Debate

What Would Brigham Young Do? 

Like the days of the Silver Rush in the 1860s, there is a land rush today, and nearly everyone is looking to cash in, especially members of the LDS Community. The question is: “What would Brigham do?” What would he do knowing that the people he led into the Promised Land are now wanting to…

|


With a world-class university named after him, along with a rich and sometimes controversial history, Brigham Young’s large legacy lives on in Utah. 

Brigham Young was the second president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, and has aptly been nicknamed “the Mormon Moses.” Young led the Saints from Nauvoo, Illinois where they were being increasingly persecuted for their beliefs, to the “Promised Land” of the Salt Lake Valley. Young had a clear vision for how the Saints could live a better life than the rest of the nation, which was increasingly being dominated by large banks, tycoons, and industrial powers with harsh working conditions.

Young’s vision was similar to the vision Joseph Smith had laid out and successfully built in Nauvoo, Illinois. But Young’s vision was highly religious and economic in nature. 

Young imagined “The Kingdom of Deseret” to be a highly self-reliant economy, whereby everyone filled a very important and specific role. Missionaries operating in Europe, seeking converts to immigrate to the Great Basin were keenly aware of the specific tradesmen that were required to make Mormon settlements successful. Young had acquired the skills of carpentry, joinery, and mill building. He actively sought Europeans who had skills not only in carpentry and millwork but also masonry, architecture, surveying, and blacksmithing. 

Young was focused on “local industry”. He spoke in sermons about how much he appreciated seeing young girls and boys wearing homespun clothing. He encouraged everyone to spend their precious currency with local merchants and to not buy the extravagances from wagon trains that arrived from the east proffering items such as coffee, tobacco, and liquor.

Young decided that he would make this a mandate, instituting the “Word of Wisdom” as law, prohibiting Saints from imbibing, smoking, or fettering away their money on strong drinks and other useless vices.

Young also prohibited the Saints from engaging in prospecting for silver. As he strongly believed, the greatest value of land and a person’s time, energy and labor, was in farming. “Making the desert blossom as the rose” wasn’t just a pipe-dream. They made it happen. The Pioneer farms and aqueducts provided water to thousands of small farms. The irrigation canals Mormon Pioneers constructed were incredibly well built. Many have stood the test of time. Rural Utah farm towns supported by “Utah’s Fruit Highway” such as Willard and Perry have seen few changes in the infrastructure of irrigation in the past one hundred years. But things are changing today. Water is becoming more scarce.

Many in the LDS Community serve on city councils, and many of our state legislators are land developers. They use their positions of influence to expedite public expenditures that would pad their pockets (such as the proposed gondola up Little Cottonwood Canyon). In Utah, development, not conservation, is king.

Like the days of the Silver Rush in the 1860s, there is a land rush today, and nearly everyone is looking to cash in, especially members of the LDS Community. The question is: “What would Brigham do?” What would he do knowing that the people he led into the Promised Land are now wanting to push farmers out in order to get their development projects underway? What would Brigham do about those who would like to divert water used for farming, which helps Utah to be more self-reliant, to water the grass of tech millionaire mansions instead?

We addressed that subject in the previous issue of Utah Stories Magazine and received a couple dozen comments on Youtube and in our Reddit thread. We believe this is an ongoing discussion that most in high political positions don’t believe is worth having. Let’s get their attention. Please leave your comments on our YouTube channel.

Subscribe to Utah Stories weekly newsletter and get our stories directly to your inbox

* indicates required




nbsp;

,

Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Can Utahns Still Afford to Have Kids?

    When families cannot afford homes near their jobs, the daily math becomes brutal. Commutes stretch longer. Childcare costs pile up. Mortgages consume more of a household’s income. The result is what economists call “house-poor” families—people who technically own a home but have almost nothing left over to live on.

    The obvious question is: why isn’t this being fixed?


  • A Ski Village or a Tipping Point? Nordic Valley Expansion Divides Ogden Valley

    The project, known as Nordic Village, is expected to roll out over the next decade and represents one of the largest tourism developments in the valley’s history.


  • The Stratos Project Was Already Approved. So Why the Public Meeting?

    Thousands showed up to protest. The decision may have already been made.

    When thousands of Box Elder County residents packed the fairgrounds to protest the proposed 40,000-acre Stratos data center, they thought they were confronting the people in charge.

    They weren’t.

    The county commissioners stood at the front of the room, absorbing the anger, the frustration, the disbelief. They looked like decision-makers. But by their own account, they weren’t.

    Because the decision may have already been made—long before the public ever showed up.

    The Illusion of Authority

    What happened at that meeting wasn’t civic engagement. It was something closer to theater.

    No meaningful public comment. No real debate. No clear path for residents to influence the outcome. Just a room full of people reacting to a project that, structurally, may already be locked in.

    Why?

    Because the real authority doesn’t sit with Box Elder County.

    It sits with the Utah Military Installation Development Authority.

    Once MIDA designates a project area, the rules change. Local zoning can become irrelevant. Private land stays private. Water rights remain private. And the role of local government shifts from decision-maker to facilitator.

    In plain terms: the county doesn’t decide if the project happens. It helps manage how it happens.

    So when residents showed up demanding answers, they were asking the wrong people.

    A Process That Skips the Public

    That should concern anyone paying attention.

    Because it flips the normal order of things. Instead of:

    Proposal → Public input → Decision

    We get:

    Decision → Public meeting → Reaction

    And by the time the public enters the room, the real levers of power have already been pulled.

    So what exactly was that meeting?

    If commissioners don’t have authority to stop the project, then the meeting wasn’t about deciding anything. It was about absorbing pressure. Managing optics. Creating the appearance of a process that had already moved on.

    That’s not transparency. That’s choreography.

    Follow the Missing Pieces


  • Ogden Utah: Boomtown, Bargain, or Utah’s Next Unaffordable City?

    With its reinvigorated downtown and close proximity to mountains and river pathways, this northern Utah city is enjoying a renaissance. Ogden’s stock of affordable housing — compared to other metros along the Wasatch Front — currently draws people in for a closer look.