Podcast

AI Can’t Turn a Wrench: Why Skilled Trades Are the Future of Work

As AI takes over more white-collar jobs, trades rooted in human skill and intuition are rising in value. At Clarks Auto, Alan Boyer shares why hands-on work still matters — and how raising curious, capable kids today could shape the workforce of tomorrow.

|

Alan Boyer with son at Clarks Auto

Artificial intelligence is coming for millions of jobs, but it still can’t turn a wrench. That’s the reality Alan Boyer, owner of Clarks Auto in Salt Lake City, sees every day from his shop floor. While AI is rewriting the future of white-collar work, the world still runs on people who know how to fix things, build things, and solve problems with their hands.

“I don’t see AI replacing the guy turning a wrench anytime soon,” Alan says. “It can’t hear a noise, feel a vibration, or smell a gas leak. Those are the intuitive things that make great technicians.”

For decades, trade jobs were seen as a fallback for people who didn’t go to college. Parents pushed their kids toward four-year degrees, schools cut shop classes, and society decided that sitting behind a screen was the pinnacle of success. But now, as AI outpaces humans in knowledge and automation creeps into cubicles, those same trades are emerging as some of the most future-proof careers around.

Alan has already seen the shift firsthand. A few years ago, a CNC programmer, the person writing the code that tells machining equipment how to shape metal, could earn a high salary. But today, AI can write that code in seconds. “I asked AI how to program a part for one of our machines,” he says. “It gave me the code immediately. I copied it to a thumb drive, plugged it into the machine, and it went to work. We just stood there stunned.”

The people who actually run the machines, load the parts, and inspect the work? Their jobs aren’t going anywhere. They might even make more than the programmers they used to answer to.

The same story is playing out in auto repair. Diagnostic tools powered by AI can help identify problems faster than ever, but they can’t crawl under a car, loosen a rusted bolt, or sense when something doesn’t sound right. Those jobs, and the deep, hard-earned intuition that comes with them, still belong to humans.

And yet, Boyer is quick to point out that rejecting AI is the wrong move. “The quickest way to make ourselves obsolete is to not use it,” he says. “We’ve embraced it. We use AI to help write standard operating procedures, to analyze data, even to help troubleshoot tricky repairs. It’s another tool, like fuel injection was in the ’80s or online manuals in the ’90s.”

That mindset, adapting rather than resisting, is one Alan wishes more people would apply to work and education. The problem, he argues, isn’t that AI is taking jobs. It’s that our culture has forgotten how to value the jobs AI can’t take.

Mike Rowe, host of Dirty Jobs and one of the nation’s most vocal advocates for trades, made this point before Congress years ago. America has millions of open positions in skilled trades, yet many go unfilled because of stigma. Politicians promised “shovel-ready jobs,” but few people wanted to pick up a shovel.

Alan believes the way to change that begins long before kids enter the workforce. It starts with chores, with building work ethic at home, and with schools bringing back the hands-on classes that used to teach kids how to use tools, work with metal, and build things. “It starts with taking the trash out. Mowing the lawn. Doing the little things,” he says. “By the time I was in diesel school, instructors were telling us how to prepare for long, hot days working outside. That’s where you learn the value of hard work.”

He sees a paradox in how kids are raised today. “People out here will get up at five in the morning to hike the Wasatch or climb rock faces,” Alan says. “But they won’t work all day on a truck or plumb a house. It’s the same physical effort, just pointed at something else.”

Screens, he argues, are part of the problem. Children today spend countless hours scrolling social media, developing gnat-like attention spans and little patience for physical work. Since the rise of social media, depression among teenage girls has surged by 90 percent. “The screen should be a tool,” Alan says. “It can’t be your world.”

That shift has far-reaching consequences. If kids grow up without curiosity, the instinct to take things apart, understand how they work, and try to build something new, they’re unlikely to pursue the trades that keep society running. “Curiosity is everything,” Alan says. “It’s what makes someone a great technician. It’s how I learned, taking apart bikes, figuring out how to cross rivers on motorcycles, building snorkels out of plumbing parts. You can’t learn that from a screen.”

At Clarks Auto, Alan tries to pass that spirit on to the next generation. He takes his son to land speed racing events on the Bonneville Salt Flats, where teams push cars beyond 400 mph. Most of these teams don’t have engineers or corporate backing, just passion, skill, and a deep desire to solve complex problems. “These old-timers out there would grab my son by the shoulders and say, ‘We need you. We need kids like you in mechanics and racing.’”

He’s convinced that planting those seeds early, letting kids get dirty, use tools, and work with their hands, is how we solve the skilled labor shortage. And the solution is about more than just jobs. It’s about preserving something essential to human identity. “We evolved to break rocks and build things,” Alan says. “We’ve got to tap into that again.”

Even with all the talk about robotics and automation, Boyer isn’t worried about mechanics being replaced anytime soon. Robots still struggle with tasks requiring fine motor skills. Pouring a cup of coffee is a challenge, let alone rebuilding an engine. And while remote surgeries and drone piloting show what’s possible with human-controlled machines, the key word there is still human.

Alan’s message is simple but urgent: the future belongs to those who adapt to technology without abandoning the skills AI can’t replicate. And those skills, curiosity, intuition, craftsmanship, problem-solving, are forged not on screens, but in garages, gardens, and workshops.

“AI is powerful,” he says. “But it can’t feel, it can’t fix, and it can’t build. That’s still up to us.”

, ,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Left in a Box as a Baby: Trauma, Alcoholism, and Addiction

    A man abandoned as a baby builds a structured life in law enforcement, but unresolved trauma and alcoholism slowly begin to unravel it. His story raises a harder question about how change actually happens.


