Environment

Not All Lightshows Are Safe. The Radiation Exposure Compensation Act Benefits Utah’s Downwinders

Utah’s downwinders are finally getting the help they deserve through the extension of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act.

|


Utah’s downwinders are finally getting the help they deserve. 

This past June, Congress extended the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, a decades-old program that offers payments to people who have suffered health effects as a result of working in the uranium industry, and to “downwinders,” people who have been harmed by the fallout from nuclear weapons testing. 

In the early days of the atomic era, radiation was not widely understood. Even while the United States was developing the deadliest weapons ever made, the public wasn’t aware that the aftermath of the explosions could cause many forms of cancer many years after exposure.

The United States conducted its first nuclear weapons test in New Mexico in 1945. According to a website for the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center, the blast vaporized the 100-foot tower that held the plutonium bomb and turned surrounding sand and asphalt into green glass. Observers were knocked to the ground. The explosion was visible as far as 200 miles away.

A few weeks later, the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan, demolishing the city, then another bomb was dropped on the Japanese City of Nagasaki a few days later, again causing devastation. Those two World War II attacks are the only times nuclear weapons have been used in warfare.

The U.S. continued testing atomic weapons above ground into the 1960s, mostly at a location known as the Nevada Test Site, about 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas. (Nuclear weapons testing below ground continued into the 1990s). Fallout from these tests blew across the West, showering communities with radioactive material. In particular, a radionuclide called iodine-131 was spread across vast areas, contaminating feed for cows. Iodine-131 became concentrated in the cows’ milk, and consumers of the milk received large doses of the dangerous substance. High rates of cancer and other health issues still persist in areas affected by the tests. 

As the negative health effects of this fallout became broadly known, industry workers and downwind communities accused the federal government of failing to disclose the damage that radiation could do. In fact, in the early 1950s, the Atomic Energy Commission issued flyers assuring the public that the tests posed no danger, though government scientists were aware of the threats.

RECA was established in 1990. It offers compensation in a lump sum to eligible people — or their heirs, if the person is deceased — diagnosed with specific types of cancer or illnesses. For uranium miners, millers and ore transporters, the amount is $100,000; for on-site participants in nuclear weapons testing, the amount is $75,000; for downwinders of the Nevada Test Site, the compensation is $50,000.

According to the University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, RECA considers 19 types of primary cancer to be potentially related to radioactive fallout, including brain cancer, breast cancer, leukemia and thyroid cancer. Residents in over 20 counties in Arizona, Nevada and Utah are eligible for RECA benefits. The ten Utah counties included in the act are Beaver, Garfield, Iron, Kane, Millard, Piute, San Juan, Sevier, Washington, and Wayne.

The University of Utah’s J. Willard Marriott Library maintains a collection called the Downwinders of Utah Archive, with oral history interviews, written personal histories and other materials documenting the experiences of Utah downwinders.

Multiple interview subjects recalled going outside to watch the tests: standing on hillsides with parents or teachers, waiting for the flash and listening for the boom minutes later. Then they’d watch the resulting clouds drift over their towns, lighting up sunsets with spectacular colors and raining radioactive particles over their homes. Many of the interviewees say as years went by, they lost family members, friends and classmates to cancer, and many are cancer survivors themselves. 

“We were told that it was harmless, more or less,” said Lester Gary Cottam, one of the subjects in the Downwinders of Utah Archives. “Come to find out, we were being used like guinea pigs … I think, overall, nuclear weapons are probably the biggest disaster we’ve got on this planet.” 

RECA was scheduled to expire in July of 2022 but the extension adds two more years. Supporters of the program propose to use those two years to amend the act by expanding the geographic area included, covering more illnesses linked to radiation, extending eligibility to more members of the uranium mining industry — and then extending the amended program further into the future. Some have also proposed adjusting the compensation amounts to account for inflation.

Utah Senator Mike Lee sponsored the bill to extend RECA in the Senate.

“Downwinders, uranium miners, uranium millers, and ore transporters were harmed by the federal government and deserve compensation,” Lee said in a press release about the extension.

Officials from Arizona, New Mexico, and the Navajo Nation also support the extension and expansion of RECA. In a discussion of the extension in the U.S. House of Representatives, Arizona Representative Greg Stanton said that RECA has so far made payments to over 37,000 people.

“We know an extension of RECA is necessary,” Stanton said. “There are still families filing claims for their fair share of restitution, and according to a recent publication of the CDC, many more individuals will develop cancers and illnesses linked to the radiation exposure in the years to come.”

In the same session, New Mexico Representative Teresa Leger Fernandez read from an article from the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine that argued that many people would continue to develop diseases from their involvement in the uranium industry beyond the cutoff in the current iteration of RECA. As it stands, the law only covers people employed between 1942 and 1971.

Navajo Nation President Jonathan Nez said in a press release that now that the extension has passed, “we can continue to work for the reauthorization and expansion of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act through 2040.”

Reauthorization of RECA has bipartisan support, and the federal government’s responsibility for the illnesses of uranium workers and downwinders is being acknowledged. But the many troubling implications of nuclear weapons persist.

RELATED CONTENT

Moab, Utah: Uranium Boom Led to One of the Most Vibrant Towns in Utah

How Moab, Utah Moved from Mining to Recreation

San Rafael Secrets: What Did Madame Marie Curie Do in the Middle of a Utah Desert?

