HUMAN DIGNITY

The Broken Non-Profit System Behind Utah’s Homelessness Crisis

Can Utah’s proposed 30-acre homeless campus truly solve the state’s homelessness crisis, or is it another costly experiment doomed to fail? At a recent town hall, experts debated innovative solutions, but critics questioned whether their strategies address the root issues or merely perpetuate broken systems.

|


A town hall meeting discussing the new proposed Utah homeless campus was organized by Solutions Utah on November 20th at the Thomas S. Monson Building on North Temple. Watching the presentation were around one hundred attendees including elected government officials and staff, students, community council representatives, and staff of The Other Side Academy.

The thirty-acre homeless campus has been discussed for several years to better share the burden of Utah’s homeless crisis. The facility is touted to be “multi-tiered”, addressing myriad problems from which the homeless suffer. A site for the campus still has not been chosen. A facility called Haven for Hope in San Antonio offers something similar. It’s a “low-barrier” one-stop shop for all the problems suffered by the homeless. 

Two prominent businessmen and homeless advocates spoke on the state-wide plans, mostly about what is not working in homeless services, and how to improve the modality of those services. 

Randy Shumway, Chair of the Utah Homeless Services Board, and Joseph Grenny, acclaimed author and Founder of The Other Side Academy, each gave presentations at the townhall meeting. Shumway mostly spoke about the campus’ critical infrastructure of wrap-around services. Grenny spoke about how assets don’t solve human problems, but rather, how outcome-focused support and measurement is key. Measuring services provided is the norm in homeless services, while measuring outcomes is almost non-existent.

Randy Shumway is CEO of the Cicero Group. “We see article after article in the media that focuses on the facilities rather than the human crisis that actually is surrounding this population,” Shumway said,  emphasizing that a solution to the homeless crisis we find ourselves in cannot be solved by “bricks and mortar.”

Shumway added that the “guiding principles” that come to homeless treatment need to happen at the individual level, “to help them achieve human dignity.” Shumway drilled home the point that law and order cannot be sacrificed. 

The shelter resistant population who choose to camp outdoors rather than enter a shelter is not a condition we can tolerate. The audience burst into laughter when Shumway pointed out that, “Every time I pay my taxes, I’m ‘tax-payer resistant’, but that doesn’t mean I don’t still have to pay them.” 

Utah Stories has interviewed dozens of people who are “shelter resistant.” Currently, Tosha and her partner are camping by the Jordan River. They told Utah Stories it isn’t that they “resist the shelter,” but that they cannot handle the degree of violence and mental illness that exists in the Gerald E. King women’s shelter. 

Tosha is a “shelter resistant” woman who is camping beside the Jordan River.

The strongest aspect of the “homeless campus” facility is that unlike the shelters, it could segregate the “homeless community” between violent and non-violent, and mentally fit and mentally ill. The mentally ill homeless who commit physical violence against the other tenants and those residing on the streets is a major problem. Utah Stories has interviewed more than a dozen women who complain about the unsafe living conditions at the Gerald E. King shelter. 

Shumway then went into legislative priorities and what he wants to see Utah lawmakers tackle in the next session.

The Promise to “Solve Homelessness” through Housing has Failed for Years

After Shumway spoke, Founder of TOSA, Joseph Grenny, offered his presentation. Grenny showed a clip of California Governor Gavin Newsome from 2008. In the clip, Newsome explained his vision for serving the homeless population by building thousands upon thousands of housing units that could offer apartments for all of the homeless who were either unable or incapable of working. Since 2019, California has spent $24 billion on homelessness but the homeless population has exponentially grown.The result of this, more than a decade later, is that California’s homeless population continues to grow and the deterioration of neighborhoods in California has resulted in many people leaving the state. The Housing First model has failed in improving the situation for the homeless. 

California Governor Gavin Newsome said in 2008, “We are well on our way to solving chronic homelessness … We need to get out of the shelter business and get into the housing business.”

Another clip shows a woman who offered free housing for the homeless. This resulted in her building and the neighborhood quickly deteriorating, saying, “If this project helped just one person change their life, then it’s worth it.” But Grenny disagrees. “Housing expectations should not remain so low and dismal,” making the point that homelessness is never simply an “asset problem.” 

“The Non-Profit System is Broken because too few Non-Profits Die”

In our minds we come up with an implicit and cosmetic solution. Is it a housing problem? Is it a mental health problem? Is it a vocational skills problem?

“The non-profit system is broken,” says Grenny. It’s a structural problem. He points out that nonprofits are initially started by ideas, then we need donors and we need clients. Then the structural problem presents itself right away. “We have donors on the left and clients on the right and we need to figure out who we are going to serve. And guess which ones we defer to? We tend to [serve the donors]. As long as we serve up a series of stories that are tear-jerking and humane, as long as we can say, as long as we serve one person, we are humane. Look at a system or structure that tends to work. Markets tend to work because of the structure. You have a company that offers a product or service, and then you have a customer. And if customers don’t like it then they change or they die.”