  • The $7 Million Recruit: How NIL Changed College Athletics Forever

    In 2012, Jabari Parker, a top high school prospect and member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was facing his biggest decision to that point in his life: where to play college basketball. 

    Fans of BYU athletics hoped and perhaps prayed that Parker would pick the school owned by the church he was raised in. BYU was listed as one of his final choices. But he ultimately chose to spend his college years at Duke before attempting a career in the NBA. BYU fans were disappointed, but no one was truly surprised. Duke over BYU was the best choice for a young prospect in 2012. 

    A.J. Dybantsa.

    What changed between 2012 and 2024 when A.J. Dybantsa, the number one high school prospect, chose BYU over every other school? The answer is roughly $7 million dollars. That is what Dybantsa is reportedly making to play basketball at BYU. 

    The deal was supported by Utah Jazz owner Ryan Smith, who met multiple times with the Dybantsa family in multiple attempts to bring the young player to Provo. 

    According to Smith, he had no financial role in bringing Dybantsa to BYU, but the influence of Utah’s most famous billionaire acting as a “booster” or unofficial recruiter certainly swayed the decision.

    Prior to 2021, boosters acting as recruiters was taboo to the NCAA governing body. It was called improper recruiting. But in 2021, California began the modern era of NIL, or the ability of a college athlete to benefit from their name, image, or likeness, when they passed the “Fair Pay to Play Act.” 

    This new law gave college athletes in California the ability to benefit from their NIL, something that was banned in the rest of the country to that point. The NCAA saw that this law would create an unfair advantage for California schools that could now give young athletes the chance to make money off their talent and image while still in college. 

    The NCAA knew they needed to do something quickly, so they rushed through a policy that opened up NIL to all college athletes in the country, and it has been expanding and evolving over the last four years. 

    Grant Duff, who has coached at the University of Utah, Weber State University, and is now the defensive coordinator for Idaho State University, says, “The best part of NIL is that athletes have an opportunity to make good money. The downside comes with the free-for-all that money causes.”

    Dybantsa confers with BYU Head coach, Kevin Young.

    One of the biggest current examples of what a school can do when the boosters are willing to pay for success is Texas Tech University. From 2020-2024, Texas Tech had 34 wins, which works out to 6.8 wins per year with a low of 4 wins and high of 8. Then Texas Tech’s boosters got involved, led by Cody Campbell, an oil industry businessman and Chairman of the Texas Tech board. The football program was given 28 million dollars for NIL with a simple message attached to the large pile of money: Win. And win now. And win they did. 

    By signing NIL deals with athletes in the transfer portal, Texas Tech went from a middle-of-the-pack school in their conference to one of the top 12 teams in the country. They didn’t just win games in 2025, they made many of their opponents look like they didn’t belong on the same field, including the University of Utah and BYU twice. That is what money can buy.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Cottonwood Heights Corruption Allegations: A Case That Never Reached a Courtroom

    A year ago, we here at Utah Stories recorded a podcast episode that we never published. We were revisiting corruption allegations from ten years ago. We decided not to publish the video, so it sat there on YouTube for nearly 12 months.

    Then somehow the video was published. How? We are not sure, but once it got out there, the comments came pouring in.

    Dozens of viewers, then hundreds, supported the video with their comments on our examination of allegations of police misconduct in Cottonwood Heights. The video recounts how the Police Department was reported by business owners as focusing enforcement on customers of the former Canyon Inn bar. These allegations did not result in a publicly documented, full investigation by Utah’s Justice Department nor the FBI (at least to our knowledge). So why rehash the past?

    We believe the story of The Canyon Inn (and other area business owners) vs. CHPD and Cottonwood Heights Mayor Kelvin Cullimore raises questions about what can happen when allegations surface and do not move forward through a formal legal process with state or federal oversight.

    In 2012, Cottonwood Heights business owners at the mouth of the canyons began publicly objecting to police activity whereby up to seven cruisers were pulling over 711 and Canyon Inn bar customers on their busiest evenings.

    According to those accounts, drivers leaving the bar were frequently pulled over by police and were given DUI tickets, sometimes even after passing a sobriety examination. The volume and concentration of those stops led residents and business owners to complain about the “heavy-handed treatment” of CHPD toward motorists, especially in and around the Canyon Inn and neighboring 711, and eventually the Porcupine Pub.

    Customers responded in predictable ways. Some chose not to return and avoid the area. Others went to different establishments. Over time, the owner of the Canyon Inn, Jim Stojack, stated that his revenue declined by 70% and that he believed police activity near his business was the main contributing factor.

    Utah Stories reported on these concerns by conducting interviews; gathering video documentation provided by those involved; and making public records requests. Through our GRAMA requests, we reviewed DUI citations issued by the Cottonwood Heights Police Department and examined how those cases were resolved in Holladay Justice Court. During that period, we observed a higher number based on our review of DUI cases dismissed in court due to lack of evidence compared to other jurisdictions. One DUI attorney, Tyler Ayers, went on record saying that CHPD was issuing a high volume of DUI citations that were later dismissed.

    That observation raised questions about how cases were being documented and prosecuted. It did not, on its own, establish intent or misconduct, but it became part of a broader set of concerns raised by multiple sources.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • From LDS Mission to Heroin Addiction: A Utah Man’s Descent and Recovery

    More than 100,000 Americans died from drug overdoses in a single year. That number is often repeated, rarely absorbed, and almost never understood in a way that forces real reflection. Because addiction doesn’t usually look like chaos at the beginning.