Revisiting Utah’s Mining Past

Moab’s Old Uranium Roads – Perfect Mountain Biking Trails

SUPPORT LOCAL JOURNALISM AND SUBSCRIBE TO PRINT MAGAZINE

Subscribe to Utah Stories weekly newsletter and get our stories directly to your inbox

* indicates required



,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Inside Moab’s Political Divide: Land, Tourism, and the Future of Grand County, Utah

    In the late 1950s, Edward Abbey took a job as a park ranger at Arches National Monument, just outside Moab. What he found there, and what he watched happen to it, would shape the rest of his life. Roads were being cut into the canyon country. Cars were replacing foot traffic. The National Park Service, in the name of accessibility, was engineering a kind of industrialization of the wilderness he’d come to love. Abbey wrote about it in Desert Solitaire, published in 1968, and the anger in that book wasn’t abstract. It came from watching something specific be changed by people who either didn’t understand what they had or didn’t care.

    Grand County has long been the most reliably left-leaning county in the state, a fact that puts it in sharp contrast to nearly everything around it. To understand how that happened, and where things stand now, I spoke with longtime residents and politicians who’ve watched it from the inside, people who’ve served in local government and lived through the shifts firsthand.

    Robert Greenberg.

    Bob Greenberg came from New York in 1976, took a job at the community mental health center, and never left. He went on to chair the Grand County Democratic Party and serve on the county council. When he arrived, he said, “the Democratic Party was said to be able to meet in a phone booth” — and even then, its members were a contradictory bunch. Yellow Dog Democrats from the oil patch were fiscally conservative but surprisingly open socially, allowing different demographics to feel safe moving to the county. 

    “The town fathers were desperate to have new people come to town,” Greenberg recalls. “They just didn’t want the people who actually showed up. They wanted some other people.”

    What followed was a demographic shift nobody planned. The people who filled the gap left by the bust were river guides, federal agency workers, artists, and eventually waves of outdoor recreationists discovering that southeastern Utah was among the most spectacular landscapes on earth. Tourism ended up being the only economic development avenue that actually worked. Manufacturing never had the labor force or market access, sewing factories came and went. The people the tourist economy attracted tended to be younger, more outdoor-oriented, and more liberal.

    Kevin Walker.

    Kevin Walker, a former Grand County commissioner who moved here in 1990 for the landscape, puts the county’s diversity in context. “Moab [is] a pretty diverse place since, I think, at least the 1950s with the uranium mining boom,” he says. “So it’s not a typical Southern Utah town.” 

    Part of what makes Grand County distinct is self-reinforcing. Federal agencies like the Park Service, the Forest Service, the BLM, have large presences here and pull in a different demographic than surrounding counties. People looking to live in Southern Utah with certain values gravitate toward the place where those values already have a foothold. Over time, that critical mass has made Grand County what it is politically, while neighboring counties went in very different directions.

    The defining conflict in Grand County has always been over land.

    In the 1970s and 80s, it was extraction versus preservation in the starkest terms. County commissioners floated toxic waste incinerators. A plan emerged to site a high-level nuclear waste repository at the entrance to Canyonlands National Park. 

    “It really, really galvanized environmentalists everywhere, but particularly in Grand County,” Greenberg says. Activists put up signs at the park entrance, watched them get chainsawed down, and came back with steel reinforcement. That stubborn, physical, unglamorous persistence became part of the local political character.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • The Stratos Project Was Already Approved. So Why the Public Meeting?

    Thousands showed up to protest. The decision may have already been made.

    When thousands of Box Elder County residents packed the fairgrounds to protest the proposed 40,000-acre Stratos data center, they thought they were confronting the people in charge.

    They weren’t.

    The county commissioners stood at the front of the room, absorbing the anger, the frustration, the disbelief. They looked like decision-makers. But by their own account, they weren’t.

    Because the decision may have already been made—long before the public ever showed up.

    The Illusion of Authority

    What happened at that meeting wasn’t civic engagement. It was something closer to theater.

    No meaningful public comment. No real debate. No clear path for residents to influence the outcome. Just a room full of people reacting to a project that, structurally, may already be locked in.

    Why?

    Because the real authority doesn’t sit with Box Elder County.

    It sits with the Utah Military Installation Development Authority.

    Once MIDA designates a project area, the rules change. Local zoning can become irrelevant. Private land stays private. Water rights remain private. And the role of local government shifts from decision-maker to facilitator.

    In plain terms: the county doesn’t decide if the project happens. It helps manage how it happens.

    So when residents showed up demanding answers, they were asking the wrong people.

    A Process That Skips the Public

    That should concern anyone paying attention.

    Because it flips the normal order of things. Instead of:

    Proposal → Public input → Decision

    We get:

    Decision → Public meeting → Reaction

    And by the time the public enters the room, the real levers of power have already been pulled.

    So what exactly was that meeting?

    If commissioners don’t have authority to stop the project, then the meeting wasn’t about deciding anything. It was about absorbing pressure. Managing optics. Creating the appearance of a process that had already moved on.

    That’s not transparency. That’s choreography.

    Follow the Missing Pieces


  • Moab Trail Closures: The Fight Over Public Land Access and Off-Roading

    Trail closures threaten livelihoods and slowly limit access to ordinary families, says Dave Hellman, owner of Xtreme 4×4 Tours in Moab. Wilderness advocates argue that stronger protections are necessary to preserve fragile landscapes. As lawsuits reshape trail access across southern Utah, Moab increasingly sits at the center of a growing conflict over who public lands are really for.


  • Nine Mile Ranch: Preserving Utah’s Historic Nine Mile Canyon

    Nine Mile Canyon is famous worldwide for its Fremont and Ute rock art panels, some of which are pecked ‘petroglyphs,’ while others are painted ‘pictographs.’ The canyon, home to the Fremont people and a seasonal pass-through for the Utes, preserves prehistoric pit houses, rock shelters and granaries. It’s the most concentrated rock art spot in North America.