Grenny continues, “Too few non-profits die. They should die. They should consolidate, they should. There ought to be immediate feedback, but it doesn’t happen that way, so here is how markets work. If you come out with a movie called Harry Potter, and if people watch it, they will provide more Harry Potter movies.” He then pointed out how Cats was a massive box-office flop, so nobody wanted to see Cats II or Cats III. Not so with non-profits.

Grenny reiterates how TOSA has succeeded to such a degree by measuring and focusing on outcomes. TOSA’s mission is to focus on a simple outcome; “drug-free, crime-free and employed.” Grenny added, “And we have statistics, even if they are embarrassing. We need to face those statistics. Most non-profits insult you with activity measures instead of outcome measures. The mission was getting out of poverty; there are 47,000 women we have served. Shame on us for writing checks for anyone writing checks like that.” 

Kensington, Philadelphia, just two miles from where the Declaration of Independence was signed.

A Human Problem Not an Asset Problem

“Our human services are failing due to bad framing. When we drive past this place in Kensington, you can frame it one way and ask, ‘Do they have an asset problem?’ A second class of problems we will call human problems,” Granny explains. 

When you try to solve a human problem by transferring an asset, you tend to make the human problem even worse. Grenny’s example is giving someone a car because they have totalled their own car. That might seem to solve the person’s immediate needs and help them, but if the reason they totaled their car was due to a DUI, and you just enabled the person to keep drinking and getting behind the wheel, then the underlying problem hasn’t been solved, only worsened. What we have got to create are solutions that encircle individuals that help them improve. That helps them achieve the human dignity that is in each of them.

State Homeless Coordinator Wayne Niederhauser was in attendance, and we sought his comments on the plans, especially regarding our ongoing coverage of the death rate at the Road Home operated Magnolia Apartments. He only asked us if we had visited since the “New wrap-around mental health services were put in place.” 

As of two months ago, the Magnolia is still a den of sex trafficking and drug activity — free apartments for the chronically homeless, many of whom use drugs on a daily basis, and is not being addressed.

What Does Utah’s State Homeless Coordinator Have to Say?

Utah Stories has attempted for the past two weeks to get a few questions answered by the State Homeless Coordinator Wayne Niederhauser. 
We would like to ask a few questions regarding the homeless campus, possible sites being considered.  Further, we would like to find out what measures his office has taken to fulfill Utah Governor Spencer Cox’s mandate in the spring of 2024, to hold the institutions providing homeless services more accountable for the taxpayer dollars that are provided to them. Niederhauser doesn’t wish to speak to Utah Stories nor answer the question regarding institutional accountability, Instead we were referred to the DWS website for his office.

,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Left in a Box as a Baby: Trauma, Alcoholism, and Addiction

    A man abandoned as a baby builds a structured life in law enforcement, but unresolved trauma and alcoholism slowly begin to unravel it. His story raises a harder question about how change actually happens.


  • Utah Official’s $36K Travel Reimbursements Raise Questions About Use of Taxpayer Funds

    The trek into the office is a necessary evil for many employees; unpaid time that could be spent elsewhere. But some state employees are able to cash in on their commutes.

    That includes one member of Gov. Spencer Cox’s cabinet who heads the Utah Department of Cultural & Community Engagement. The department oversees a number of civic and social programs ranging from museums, libraries and the state historical society, to volunteerism efforts and multicultural affairs. 

    The employee’s in-state travel expenses made up a large chunk of the department’s employee reimbursements in recent years, according to documents obtained by The Utah Investigative Journalism Project obtained through a public records request. 

    The UIJP reviewed spreadsheets detailing the reimbursed expenses of the department’s 17-person leadership team over the 2024 and 2025 fiscal years. 

    The analysis showed one employee, Executive Director Donna Law, accounted for nearly a third of the team’s reimbursements in 2024 and 43% in 2025. Law, who lives in Cedar City, spent more than 11 times the average amount spent by all other employees included in the analysis. 

    The majority of Law’s expenses were categorized as in-state travel, which includes mileage and lodging. Between the two years, she spent $21,607.94 on lodging, $10,135.42  on auto mileage, and $1,455.00 in miscellaneous travel expenses and meals for a total of over $33,000. 

    The next highest amount spent on in-state travel was $3,385. Law’s overall spending far exceeded any other employee.

    The nearly $36,000 Law spent on travel and other items wasnearly three times that spent by the employee with the second highest amount in reimbursements. His expenses, in contrast, were largely out-of-state travel.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • The $7 Million Recruit: How NIL Changed College Athletics Forever

    In 2012, Jabari Parker, a top high school prospect and member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was facing his biggest decision to that point in his life: where to play college basketball. 

