Debate

Medical Marijuana in Utah

This November Utahns have one major issue on the ballot that could dramatically alter our extreme-red, hyper-conservative state: the legalization of medical marijuana.

|


This November Utahns have one major issue on the ballot that could dramatically alter our extreme-red, hyper-conservative state: the legalization of medical marijuana. The  ballot initiative Proposition Two seeks to allow residents to utilize  marijuana with a doctor’s recommendation. Currently 66 percent of Utah voters support this initiative. This would also allow for licenced growers to produce medicinal pot in Utah (more on this later).

We thought we would should examine the key political leaders’ comments, the fine print in the legislation, and see how this historic proposition might impact Utah communities and local entrepreneurs.

So How Did We Get Here?

Going back 3,000 years ago, the Chinese were extensively using medicinal marijuana. It’s medicinal properties were used widely in the United States in my drugs in the nineteenth century up until the early twentieth century. It’s very likely Mormon Pioneers used marijuana enhanced tonics and tinctures for all sorts of ailments.

 Just sixty years ago an article written in the Salt Lake Telegram, published May 20th, 1949 tells how A University of Utah researcher had found that marijuana has cured half of an epileptic patient study who used marijuana in a controlled study. But this research, while ending up in the paper wasn’t accepted by the pharmacology department at the University for further research because apparently a “synthetic marijuana” was used not the actual plant, which would have been in violation of United Nations Narcotic commission. At that time (before the DEA) they prohibited the production of the “marijuana plant”. With the limited amount of time we were able to research this we do not yet know what happened to Dr. Davis’ research and why the such promising findings were never able to see the light of day.

Just six years ago, Mitt Romney, while on the campaign trail, said, “Marijuana is dangerous for young people and communities. It’s a gateway drug and legalization would be bad for the country.” Most Utah conservatives agreed.

Today, Romney is taking a different stance. He believes marijuana needs to be reclassified by the DEA so that the FDA can be involved in testing and distribution. This way legitimate medicinal use of marijuana could be allowed in Utah and across the United States.

What changed Romney’s mind as well as the minds of so many conservatives?

It started with the indisputable evidence that CBD oil (a non-psychoactive cannabidiol from marijuana) has on patients suffering from epilepsy.  A YouTube video demonstrates how CBD helps 87% of epileptic patients, especially children. The before and after demonstration, case after case, cannot be disputed. This began mainstream acceptance followed by the many patients who found relief for anxiety, glaucoma, depression, pain and Parkinson’s all from marijuana use.

Still, Romney doesn’t support Proposition Two, his opponent Democrat Jenny Wilson does; Romney is currently leading in the polls by 26 points over Wilson.

Romney believes that the Utah State Legislature should handle the issue. Many LDS Republicans echo this sentiment, which could be interpreted as, let the LDS majority-ruling State Legislature determine what is best with marijuana policy as they currently administer state alcohol policy.

Romney specifically disagrees with Proposition 2’s initiative that would allow for private dispensaries. This, he says, would lead to “corner stores offering marijuana-laced brownies and gummies and an opening up of marijuana in schools.” Romney believes medicinal marijuana should be regulated like any other drug prescribed by doctors and regulated at pharmacies, available  at places like Walgreens rather than ma and pa shops. Further, he believes that the State Legislature should act quickly and convene a special session to address the issue, which they will be doing shortly after the November election. They have even started on the bill, which can be read online—the Libertas Institute, which has been fighting for a medical marijuana bill for the past five years, is writing the legislation. The interesting part to note in the bill they are crafting is that any grow facility will be indoors and the grower must have liquid assets of $50,000 to be licensed and accepted. This provision will certainly rule out most small farms from competing in this sure-to-be highly lucrative industry.

 Currently, many Utahns visit the neighboring states of Colorado and Nevada to purchase their medicinal and recreational marijuana. Both states have legalized recreational and medicinal marijuana use in addition to 29 other states. Utahns also purchase from Utah’s black market, benefiting criminals and the Mexican drug cartel. This clearly isn’t good for Utah’s government, tax payers, or the criminal justice system.

