Utah Stories

How Main Street is Being Traded for Wall Street

Local businesses recirculate dollars into the local economy seven times more than a Wall Street corporation.

|


Downtown Salt Lake City ca. 1955

Ask anybody how they define their community and they will inevitably mention the local businesses: the local grocery store; the shoe repair shop; the hardware store; the watch repair shop, and of course restaurants, bars, and the local farmers markets. It’s cliche, but it’s true: locally-owned businesses are the backbone of communities and Main Street.

In the past two decades locally-owned shops have been increasingly undermined by complicated tax policy; overly burdensome regulations; and increasing tax burdens from local, state, and federal entities. As a result of the increasing complication and difficulty in starting a small business, while more small businesses are starting up than ever before, our overall economic picture is showing that Wall Street is gaining a greater share of the overall economic spending power of Americans: Main Street is being traded for Wall Street. This ultimately results in the rich getting richer and local economies becoming increasingly less independent and more reliant on Wall Street corporations, banks, and investment for both jobs and tax revenue. 

One problem often overlooked is how our so-called “free market” isn’t exactly free. Local businesses rarely are ever asking the government for hand-outs. Why should they? They want their revenue to come from sales and serving their customers. But there is a massive unfair advantage given to Wall Street corporations in the form of tax abatements and subsidies that our cities provide to entice the corporate behemoths to build and do business in our cities. Along the Wasatch Front alone millions of dollars have been doled out to mega-corporations to set up shop, even if they are a direct threat to local business operations and revenue.

These subsidies are designed to favor Wall Street retail, tech, and restaurants over the local businesses. Amazon was given over $5 million by the state of Utah to open its first major facility near the Salt Lake City International Airport. Then they were given another $1 million to cover infrastructure costs at their South Jordan facility (the Utah Investigative Journalism Project learned for Utah Stories).

Have you not heard of any of these incentives? They receive scant media attention, because both the legislators passing the laws as well as the corporate lobbyist partners, don’t want you to know about them. But Amazon isn’t alone.

WATCH THE VIDEO

According to Good Jobs First, an organization that tracks government subsidies to large corporations, Walmart stores receive on average $7.4 million in local and state tax subsidies per store. And as of 2004 Walmart stores had received a staggering $1.08 billion in subsidies from 244 stores. 

When was the last time your local bookseller or hardware shop boasted about getting any tax subsidy from the local government? Despite our love for our local shops, tax subsidies or breaks for locally-owned businesses rarely occur. This is because local businesses can’t promise fancy lunches by lobbyists or contributions to political campaigns, nor millions in eventual sales tax revenue to city coffers.

The same Good Jobs First study also contends that these subsidies are not going to attract high-paying jobs, or to entice a new innovation in the marketplace. Instead, Walmart and Amazon often put local shops such as hobby stores, toy stores, hardware, and sporting goods stores out of business. This drives down commercial real estate producing blighted empty retail areas. The big-box blight, offering millions of unused square feet of retail space has remained empty for years.

The Spirit Halloween Stores Flourish Due to Bad Economic Policy

Examining last Halloween, there were seven Spirit Halloween stores along the Wasatch Front in empty or unused big box stores. These seven locations were formerly supermarkets, K-Marts, Sears, and hobby and sporting goods stores. The big-box boneyards are partially the result of our economic leaders assisting Walmart and Amazon in putting former competitors out of business.

But some might argue that Walmarts in communities improve the lives of residents by offering cheap products that stretch our limited family budgets. This is a valid argument, and big-box stores are excellent at selling their stores to local communities based on not only the “value-added” but the promise of big tax benefits to municipalities in the form of collecting retail sales tax. 

But in reality, according to the same report, Walmart often destroys as many jobs as it creates. They don’t mention this when they are convincing our political leaders into giving them millions of dollars of tax breaks. Local, small retailers offer huge benefits that are often overlooked by city economic leaders.

The Economic Benefits of Local Business

An excellent local retailer knows their suppliers and they know their customers, who are both often more local or regional, boosting these areas’ economies (rather than the economy of China, where so many of Walmart and Amazon products are manufactured). They communicate to suppliers and manufacturers how they can improve products based on consumer feedback and demand. Owner-operated stores often hire out all major services to other local providers which improves the overall local economic output of service providers. 

Studies prove that local businesses recirculate dollars into the local economy seven times more than a Wall Street corporation. This means the money that remains local and is recirculated can be taxed many more times by local governments. Money spent at Walmart immediately exits our economy, and cannot be taxed. Further, if these stores’ taxes are reduced, this is not an overall benefit for communities but a burden.

