Community Relations

Utah Lawmakers Move to Block Public Records Access—And Make You Pay for It

Utah lawmakers are attempting to gut your right to know—slamming the door on public records and making sure you foot the bill if you dare to fight back. Corrupt officials couldn’t ask for a better deal.

|

Utah Capitol Building

The following was written by The Utah Investigative Journalism Project in partnership with Utah News Dispatch. Reprinted under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. 

Utah lawmakers are not only trying to close off your access to records about how the government does (or doesn’t) work — they want you to pay the bill for it.

Two bills are taking direct aim at the public’s right to know and they are shooting through the session like a bullet.

HB69 At first this bill was focused almost entirely on election and voter records. Then at that last minute, Sen. Calvin Musselman, R-West Haven, snuck in language to make it nearly impossible for someone who sues the government over denied records and wins to recover attorney fees. 

In 2019 my nonprofit The Utah Investigative Journalism Project sought records of how a nonprofit was spending millions in taxpayer dollars to lobby for the delisting of the gray wolf. We won at the state records committee but had to take the matter to court. We thankfully got pro bono legal counsel that got us the records we were after showing the head of the nonprofit was using the money to pay his younger brother as an employee. But it was a long and costly fight that lasted almost four years. During that time our attorneys racked up six figures in expenses. 

Our small nonprofit would have never been able to afford that legal representation on our own. And those attorneys would not be able to take a case like that in the future if it meant being denied just compensation for exposing government secrets.

But here’s the even scarier part — if this bill passes, any government agency knows they can deny ANY citizen’s request for records, not just journalists, take it to court and know the other side will likely back down because they can’t afford the legal bills.

Worried about how your city, county or the state is spending your tax dollars? Guess what, if you request records and they don’t want to give them to you, they can use their government attorney — PAID WITH YOUR TAX DOLLARS — to take it to court and that will be that.

Keep in mind every government agency has a lawyer or can hire one with taxpayer funds. And some agencies are just chock full of them. Even some agencies that have been riddled with controversy for over a decade *cough Utah Attorney General’s Office cough.*

The bill says that attorney fees can be recovered if it’s proven that the records denial was done in “bad faith.” But that is a ridiculously high burden to get over. And if you haven’t noticed, lawyers are paid and duty bound to defend their client’s position even if it is in bad faith — especially if it’s in bad faith! 

It shouldn’t be a surprise that the best lawyers tend to defend the guiltiest clients. Alan Dershowitz is one of the most successful criminal defense attorneys in the country and has defended high-profile clients like OJ Simpson. He once noted that the oath to tell the “whole truth” only applies to witnesses in court. For lawyers, what matters most is winning.

“The American justice system is built on a foundation of not telling the truth,” Dershowitz said in his book “The Best Defense.”

SB277 Sen. Mike McKell, R-Spanish Fork, has a bill that will replace the State Records Committee, an independent body that decides on records disputes, with a single lawyer appointed by the governor and approved by the Senate.

That’s a red flag on its own, but worse is that the bill takes out of state law the “balancing test.” 

The “balancing test” says that when the public’s right to know and the government’s right to secrecy are equal, then the public’s right to know wins out and an otherwise protected government record should be made public.

It gets worse. Previously government lawyers could argue that a public record be made confidential if there was a compelling reason, but they also had to argue against the balancing test. If this bill passed a judge could hear the government’s argument for secrecy but would not be able to consider the public’s right to know.

Now government lawyers will have more power and more financial incentive to block public records previously considered 100% public under the law. 

With these two bills the scales of justice, balancing secrecy against open government, will be slammed down against the public.

Eric Peterson is the Executive Director of The Utah Investigative Journalism Project and a board member of the Utah Headliners Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists.

Feature Image: Photo by Chris An on Unsplash

, ,

Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • From Water Bottles to “Brain Rot”: Classroom Trends Shaping Student Culture in 2026

    What may sound like noise or nonsense to adults often carries meaning inside today’s classrooms. From oversized, sticker-covered water bottles to repeated phrases borrowed from online videos, small habits have become shared language among students. This is what student culture looks like heading into 2026.


  • Has Utah’s Soft-on-Crime Justice Reform Made Communities Safer?

    Has this “soft-on-crime” approach resulted in safer streets?

    SALT LAKE CITY — A decade has passed since former Utah Governor Gary Herbert signed a massive justice reform bill into law in hopes that the state could reduce its prison population and manage low-level offenders through rehabilitation programs instead of incarceration. Has this reinvestment resulted in lower crime and recidivism rates?

    According to the Utah Department of Corrections, that landmark Justice Reinvestment Initiative aimed to “continue holding offenders accountable and securing our communities, but in a way that considers individual risks and treatment needs.”

    Are communities really safer when mental health and substance use needs are addressed through programs administered outside prison walls? The idea was to treat criminals differently based on their mental health needs and backgrounds. But at least one retired Adult Probation and Parole Officer, believes this “soft-on-crime” approach hasn’t resulted in safer streets.

    LOOKING BACK

    State Senator Todd Weiler, in that legislative role since 2012, helped drive the passage of the Justice Reinvestment Initiative (JRI), a massive bill that enjoyed broad-based approval among state officials and the Legislature as a whole.

    In November 2014, Weiler attended the national summit on the issue in San Diego, an event hosted by Pew Charitable Trusts. 

    “I was very involved in it. We had a lot of high hopes,” Weiler, a Woods Cross Republican, said in a recent interview. “That was about the time we were finalizing plans for the new prison. And we actually said that because of JRI we don’t need as many beds because we’ll be incarcerating fewer people. So that new prison was designed with this idea.”

    A key part of JRI dealt with adjusting sentencing for crimes related to addiction, dividing offenders into two basic groups: dangerous criminals who are a threat to society (that group goes to prison), and low-level offenders who get help kicking addictions through state-sponsored programs or private-sector rehabilitation.

    “The ultimate goal was if we have an otherwise good person who got caught up in an addiction, and as a result committed crimes, they need to be punished for their crimes,” Weiler said. “It’s not that we’re going to overlook what they did, but we wanted to focus primarily on helping them overcome their addiction and [that means] getting them back to their job and their family.” 

    Before JRI, low-level drug offenders with felonies would spend years in prison, which wreaked havoc with their lives and future prospects. Addressing the root cause of their theft and property crimes through supervision and treatment made sense. 

    “We’re all imperfect people,” Weiler said. “So we want people working their jobs, paying their bills and raising their kids rather than sitting in jail and watching TV or playing cards.”

    To access this post, you must purchase Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Salt Lake City Newcomers Club: Finding Friendship and Belonging Since 1948

    Moving away from your hometown can come with many blessings. But for some, it also comes with just as many bouts of loneliness. That ache of not knowing where to meet people, or grieving the friends you left behind, comes in waves. Workplaces and churches can sometimes provide ready-made communities, but what happens when they don’t? Where do you go to find true belonging?


  • How I Lost 120 Pounds and Changed My Relationship With Food

    Throughout most of my life, I used food to cope with chaos, depression, and pain I did not yet understand. By my early twenties, I weighed over 320 pounds and felt trapped in a body that limited every part of my life. This is the story of how learning about food, mental health, and habit-building helped me lose 120 pounds and rebuild stability.