Mysteries

Are You a Victim of The Mandela Effect?

Is the Mandela Effect a product of us unknowingly sliding into other dimensions, a 1984-like memory control, or a natural phenomenon of false memories?

|


Christiania / Nelson Mandela

I’m sure you’ve heard or even used the phrase, “Life is like a box of chocolates,” from the acclaimed film, Forrest Gump. No? How about the time you and some friends were reminiscing about the classic, Return of the Jedi, and one of you, in your best James Earl Jones voice, said, “Luke, I am your father”?

What about Ann Rice’s book, and later, movie, Interview with a Vampire (notice anything strange)? How about the wildly popular book and television series, The Berenstein bears?

Now what if I told you that Forrest Gump never said, “Life is like a box of chocolates,” but instead, “Life was like a box of chocolates”; or that Darth Vader never included Luke’s name in, arguably, one of the most famous cinematic lines ever, but had the interjection, “no,” in its stead (“No, I am your father.”); or that Interview with a Vampire, either the book or the movie, never existed, because the title never contained an indefinite article (Interview with the Vampire), and is merely a misnomer; or, similarly, that there was never a book series or a television show titled, The Berenstein Bears—it has always been The BerenSTAIN Bears?

These are just a few of many examples of glitches in memory and mental oddities in how we as a society hold onto false memories. These are examples of what is now known as The Mandela Effect.

There are few conversation starters that begin with such nostalgic confusion as bringing to notion that these quotes, these titles, and many more memories we hold collectively as a society are not only wrong, they never existed in the first place.

Sinbad never played a genie in a film from the 90s, despite a vitriolic fire of contrary belief sweeping across the web. Pikachu’s tail has never been black-tipped. Famous Rich Uncle Pennybags, the beloved Monopoly character, never sported a monocle.

Before I explain further, and before you stampede to the Google Gadget, let me assure you—I am not wrong. These are all common examples that have caused a great amount of strife and confusion among the masses equally. Certainly one, if not all, of these examples has you scratching your head; and I was in the same paradoxical bewilderment.

“Life was like a box of chocolates.” It certainly was, despite what a lot of us remember with scary certainty—or do we?

The Mandela effect, a term coined by Fiona Broome, who, along with thousands, was certain Nelson Mandela died in prison in the late 80s, despite the fact he didn’t pass until late 2013—she even has a distinct memory of watching the funeral on television—is what happens when a large group of unconnected people harbor the exact same memory with the exact same details, even though these recollections are not supported by history books, newspaper archives, etc. This strange phenomenon has traveled the distance of the Internet like a flash-fire in recent years.

There are a slew of theories surrounding this quandary—from the fun and abstract explanation that these memories did happen, only in a different dimension along the same timeline in which we’ve slipped into and back again, to a purely natural phenomena.

The concept of false memory is not new; however, the scope of just how many people share the exact memory of certain things that never existed is startling and eerie. The Mandela effect is a peculiar look at how unconscious memories can be conditioned through the endless scope of seamless inter connectivity people have with one another, especially with the advent of the internet.

Do people remember “Luke, I am your father” more than “No, I am your father” simply because of how common phonetics and syntax is processed in our minds? Do we remember The Berenstain Bears as “stein” simply because of the unwavering prominence of Stein’s in our everyday life?

While language and conditioning is an integral aspect to conceptualize when trying to decipher the bizarre nature of the Mandela Effect, it does not explain why it is also associated with visual memory also. Have we been thoroughly affected by the over-saturation of advertising, causing us to mistake Mr. Peanuts for Mr. Pennybags (And why does everyone remember him as Mr. Moneybags? Maybe because the first association everyone makes with Monopoly is money?)?

Recently, a friend asked me about something in The Neverending Story. “What color do you remember Gmork’s [the wolf] eyes?” What do you remember? Red? Yellow? Much against common memory, they are actually neon green.

These are real enough memories that, even when confronted with contrary evidence, people will fervently argue they are not wrong.

In this modern age, we are now able to widely communicate about the idiosyncratic caveats of the human mind and how our memories are conditioned and acted upon. If nothing, The Mandela Effect begs the question: how much pride do we put into our own memories, and how do they affect our life?

Whether the Mandela Effect is a glitch in the matrix or a glitch in collective memory—it is a conversational spark regarding how we absorb information in a world of overly-saturated media, and for some, an existential slip into the strange world of parallel universes, or worse.

So with your mind riddled, shake off the self-doubt, and ask yourself—how will you remember this?