Our politicians need to begin to recognize how much our communities benefit from excellent locally-owned businesses. Part of Utah Stories’ mission is to demonstrate to our political leaders the benefit of supporting Main Street businesses over Wall Street Corporations. Our sense of place, our sense of community value; even our property values all benefit when there is an abundance and variety of local shops near our homes.

Let’s buy local this holiday season, and maintain our ownership over our towns and cities.

MORE STORIES:

How Salt Lake City’s Main Street Was Traded for Wall Street, Pt. 1

How Salt Lake City’s Main Street Was Traded for Wall Street, Pt. 2

WATCH THE VIDEO

Subscribe to Utah Stories weekly newsletter and get our stories directly to your inbox

* indicates required



, , ,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Utah Homelessness Crisis: Tyler Clancy Challenges ‘Housing First’ Failures

    “It’s not normal to see someone sleeping on the sidewalk in a sleeping bag with a needle sticking out of their arm.”

    That sentence should not be controversial. In a sane society, it would barely need saying. But in Utah — where politicians, nonprofits, consultants, and bureaucrats have spent more than a decade congratulating themselves for “addressing homelessness” while the streets of Salt Lake have become more dangerous, more drug-soaked, and more morally disorienting — it lands like an indictment. And it came not from a crank, a talk-radio host, or a downtown business owner at the end of his rope, but from Tyler Clancy, Utah’s newly appointed homeless coordinator.

    That matters because if Clancy is serious — and after sitting down with him, he appears to be — then he represents something Utah’s homelessness system has not had in a very long time: someone willing to say the obvious out loud. The old script is dead. Everybody knows it, but almost nobody in power has wanted to admit it. 

    For years, Utah’s homelessness policy has been built on a polite fiction — that if we build enough units, distribute enough funding, and avoid being too “judgmental,” the crisis will gradually resolve itself. That story was easier to maintain when Utah was receiving national praise for “solving chronic homelessness.” It is much harder to sustain now, when the conditions on the ground tell a very different story.

    Magnolia Apartments opened to help alleviate homelessness, but the results were not all positive.

    Part of that failure became painfully clear over the last four years. By most accounts, former homelessness coordinator Wayne Niederhauser was a decent man and a very nice guy. But one person close to him described his tenure as that of “a tiger without stripes”— someone with the title, but not the appetite to challenge the sprawling network of nonprofits and service providers receiving millions in taxpayer dollars. That lack of accountability has had real consequences. Multiple former and current residents have told Utah Stories that of the roughly 60 original tenants who moved into Magnolia when it opened, about 20 have since died — most, they say, from accidental drug overdoses. 

    If those accounts are even close to accurate, they should have triggered a public reckoning. Instead, the system kept moving, protected by good intentions, insulated from scrutiny, and largely unbothered by outcomes that would be considered a scandal in almost any other context.

    That is the machine Clancy is stepping into, and unless he is willing to confront it directly — not just coordinate around it — his role risks becoming one more layer of management over the same failures. The reality he inherits is not complicated in the way policymakers like to suggest. It is visible, immediate, and increasingly impossible to explain away. 

    Open drug use, fentanyl addiction, untreated mental illness, rising disorder, and a growing sense among both the public and the homeless themselves all indicate that the system is not working. Complexity exists, but it has also become a convenient shield for cowardice. It is the language people use when they want to avoid saying what is plainly in front of them: Utah has spent years managing visible human collapse while calling it compassion.

    The Lie Utah Told Itself

    For years, Utah’s approach to homelessness rested on a narrative few in power were willing to question. It sounded compassionate. It polled well. And it avoided uncomfortable truths.

    Continue reading with a Utah Stories subscription. Start your 3-month free trial.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Left in a Box as a Baby: Trauma, Alcoholism, and Addiction

    A man abandoned as a baby builds a structured life in law enforcement, but unresolved trauma and alcoholism slowly begin to unravel it. His story raises a harder question about how change actually happens.


  • The $7 Million Recruit: How NIL Changed College Athletics Forever

    In 2012, Jabari Parker, a top high school prospect and member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was facing his biggest decision to that point in his life: where to play college basketball. 

    Fans of BYU athletics hoped and perhaps prayed that Parker would pick the school owned by the church he was raised in. BYU was listed as one of his final choices. But he ultimately chose to spend his college years at Duke before attempting a career in the NBA. BYU fans were disappointed, but no one was truly surprised. Duke over BYU was the best choice for a young prospect in 2012. 

    A.J. Dybantsa.

