satire

Utah Couple Turns Marriage Into Political Combat

She’s a vegan feminist. He’s a gun-owning conservative. For Karen and Jeremiah, political combat isn’t a crisis—it’s the glue holding them together.

|

Utah couple poilitical marriage.

Journalists, by nature, are nosy. We prowl cafés and eavesdrop in bars under the noble guise of “investigative reporting.” Sometimes, we stumble upon headlines. Other times, we stumble into case studies that give us a clearer glimpse into the state of our collective delusion.

Such was the case of Karen and Jeremiah.

I was at a Salt Lake City gastropub, pretending to sip Gin and Tonic, while trying to overhear a conversation between a real estate developer-turned-politician and a high-profile city official. But instead of juicy corruption, I got something far more baffling: Karen and Jeremiah, arguing loudly two stools down the bar about Trump’s foreign policy.

Karen, a dainty, well-preserved forty-something dressed like a Vogue editor, was sparring with Jeremiah, a muscular, sunburned man who radiated the kind of rugged individualism (or toxic masculinity) you’d expect from someone who owns four guns and a hunting dog named Reagan.

The verbal sparring was impossible to ignore. When my original targets exited — likely to discuss zoning laws in the privacy of a Mercedes — I introduced myself.

Karen and Jeremiah had been married for fifteen years. They met due to a glitch in a short-lived dating app called “TruePairs” (which folded faster than a paper straw in a Diet Coke). Apparently, too many East Coast vegans got matched with Utah gun enthusiasts. But Karen and Jeremiah were one of the rare “success” stories.

Karen, a New York transplant, had been vegan since 18, marched for women’s rights, protested factory farms, and donated monthly to NPR. Jeremiah was born and raised in a secretive polygamist compound off Redwood Road. He had 28 siblings, hunted elk by the age of 10, and didn’t question why he had six aunts living on the same block until a fifth-grade civics project revealed the facts.

When they met — at Brewvies, naturally — it was love at first sight. The chemistry was undeniable. Politics didn’t come up until their fifth date. By then, it was too late. They were already addicted to each other’s outrage.

Their relationship flourished in a bizarre ecosystem of mutual exasperation and bewilderment. Karen found Jeremiah’s childhood “fascinating in a disturbing National Geographic sort of way.” Jeremiah said Karen’s kombucha smelled like his uncle’s foot fungus but drank it anyway to prove a point.

In 2016, their first major fight erupted. Karen was a Hillary die-hard. Jeremiah made his own Vote for Trump T-shirts. Their Sugar House home became infamous for displaying both candidates’ signs on the same lawn — confusing every dog walker within a five-block radius. They’d wake up at 3am to sabotage each other’s signage.

When Trump won, Karen spiraled into a depression so profound she considered buying a cabin in Vermont and raising goats. But Jeremiah — shockingly tender — held her hand through the panic attacks and NPR marathons.

When Biden won in 2020, it was Jeremiah’s turn to unravel. “We elected a senile imbecile,” he grumbled. Karen made him soup and played him vintage Reagan speeches until he calmed down.

By 2024, things had escalated. Karen was volunteering for Kamala’s Utah Women for Progress initiative. Jeremiah swore he’d move to Texas if she won. The arguments turned nuclear.

In a moment of self-preservation they tried marriage counseling. After four months, they learned to speak without yelling. They started validating each other’s opinions. They even used “I feel” statements.

And it was excruciatingly dull.

“Getting along is not as exciting,” Karen confessed with a sigh. “Jeremiah started agreeing with me. I missed throwing quinoa at him.”

So they quit therapy and returned to their old dynamic where ideological warfare was their love language.

Their love was never rational. But in a country divided by red and blue, maybe the most subversive thing two people can do is stay married for the sake of the fight.

*Editor’s Note: This article is a work of satire and is intended for entertainment and commentary purposes only. While it may reference real places or echo real events, the characters and situations are fictionalized for humor and reflection. At Utah Stories, we believe that sometimes the absurd reveals more truth than the facts alone.

,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Dyslexia and ADHD in Kids: Why Some Students Struggle to Read in School

    That’s what led to my conversation with Donell Pons, a Utah-based dyslexia expert who has spent more than two decades working with students who struggle to read. What struck me right away is how often we get the problem wrong from the start.


  • Ancient Pyramid Discovered in Sugar House Park, Salt Lake City

    A Salt Lake City resident says he may have uncovered what he believes to be a buried structure beneath a well-known hill in Sugar House Park, raising questions that have drawn both curiosity and skepticism.


  • Left in a Box as a Baby: Trauma, Alcoholism, and Addiction

    A man abandoned as a baby builds a structured life in law enforcement, but unresolved trauma and alcoholism slowly begin to unravel it. His story raises a harder question about how change actually happens.


  • Cottonwood Heights Corruption Allegations: A Case That Never Reached a Courtroom

    A year ago, we here at Utah Stories recorded a podcast episode that we never published. We were revisiting corruption allegations from ten years ago. We decided not to publish the video, so it sat there on YouTube for nearly 12 months.

    Then somehow the video was published. How? We are not sure, but once it got out there, the comments came pouring in.

    Dozens of viewers, then hundreds, supported the video with their comments on our examination of allegations of police misconduct in Cottonwood Heights. The video recounts how the Police Department was reported by business owners as focusing enforcement on customers of the former Canyon Inn bar. These allegations did not result in a publicly documented, full investigation by Utah’s Justice Department nor the FBI (at least to our knowledge). So why rehash the past?

    We believe the story of The Canyon Inn (and other area business owners) vs. CHPD and Cottonwood Heights Mayor Kelvin Cullimore raises questions about what can happen when allegations surface and do not move forward through a formal legal process with state or federal oversight.

    In 2012, Cottonwood Heights business owners at the mouth of the canyons began publicly objecting to police activity whereby up to seven cruisers were pulling over 711 and Canyon Inn bar customers on their busiest evenings.

    According to those accounts, drivers leaving the bar were frequently pulled over by police and were given DUI tickets, sometimes even after passing a sobriety examination. The volume and concentration of those stops led residents and business owners to complain about the “heavy-handed treatment” of CHPD toward motorists, especially in and around the Canyon Inn and neighboring 711, and eventually the Porcupine Pub.

    Customers responded in predictable ways. Some chose not to return and avoid the area. Others went to different establishments. Over time, the owner of the Canyon Inn, Jim Stojack, stated that his revenue declined by 70% and that he believed police activity near his business was the main contributing factor.

    Utah Stories reported on these concerns by conducting interviews; gathering video documentation provided by those involved; and making public records requests. Through our GRAMA requests, we reviewed DUI citations issued by the Cottonwood Heights Police Department and examined how those cases were resolved in Holladay Justice Court. During that period, we observed a higher number based on our review of DUI cases dismissed in court due to lack of evidence compared to other jurisdictions. One DUI attorney, Tyler Ayers, went on record saying that CHPD was issuing a high volume of DUI citations that were later dismissed.

    That observation raised questions about how cases were being documented and prosecuted. It did not, on its own, establish intent or misconduct, but it became part of a broader set of concerns raised by multiple sources.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).