 

,

Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Artist Kate Kilpatrick Brings Utah’s History to Life Through Murals

    “I think we’re all interconnected; as individuals as well as societies,” Kilpatrick notes. Her work showcases those connections exuberantly, and whatever scale she’s working on, you can bet that in terms of energy and spirit, she’s painting large.


  • Why Most People Stay Stuck in Business and What It Takes to Move Forward

    Every so often, you meet an immigrant who came here with almost nothing and managed to build something exceptional.

    Prakash Shah is the kind of man who has spent enough time around risk that he no longer treats it like an interruption.

    Today, he works in business brokerage and advisory, helping owners sell companies, helping buyers decide whether they should step in, and, when the fit is right, helping connect those buyers with private equity. He works in a world of valuations, leverage, due diligence, and hard questions that most people would rather postpone. He also operates in Utah real estate and has built a career around seeing value before it is obvious to everyone else. That is who he is now. What makes him interesting is how early that instinct started to form, and how little his life resembles the way most Americans are raised to think about comfort, career, and security.

    He grew up in Nepal in a boarding school system that would feel severe to many Americans. He was an only child, yet he saw his parents only twice a year for twelve straight years, until high school graduation. He lived inside routine. He shared space with boys from different social classes and different family circumstances. The school was structured enough that money did not buy you any special standing once you were inside. Everyone followed the same rules. Everyone was subject to the same discipline. In his case, it was an army school. Everything was measured. Everything was scheduled. In that kind of environment, you do not build your life around preference. You build it around adaptation.

    That contrast matters.

    A lot of American children are raised to search for what fits them. What are you passionate about? What do you enjoy? What feels right? Those are not bad questions, but they can create a habit of waiting for life to align itself before action begins. Prakash learned something else much earlier. He learned that life often does not align itself first. You enter the room as it is, you deal with the people in it, and you figure out how to function without making your comfort the center of every decision. He said that one of the biggest lessons from those years was tolerance, the ability to live with people from all walks of life and genuinely learn to get along with them. That is not a soft value. In business, it turns into resilience. In negotiation, it turns into patience. In career terms, it turns into range.

    When he came to the United States over 25 years ago, he did not arrive with the kind of runway that allows for a prolonged identity search. He came with two suitcases and enough money for one semester. He went to Hunter College in New York City, then to NYIT near Central Park, studying media and then media and technology management. He also studied psychology. Those details matter because they show something about his mind. He was interested in people before he built a career around deals. Even then, what attracted him was not technical prestige. It was understanding motives, behavior, and how people reveal themselves.

    But New York is merciless toward vague ambition. It demands payment in rent, transit, food, and time.

    Prakash worked constantly. He took multiple jobs. He paid tuition, paid rent, and skipped most of what Americans imagine as college life. There were no romantic years of drifting from café to concert to self-discovery. He talked about not having the luxury of dates, travel, or finding himself. He was working. Even laundry was not a small detail. In New York, he pointed out, you do not just throw clothes in a machine at home. You haul them to the laundromat, count quarters, and measure what is necessary. He also described distraction in a way that most native-born Americans probably do not think about. For immigrants, distraction is not always pleasure. Sometimes distraction is the constant pressure of competing needs. Tuition or rent. Food or savings. A better coat or another month of making do. He was not romanticizing the struggle. He was describing the arithmetic of it.

    That arithmetic did not make him cautious. If anything, it did the opposite.

    While in college, he had the option of safer analytical work. Instead, he took a sales job with Time Warner Cable that sent him into the South Bronx from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. to knock on doors. He is not a physically imposing man. He knew exactly what kind of neighborhoods he was walking into. He described apartment buildings where people kept pit bulls, where tension was normal, where one mistake in tone or timing could end a conversation immediately. For most people, that kind of job would have been something to survive and forget. For him, it became a school in human behavior. “It’s not about talking… it’s about listening,” he said.

    One story from that period says almost everything about how he operates. He knocked on a door one night around 8:45 and found himself facing a huge man with a gun on the table, pit bulls nearby, and a half-eaten pizza in front of him. It had all the ingredients of a very bad scene.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Ancient Pyramid Discovered in Sugar House Park, Salt Lake City

    A Salt Lake City resident says he may have uncovered what he believes to be a buried structure beneath a well-known hill in Sugar House Park, raising questions that have drawn both curiosity and skepticism.


  • Utah Fits All Scholarship Applications Open Through April 30 for K–12 Students

    Utah families have more learning paths than ever and, increasingly, more ways to make those paths affordable. This spring, the Utah Fits All Scholarship opened  for new family applications on April 1, and the application window stays open for one month. The program is a public K–12 scholarship that provides $4,000 to $8,000 per student,…