    Fans of BYU athletics hoped and perhaps prayed that Parker would pick the school owned by the church he was raised in. BYU was listed as one of his final choices. But he ultimately chose to spend his college years at Duke before attempting a career in the NBA. BYU fans were disappointed, but no one was truly surprised. Duke over BYU was the best choice for a young prospect in 2012. 

    A.J. Dybantsa.

    What changed between 2012 and 2024 when A.J. Dybantsa, the number one high school prospect, chose BYU over every other school? The answer is roughly $7 million dollars. That is what Dybantsa is reportedly making to play basketball at BYU. 

    The deal was supported by Utah Jazz owner Ryan Smith, who met multiple times with the Dybantsa family in multiple attempts to bring the young player to Provo. 

    According to Smith, he had no financial role in bringing Dybantsa to BYU, but the influence of Utah’s most famous billionaire acting as a “booster” or unofficial recruiter certainly swayed the decision.

    Prior to 2021, boosters acting as recruiters was taboo to the NCAA governing body. It was called improper recruiting. But in 2021, California began the modern era of NIL, or the ability of a college athlete to benefit from their name, image, or likeness, when they passed the “Fair Pay to Play Act.” 

    This new law gave college athletes in California the ability to benefit from their NIL, something that was banned in the rest of the country to that point. The NCAA saw that this law would create an unfair advantage for California schools that could now give young athletes the chance to make money off their talent and image while still in college. 

    The NCAA knew they needed to do something quickly, so they rushed through a policy that opened up NIL to all college athletes in the country, and it has been expanding and evolving over the last four years. 

    Grant Duff, who has coached at the University of Utah, Weber State University, and is now the defensive coordinator for Idaho State University, says, “The best part of NIL is that athletes have an opportunity to make good money. The downside comes with the free-for-all that money causes.”

    Dybantsa confers with BYU Head coach, Kevin Young.

    One of the biggest current examples of what a school can do when the boosters are willing to pay for success is Texas Tech University. From 2020-2024, Texas Tech had 34 wins, which works out to 6.8 wins per year with a low of 4 wins and high of 8. Then Texas Tech’s boosters got involved, led by Cody Campbell, an oil industry businessman and Chairman of the Texas Tech board. The football program was given 28 million dollars for NIL with a simple message attached to the large pile of money: Win. And win now. And win they did. 

    By signing NIL deals with athletes in the transfer portal, Texas Tech went from a middle-of-the-pack school in their conference to one of the top 12 teams in the country. They didn’t just win games in 2025, they made many of their opponents look like they didn’t belong on the same field, including the University of Utah and BYU twice. That is what money can buy.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Cottonwood Heights Corruption Allegations: A Case That Never Reached a Courtroom

    A year ago, we here at Utah Stories recorded a podcast episode that we never published. We were revisiting corruption allegations from ten years ago. We decided not to publish the video, so it sat there on YouTube for nearly 12 months.

    Then somehow the video was published. How? We are not sure, but once it got out there, the comments came pouring in.

    Dozens of viewers, then hundreds, supported the video with their comments on our examination of allegations of police misconduct in Cottonwood Heights. The video recounts how the Police Department was reported by business owners as focusing enforcement on customers of the former Canyon Inn bar. These allegations did not result in a publicly documented, full investigation by Utah’s Justice Department nor the FBI (at least to our knowledge). So why rehash the past?

    We believe the story of The Canyon Inn (and other area business owners) vs. CHPD and Cottonwood Heights Mayor Kelvin Cullimore raises questions about what can happen when allegations surface and do not move forward through a formal legal process with state or federal oversight.

    In 2012, Cottonwood Heights business owners at the mouth of the canyons began publicly objecting to police activity whereby up to seven cruisers were pulling over 711 and Canyon Inn bar customers on their busiest evenings.

    According to those accounts, drivers leaving the bar were frequently pulled over by police and were given DUI tickets, sometimes even after passing a sobriety examination. The volume and concentration of those stops led residents and business owners to complain about the “heavy-handed treatment” of CHPD toward motorists, especially in and around the Canyon Inn and neighboring 711, and eventually the Porcupine Pub.

    Customers responded in predictable ways. Some chose not to return and avoid the area. Others went to different establishments. Over time, the owner of the Canyon Inn, Jim Stojack, stated that his revenue declined by 70% and that he believed police activity near his business was the main contributing factor.

    Utah Stories reported on these concerns by conducting interviews; gathering video documentation provided by those involved; and making public records requests. Through our GRAMA requests, we reviewed DUI citations issued by the Cottonwood Heights Police Department and examined how those cases were resolved in Holladay Justice Court. During that period, we observed a higher number based on our review of DUI cases dismissed in court due to lack of evidence compared to other jurisdictions. One DUI attorney, Tyler Ayers, went on record saying that CHPD was issuing a high volume of DUI citations that were later dismissed.

    That observation raised questions about how cases were being documented and prosecuted. It did not, on its own, establish intent or misconduct, but it became part of a broader set of concerns raised by multiple sources.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).