It’s clear that since legalizing marijuana, Colorado has seen a boon to tourism, immigration, and tax revenue. Here in Utah, the political and cultural climate is quite different.

What Has Taken Utah So Long?

Today there is far more at stake than there was in 2012, when Romney took a hard-line. Marijuana is still classified as a schedule 1 drug by the DEA—on par with ecstacy and heroin. This schedule prohibits the testing of pot for medicinal use at the federal level. Incredibly, the DEA can still raid legal pot farms in California. Still, it’s becoming increasingly clear that there are many undisputed medicinal properties of marijuana. Patients suffering from glaucoma see results in lowered IOP for up to four hours. Patients receiving chemotherapy see results in both pain relief and increased appetite. They also experience far fewer side effects than narcotics with opioids. There is also an increasing amount of evidence that when the  EC system (endocannabinoid system) in our body is activated, children suffering from autism improve in their cognitive abilities. One of the most interesting, yet still non-mainstream validated studies, reports that cancer patients when exposed to marijuana treatment respond in a similar manner to chemotherapy. Studies at Complutense University in Madrid, Spain, found efficacy in the treatment and reduction of cancerous cells using THC. In Spain, Microbiologist doctors have been testing the anti-tumor effects of canibinoids for over 15 years.

While these claims are not validated by American scientific studies or journals, patients say that the evidence is clear that a nationwide legalization and removal from DEA schedule 1 list makes sense.

We have personally witnessed the results of adding a few drops of CBD oil to our epileptic dog’s food. Our Irish Setter Joey hasn’t had a seizure since we started giving him a nightly regimen of CBD. CBD has been a miracle for families of children suffering from epilepsy. And for this reason CBD oil was legalized in Utah in 2014, and is now legal in all but two states. Still, the greater-Utah community is hesitant for a full legalization, for a few good reasons.

The Clear Dangers of Recreational-Use THC

While it’s certain that cannabis has medicinal value, the impact of heavy usage of smoking pot recreationally on cognition is clearly negative, according to all scientific evidence. While it is impossible for a person to overdose on marijuana, heavy, regular marijuana use, especially those who consume at a young age, can experience negative side effects. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, rats exposed to THC before birth had specific problems with learning and memory tasks later in life. Longitudinal studies demonstrated that cognitive abilities can be impaired by the overuse of marijuana. Impairments and reduced IQ depend on users age and level of consumption.

This problem has been exacerbated in young adults due to the increased potency of pot. Because of the  selective breeding of cannabis, THC levels have increased sixfold in the average joint in the past ten years. This makes pot for teens far more dangerous. Besides the impact it has on lowering IQ levels, it also affects how the brain stores and releases dopamine. A “high” is caused by a dopamine release in a similar way dopamine is released from cocaine. A high from marijuana is not as powerful or as addictive as cocaine, a methamphetamine, but if consumed regularly, THC levels in the brain’s chemistry adapts with less regular dopamine production, causing the user to become reliant on THC to feel normal. Everyone is likely familiar with a person who has smoked too much weed for far too long. “Potheads” have difficulty keeping jobs and maintaining productivity, so parents and kids must beware of the overusage. According to DrugAbuse.com

The long-term effects of marijuana can lead to an adverse effect on memory and learning. Those who smoke marijuana consistently when young may experience cognitive impairment as adults even when no longer using the drug. The long-term effects of marijuana can be unpredictable.”

But Marijuana Is Not As Harmful as Tobacco or Alcohol

In many respects this is true, advocates correctly demonstrate that the human body has hundreds of cannabinoid receptors in our bodies and brain, which control our appetite, motor functioning, memory and sleep. Therefore, they conclude we are made to smoke pot and control our health and wellness using it. To a degree, this is true, but we also have receptors in our brains for opioids, which doesn’t validate the regular usage heroin. Still, our perception, mood, memory, and appetite are all influenced by marijuana due to our endocannabinoid ES system, and only one in 10 marijuana users become addicted or dependent, whereas one in three smokers of tobacco become addicted. Cannabis smoked occasionally also doesn’t harm the lungs as much as tobacco smoked regularly. And even the NIH (National Institute for Health) says there is not an increased chance of lung cancer unless the user is a “heavy smoker” (smoking every night).

