cox claims, “. . . add more water to the Great Salt Lake.” But we aren’t sold. While this Stratos project has received considerable attention, it’s worth taking a step back to attempt to understand how corporate power appears to have usurped civic power.

    Civics is the practice of shaping our society through our collective voices and community involvement. Ask the residents in Tremonton, Utah how well that is working out for them. Can we still shape our world through our elected leaders? Does it matter who we vote for at the ballot box if organizations like UDOT, UTA, and MIDA can supersede our local government authority and citizen backlash? 

    The corporatization of our communities and the interests that impact our political leaders’ decision making processes are seen as far more of a concern than the average Utah resident’s concerns. Special interests and corporate power are shaping Utah’s future more than ever. 

    It’s worth asking: ‘How can we regain control over shaping Utah’s future in light of the growing power and billions that the technocrats now wield in shaping our world today?’ Amazon’s market cap exceeds the GDP of Canada. The “Magnificent Seven” tech stocks now have a greater market cap than the entire GDP of Europe ($23.6 trillion. EU countries have $19.3 trillion GDP). Will tech companies become their own nation-states and dominate their own chunks of various states? Will we become their subjects?

    There are two sides to this coin: We love Utah not just because we have the most outdoor wilderness playgrounds, but also because of Utah’s prosperity and job market. This is because Utah has become a tech hub. Our tech leadership has minted several billionaires and billion-dollar businesses. Utah offers a market and an educated workforce that more businesses and giant corporations want to be a part of. This is a benefit for even non-tech Utahns.

    The problem with this success is that as we dole out more money to attract more tech businesses, data centers, fulfillment centers, and big corporate retailers, it becomes more difficult to carve out our “sense of community.” As corporate sovereignty replaces local business sovereignty, we see that our voices and our votes matter less.

    Ask who our politicians work for, and nearly every Utahn believes they work far more for their corporate donors than they work for the average Utah citizen. So how do we best regain control over our communities?

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • What It Was Like at Weber State in the 1980s

    When Zeveloff arrived at Weber State in 1984, he entered a state that was far more isolated than the Utah most residents know today. The state was growing, but it had not yet experienced the population boom, national attention and influx of newcomers that would come in later decades. At Weber State, most professors were white, male and Mormon. Most either came from Utah or had received their graduate training there.

    Zeveloff was different in nearly every way.