Community Relations

The Reality of Van Life in Moab, Utah

Maintaining daily routines while living in a van is hard, and there aren’t other viable housing options for Moab’s seasonal workers.

|


Cindy Martinez has been coming to Moab during the summers to work since 2016. She’s nearing 65, and her husband is 70. Both collect disability, and both live out of their van.

“There are good things and bad things that happen in Moab,” Martinez said. The wages in Moab are high, but the cost of living is higher. Maintaining daily routines while living out of a vehicle is hard, and there aren’t other viable housing options for people in her situation, she said. She likes the climate in Moab, but she feels her worth as an employee is undervalued.

Martinez has worked for hotels and RV parks in Moab, cleaning rooms and cabins, doing laundry and helping with guest services. Though Moab businesses pay well, she has had fall-outs with a few employers. She’s been denied promised sign-on bonuses and given only part-time hours after being hired for a full-time position. Employees feeling expendable, combined with an impossible housing market, makes it hard for businesses to recruit and keep adequate staffing, Martinez said.

“You can still look on the job sites,” she said of Moab businesses. “They’re dying for workers.” Social media posts and help wanted signs around town indicate that many Moab businesses do need extra help.

Moab is booming with tourists and prices. Making it unaffordable for some local residents.

Community leaders are acutely aware of the housing problem in Moab. There are some subsidized affordable housing options: the nonprofit Housing Authority of Southeastern Utah manages three apartment complexes and several other programs to help low- and middle-income earners obtain housing. However, there are usually long wait lists for all of those programs, and all of them require applicants to meet certain criteria to be eligible. Martinez said that when she’s working, her income, combined with her and her husband’s disability payments, can push them above the qualifying threshold for some subsidized programs — but it’s not nearly enough to pay for market-rate housing.

The Moab Area Community Land Trust, a local nonprofit organization, is working on developing a subdivision that will include hundreds of units for low- and middle-income brackets. Moab City has purchased a lot with the intention of building an affordable housing development.

In 2019, Grand County approved a zoning overlay that allows developers to build with increased density in exchange for designating some of their units as workforce housing for people who live and work in Grand County. Projects like these take a long time to get off the ground. In the meantime, some Moab workers still rely on their vehicles.

The City of Moab has considered a temporary ordinance allowing RVs to be parked on private property outside of campgrounds to provide some immediate relief for houseless workers.

Technically, it’s illegal to “camp” out of a vehicle in Grand County unless you’re parked in a designated campground or on federal public lands in areas where dispersed camping is allowed. The City of Moab has had such an ordinance for years. In January of this year, the Grand County Commission passed an ordinance clarifying those rules for county lands as well.

The county attorney told commissioners that sheriff’s deputies needed clearer language to be able to effectively address complaints about nuisance campers and people illegally renting out their yards or driveways. So far, citations have not been issued.

Those circumstances mean it’s hard for people living in vehicles to find somewhere to park for the night, Martinez said. She and her husband have been woken up by police officers in the early hours of the morning while sleeping in their van on the street or in parking lots in town.

Even a tent site with no electrical hookups or sewer at a private campground in town costs around $30 a night. Martinez said one campground quoted her $700 as a monthly rate for a tent site. But driving out of town to free camping on federal land has costs as well.

“When you’ve got to rely on your car to get out of town … you have to worry about how reliable your car is and how much money you have for gas,” Martinez said. In addition to fuel for the van, other expenses come with living in a vehicle: vehicle maintenance costs, propane for cooking, ice, laundromat use, and a gym membership to be able to use the shower. 

Sometimes cooking is too much of a hassle, with having to set up a camp stove in inclement weather or in crowded picnic areas after an exhausting day of work. At those times, Martinez said, she and her husband eat out, which is another expense.

Martinez and her husband have left Moab for a milder climate for the winter, but she says she’ll be back in Moab next summer if she can find work. She hopes to save up enough money to buy a better vehicle, maybe even an RV, to make life easier.

MORE MOAB STORIES

Living Without Cars in Moab, Utah

Flying for the First Time over Some of the Most Spectacular Scenery on Earth, Moab Utah

Exploring Ghost Towns Royal & Cisco near Moab, Utah

John W. Williams: Moab’s Wild West Doctor

Moab Utah: The Man Who Quit Money

AND MORE…

Subscribe to Utah Stories weekly newsletter and get our stories directly to your inbox

* indicates required




<!–End mc_e

, ,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Moab’s Off-Road Legend Dan Mick: Inside Hell’s Revenge and the Fight for Public Land Access

    The story of Moab’s off-road world isn’t just about machines. It’s about the people who have shaped this place — people like Dan Mick, who has spent a lifetime climbing impossible angles and helping others experience the wonder of the slickrock and the trails.


  • A Ski Village or a Tipping Point? Nordic Valley Expansion Divides Ogden Valley

    The project, known as Nordic Village, is expected to roll out over the next decade and represents one of the largest tourism developments in the valley’s history.


  • Utah Homelessness Crisis: Tyler Clancy Challenges ‘Housing First’ Failures

    “It’s not normal to see someone sleeping on the sidewalk in a sleeping bag with a needle sticking out of their arm.”

    That sentence should not be controversial. In a sane society, it would barely need saying. But in Utah — where politicians, nonprofits, consultants, and bureaucrats have spent more than a decade congratulating themselves for “addressing homelessness” while the streets of Salt Lake have become more dangerous, more drug-soaked, and more morally disorienting — it lands like an indictment. And it came not from a crank, a talk-radio host, or a downtown business owner at the end of his rope, but from Tyler Clancy, Utah’s newly appointed homeless coordinator.