Still, too much of a good thing can prove bad. Heavy users of marijuana have difficulty in forming memories. Heavy use clearly impairs cognitive abilities (lifehacker.com). But occasional use and legitimate use for medicinal purposes is gaining momentum for legal passage on a Federal level and will likely pass in Utah.

How Much Tax Revenue is Utah Losing By Not Having Legal Marijuana?

So far the tax on marijuana has generated $2.75 billion in revenue to California and $1.56 billion in total tax revenue in Colorado. California realized so much revenue from pot, they decided to increase the tax to help the state and cities rebuild their crumbling infrastructure. But this excessive tax backfired:the added tax led consumers to go back to the black market, and the total tax revenue actually declined, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. California legalized recreational marijuana on January 1, and so far, both tax revenue and the impact on growers has fallen far short of expectations due to heavy-handed government regulations. Still, with the examples of 31 states, our State Legislature should be able to navigate the case studies and see how to best roll out a medicinal program.

It’s clear that it’s now time for Utah to accept the good along with the potential bad of medicinal marijuana. But it’s our hope and belief that it would be best for all Utahns if the legislature allows for local industry, local farmers, and local shops to thrive (as Proposition 2 would allow). This would be a better scenario than Big Pharma and the largest corporate players to thrive, as Mitt Romney and most of the LDS conservatives in Utah endorse. We are pleased that not all of the LDS community is in line with the Church’s stance on the issue—voters should always realize they can think and vote for themselves.

Watch our first episode of Utah Stories podcast where we examine everything you need to know regarding legalization of medical marijuana in Utah. 

Weigh in on this very important issue. We would like to hear from you.

Email us or use the contact form below.

———————————-

Editor’s note: Besides the medicinal efficacy of marijuana, it is also becoming increasingly clear that psilocybin mushrooms have properties that could be very helpful for Utahns in our growing crisis in the treatment of depression and anxiety. This is another issue that is very soon to come to the forefront of another article and discussion. We encourage readers to become informed.

 

, , , , , , , ,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Utah Homelessness Crisis: Tyler Clancy Challenges ‘Housing First’ Failures

    “It’s not normal to see someone sleeping on the sidewalk in a sleeping bag with a needle sticking out of their arm.”

    That sentence should not be controversial. In a sane society, it would barely need saying. But in Utah — where politicians, nonprofits, consultants, and bureaucrats have spent more than a decade congratulating themselves for “addressing homelessness” while the streets of Salt Lake have become more dangerous, more drug-soaked, and more morally disorienting — it lands like an indictment. And it came not from a crank, a talk-radio host, or a downtown business owner at the end of his rope, but from Tyler Clancy, Utah’s newly appointed homeless coordinator.

    That matters because if Clancy is serious — and after sitting down with him, he appears to be — then he represents something Utah’s homelessness system has not had in a very long time: someone willing to say the obvious out loud. The old script is dead. Everybody knows it, but almost nobody in power has wanted to admit it. 

    For years, Utah’s homelessness policy has been built on a polite fiction — that if we build enough units, distribute enough funding, and avoid being too “judgmental,” the crisis will gradually resolve itself. That story was easier to maintain when Utah was receiving national praise for “solving chronic homelessness.” It is much harder to sustain now, when the conditions on the ground tell a very different story.

    Magnolia Apartments opened to help alleviate homelessness, but the results were not all positive.

    Part of that failure became painfully clear over the last four years. By most accounts, former homelessness coordinator Wayne Niederhauser was a decent man and a very nice guy. But one person close to him described his tenure as that of “a tiger without stripes”— someone with the title, but not the appetite to challenge the sprawling network of nonprofits and service providers receiving millions in taxpayer dollars. That lack of accountability has had real consequences. Multiple former and current residents have told Utah Stories that of the roughly 60 original tenants who moved into Magnolia when it opened, about 20 have since died — most, they say, from accidental drug overdoses. 