    What changed between 2012 and 2024 when A.J. Dybantsa, the number one high school prospect, chose BYU over every other school? The answer is roughly $7 million dollars. That is what Dybantsa is reportedly making to play basketball at BYU. 

    The deal was supported by Utah Jazz owner Ryan Smith, who met multiple times with the Dybantsa family in multiple attempts to bring the young player to Provo. 

    According to Smith, he had no financial role in bringing Dybantsa to BYU, but the influence of Utah’s most famous billionaire acting as a “booster” or unofficial recruiter certainly swayed the decision.

    Prior to 2021, boosters acting as recruiters was taboo to the NCAA governing body. It was called improper recruiting. But in 2021, California began the modern era of NIL, or the ability of a college athlete to benefit from their name, image, or likeness, when they passed the “Fair Pay to Play Act.” 

    This new law gave college athletes in California the ability to benefit from their NIL, something that was banned in the rest of the country to that point. The NCAA saw that this law would create an unfair advantage for California schools that could now give young athletes the chance to make money off their talent and image while still in college. 

    The NCAA knew they needed to do something quickly, so they rushed through a policy that opened up NIL to all college athletes in the country, and it has been expanding and evolving over the last four years. 

    Grant Duff, who has coached at the University of Utah, Weber State University, and is now the defensive coordinator for Idaho State University, says, “The best part of NIL is that athletes have an opportunity to make good money. The downside comes with the free-for-all that money causes.”

    Dybantsa confers with BYU Head coach, Kevin Young.

    One of the biggest current examples of what a school can do when the boosters are willing to pay for success is Texas Tech University. From 2020-2024, Texas Tech had 34 wins, which works out to 6.8 wins per year with a low of 4 wins and high of 8. Then Texas Tech’s boosters got involved, led by Cody Campbell, an oil industry businessman and Chairman of the Texas Tech board. The football program was given 28 million dollars for NIL with a simple message attached to the large pile of money: Win. And win now. And win they did. 

    By signing NIL deals with athletes in the transfer portal, Texas Tech went from a middle-of-the-pack school in their conference to one of the top 12 teams in the country. They didn’t just win games in 2025, they made many of their opponents look like they didn’t belong on the same field, including the University of Utah and BYU twice. That is what money can buy.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Cottonwood Heights Corruption Allegations: A Case That Never Reached a Courtroom

    A year ago, we here at Utah Stories recorded a podcast episode that we never published. We were revisiting corruption allegations from ten years ago. We decided not to publish the video, so it sat there on YouTube for nearly 12 months.

    Then somehow the video was published. How? We are not sure, but once it got out there, the comments came pouring in.

    Dozens of viewers, then hundreds, supported the video with their comments on our examination of allegations of police misconduct in Cottonwood Heights. The video recounts how the Police Department was reported by business owners as focusing enforcement on customers of the former Canyon Inn bar. These allegations did not result in a publicly documented, full investigation by Utah’s Justice Department nor the FBI (at least to our knowledge). So why rehash the past?

    We believe the story of The Canyon Inn (and other area business owners) vs. CHPD and Cottonwood Heights Mayor Kelvin Cullimore raises questions about what can happen when allegations surface and do not move forward through a formal legal process with state or federal oversight.

    In 2012, Cottonwood Heights business owners at the mouth of the canyons began publicly objecting to police activity whereby up to seven cruisers were pulling over 711 and Canyon Inn bar customers on their busiest evenings.

    According to those accounts, drivers leaving the bar were frequently pulled over by police and were given DUI tickets, sometimes even after passing a sobriety examination. The volume and concentration of those stops led residents and business owners to complain about the “heavy-handed treatment” of CHPD toward motorists, especially in and around the Canyon Inn and neighboring 711, and eventually the Porcupine Pub.

    Customers responded in predictable ways. Some chose not to return and avoid the area. Others went to different establishments. Over time, the owner of the Canyon Inn, Jim Stojack, stated that his revenue declined by 70% and that he believed police activity near his business was the main contributing factor.

    Utah Stories reported on these concerns by conducting interviews; gathering video documentation provided by those involved; and making public records requests. Through our GRAMA requests, we reviewed DUI citations issued by the Cottonwood Heights Police Department and examined how those cases were resolved in Holladay Justice Court. During that period, we observed a higher number based on our review of DUI cases dismissed in court due to lack of evidence compared to other jurisdictions. One DUI attorney, Tyler Ayers, went on record saying that CHPD was issuing a high volume of DUI citations that were later dismissed.

    That observation raised questions about how cases were being documented and prosecuted. It did not, on its own, establish intent or misconduct, but it became part of a broader set of concerns raised by multiple sources.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).