    That matters because if Clancy is serious — and after sitting down with him, he appears to be — then he represents something Utah’s homelessness system has not had in a very long time: someone willing to say the obvious out loud. The old script is dead. Everybody knows it, but almost nobody in power has wanted to admit it. 

    For years, Utah’s homelessness policy has been built on a polite fiction — that if we build enough units, distribute enough funding, and avoid being too “judgmental,” the crisis will gradually resolve itself. That story was easier to maintain when Utah was receiving national praise for “solving chronic homelessness.” It is much harder to sustain now, when the conditions on the ground tell a very different story.

    Magnolia Apartments opened to help alleviate homelessness, but the results were not all positive.

    Part of that failure became painfully clear over the last four years. By most accounts, former homelessness coordinator Wayne Niederhauser was a decent man and a very nice guy. But one person close to him described his tenure as that of “a tiger without stripes”— someone with the title, but not the appetite to challenge the sprawling network of nonprofits and service providers receiving millions in taxpayer dollars. That lack of accountability has had real consequences. Multiple former and current residents have told Utah Stories that of the roughly 60 original tenants who moved into Magnolia when it opened, about 20 have since died — most, they say, from accidental drug overdoses. 

    If those accounts are even close to accurate, they should have triggered a public reckoning. Instead, the system kept moving, protected by good intentions, insulated from scrutiny, and largely unbothered by outcomes that would be considered a scandal in almost any other context.

    That is the machine Clancy is stepping into, and unless he is willing to confront it directly — not just coordinate around it — his role risks becoming one more layer of management over the same failures. The reality he inherits is not complicated in the way policymakers like to suggest. It is visible, immediate, and increasingly impossible to explain away. 

    Open drug use, fentanyl addiction, untreated mental illness, rising disorder, and a growing sense among both the public and the homeless themselves all indicate that the system is not working. Complexity exists, but it has also become a convenient shield for cowardice. It is the language people use when they want to avoid saying what is plainly in front of them: Utah has spent years managing visible human collapse while calling it compassion.

    The Lie Utah Told Itself

    For years, Utah’s approach to homelessness rested on a narrative few in power were willing to question. It sounded compassionate. It polled well. And it avoided uncomfortable truths.

    Continue reading with a Utah Stories subscription. Start your 3-month free trial.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Inside Moab’s Political Divide: Land, Tourism, and the Future of Grand County, Utah

    In the late 1950s, Edward Abbey took a job as a park ranger at Arches National Monument, just outside Moab. What he found there, and what he watched happen to it, would shape the rest of his life. Roads were being cut into the canyon country. Cars were replacing foot traffic. The National Park Service, in the name of accessibility, was engineering a kind of industrialization of the wilderness he’d come to love. Abbey wrote about it in Desert Solitaire, published in 1968, and the anger in that book wasn’t abstract. It came from watching something specific be changed by people who either didn’t understand what they had or didn’t care.

    Grand County has long been the most reliably left-leaning county in the state, a fact that puts it in sharp contrast to nearly everything around it. To understand how that happened, and where things stand now, I spoke with longtime residents and politicians who’ve watched it from the inside, people who’ve served in local government and lived through the shifts firsthand.

    Robert Greenberg.

    Bob Greenberg came from New York in 1976, took a job at the community mental health center, and never left. He went on to chair the Grand County Democratic Party and serve on the county council. When he arrived, he said, “the Democratic Party was said to be able to meet in a phone booth” — and even then, its members were a contradictory bunch. Yellow Dog Democrats from the oil patch were fiscally conservative but surprisingly open socially, allowing different demographics to feel safe moving to the county. 

    “The town fathers were desperate to have new people come to town,” Greenberg recalls. “They just didn’t want the people who actually showed up. They wanted some other people.”

    What followed was a demographic shift nobody planned. The people who filled the gap left by the bust were river guides, federal agency workers, artists, and eventually waves of outdoor recreationists discovering that southeastern Utah was among the most spectacular landscapes on earth. Tourism ended up being the only economic development avenue that actually worked. Manufacturing never had the labor force or market access, sewing factories came and went. The people the tourist economy attracted tended to be younger, more outdoor-oriented, and more liberal.

    Kevin Walker.

    Kevin Walker, a former Grand County commissioner who moved here in 1990 for the landscape, puts the county’s diversity in context. “Moab [is] a pretty diverse place since, I think, at least the 1950s with the uranium mining boom,” he says. “So it’s not a typical Southern Utah town.” 

    Part of what makes Grand County distinct is self-reinforcing. Federal agencies like the Park Service, the Forest Service, the BLM, have large presences here and pull in a different demographic than surrounding counties. People looking to live in Southern Utah with certain values gravitate toward the place where those values already have a foothold. Over time, that critical mass has made Grand County what it is politically, while neighboring counties went in very different directions.

    The defining conflict in Grand County has always been over land.

    In the 1970s and 80s, it was extraction versus preservation in the starkest terms. County commissioners floated toxic waste incinerators. A plan emerged to site a high-level nuclear waste repository at the entrance to Canyonlands National Park. 

    “It really, really galvanized environmentalists everywhere, but particularly in Grand County,” Greenberg says. Activists put up signs at the park entrance, watched them get chainsawed down, and came back with steel reinforcement. That stubborn, physical, unglamorous persistence became part of the local political character.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).