    If those accounts are even close to accurate, they should have triggered a public reckoning. Instead, the system kept moving, protected by good intentions, insulated from scrutiny, and largely unbothered by outcomes that would be considered a scandal in almost any other context.

    That is the machine Clancy is stepping into, and unless he is willing to confront it directly — not just coordinate around it — his role risks becoming one more layer of management over the same failures. The reality he inherits is not complicated in the way policymakers like to suggest. It is visible, immediate, and increasingly impossible to explain away. 

    Open drug use, fentanyl addiction, untreated mental illness, rising disorder, and a growing sense among both the public and the homeless themselves all indicate that the system is not working. Complexity exists, but it has also become a convenient shield for cowardice. It is the language people use when they want to avoid saying what is plainly in front of them: Utah has spent years managing visible human collapse while calling it compassion.

    The Lie Utah Told Itself

    For years, Utah’s approach to homelessness rested on a narrative few in power were willing to question. It sounded compassionate. It polled well. And it avoided uncomfortable truths.

    Continue reading with a Utah Stories subscription. Start your 3-month free trial.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Utah Official’s $36K Travel Reimbursements Raise Questions About Use of Taxpayer Funds

    The trek into the office is a necessary evil for many employees; unpaid time that could be spent elsewhere. But some state employees are able to cash in on their commutes.

    That includes one member of Gov. Spencer Cox’s cabinet who heads the Utah Department of Cultural & Community Engagement. The department oversees a number of civic and social programs ranging from museums, libraries and the state historical society, to volunteerism efforts and multicultural affairs. 

    The employee’s in-state travel expenses made up a large chunk of the department’s employee reimbursements in recent years, according to documents obtained by The Utah Investigative Journalism Project obtained through a public records request. 

    The UIJP reviewed spreadsheets detailing the reimbursed expenses of the department’s 17-person leadership team over the 2024 and 2025 fiscal years. 

    The analysis showed one employee, Executive Director Donna Law, accounted for nearly a third of the team’s reimbursements in 2024 and 43% in 2025. Law, who lives in Cedar City, spent more than 11 times the average amount spent by all other employees included in the analysis. 

    The majority of Law’s expenses were categorized as in-state travel, which includes mileage and lodging. Between the two years, she spent $21,607.94 on lodging, $10,135.42  on auto mileage, and $1,455.00 in miscellaneous travel expenses and meals for a total of over $33,000. 

    The next highest amount spent on in-state travel was $3,385. Law’s overall spending far exceeded any other employee.

    The nearly $36,000 Law spent on travel and other items wasnearly three times that spent by the employee with the second highest amount in reimbursements. His expenses, in contrast, were largely out-of-state travel.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • The $7 Million Recruit: How NIL Changed College Athletics Forever

    In 2012, Jabari Parker, a top high school prospect and member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was facing his biggest decision to that point in his life: where to play college basketball. 

    Fans of BYU athletics hoped and perhaps prayed that Parker would pick the school owned by the church he was raised in. BYU was listed as one of his final choices. But he ultimately chose to spend his college years at Duke before attempting a career in the NBA. BYU fans were disappointed, but no one was truly surprised. Duke over BYU was the best choice for a young prospect in 2012. 

    A.J. Dybantsa.

    What changed between 2012 and 2024 when A.J. Dybantsa, the number one high school prospect, chose BYU over every other school? The answer is roughly $7 million dollars. That is what Dybantsa is reportedly making to play basketball at BYU. 

    The deal was supported by Utah Jazz owner Ryan Smith, who met multiple times with the Dybantsa family in multiple attempts to bring the young player to Provo. 

    According to Smith, he had no financial role in bringing Dybantsa to BYU, but the influence of Utah’s most famous billionaire acting as a “booster” or unofficial recruiter certainly swayed the decision.

    Prior to 2021, boosters acting as recruiters was taboo to the NCAA governing body. It was called improper recruiting. But in 2021, California began the modern era of NIL, or the ability of a college athlete to benefit from their name, image, or likeness, when they passed the “Fair Pay to Play Act.” 

    This new law gave college athletes in California the ability to benefit from their NIL, something that was banned in the rest of the country to that point. The NCAA saw that this law would create an unfair advantage for California schools that could now give young athletes the chance to make money off their talent and image while still in college. 

    The NCAA knew they needed to do something quickly, so they rushed through a policy that opened up NIL to all college athletes in the country, and it has been expanding and evolving over the last four years. 

    Grant Duff, who has coached at the University of Utah, Weber State University, and is now the defensive coordinator for Idaho State University, says, “The best part of NIL is that athletes have an opportunity to make good money. The downside comes with the free-for-all that money causes.”

    Dybantsa confers with BYU Head coach, Kevin Young.

    One of the biggest current examples of what a school can do when the boosters are willing to pay for success is Texas Tech University. From 2020-2024, Texas Tech had 34 wins, which works out to 6.8 wins per year with a low of 4 wins and high of 8. Then Texas Tech’s boosters got involved, led by Cody Campbell, an oil industry businessman and Chairman of the Texas Tech board. The football program was given 28 million dollars for NIL with a simple message attached to the large pile of money: Win. And win now. And win they did. 

    By signing NIL deals with athletes in the transfer portal, Texas Tech went from a middle-of-the-pack school in their conference to one of the top 12 teams in the country. They didn’t just win games in 2025, they made many of their opponents look like they didn’t belong on the same field, including the University of Utah and BYU twice. That is what money can buy.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Cottonwood Heights Corruption Allegations: A Case That Never Reached a Courtroom

    A year ago, we here at Utah Stories recorded a podcast episode that we never published. We were revisiting corruption allegations from ten years ago. We decided not to publish the video, so it sat there on YouTube for nearly 12 months.

    Then somehow the video was published. How? We are not sure, but once it got out there, the comments came pouring in.

    Dozens of viewers, then hundreds, supported the video with their comments on our examination of allegations of police misconduct in Cottonwood Heights. The video recounts how the Police Department was reported by business owners as focusing enforcement on customers of the former Canyon Inn bar. These allegations did not result in a publicly documented, full investigation by Utah’s Justice Department nor the FBI (at least to our knowledge). So why rehash the past?

    We believe the story of The Canyon Inn (and other area business owners) vs. CHPD and Cottonwood Heights Mayor Kelvin Cullimore raises questions about what can happen when allegations surface and do not move forward through a formal legal process with state or federal oversight.

    In 2012, Cottonwood Heights business owners at the mouth of the canyons began publicly objecting to police activity whereby up to seven cruisers were pulling over 711 and Canyon Inn bar customers on their busiest evenings.

    According to those accounts, drivers leaving the bar were frequently pulled over by police and were given DUI tickets, sometimes even after passing a sobriety examination. The volume and concentration of those stops led residents and business owners to complain about the “heavy-handed treatment” of CHPD toward motorists, especially in and around the Canyon Inn and neighboring 711, and eventually the Porcupine Pub.

    Customers responded in predictable ways. Some chose not to return and avoid the area. Others went to different establishments. Over time, the owner of the Canyon Inn, Jim Stojack, stated that his revenue declined by 70% and that he believed police activity near his business was the main contributing factor.

    Utah Stories reported on these concerns by conducting interviews; gathering video documentation provided by those involved; and making public records requests. Through our GRAMA requests, we reviewed DUI citations issued by the Cottonwood Heights Police Department and examined how those cases were resolved in Holladay Justice Court. During that period, we observed a higher number based on our review of DUI cases dismissed in court due to lack of evidence compared to other jurisdictions. One DUI attorney, Tyler Ayers, went on record saying that CHPD was issuing a high volume of DUI citations that were later dismissed.

    That observation raised questions about how cases were being documented and prosecuted. It did not, on its own, establish intent or misconduct, but it became part of a broader set of concerns raised by multiple sources.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).