Online Exclusives

The Culture War in America and in Utah

The culture war in America is heating up. There is more vitriolic speech, there is more violence, hatred, and rioting than most young people have ever witnessed

|


The good and the bad of the new social justice warriors

The culture war in America is heating up. There is more vitriolic speech, there is more violence, hatred, and rioting than most young people have ever witnessed. The riot in downtown Salt Lake City a year ago, May 30th, 2020, in front of Library Square after the George Floyd video was released, spoke to the level of anger that even Salt Lakers were feeling. 

The new group of self-described “social justice warriors” march under various banners from “Black Lives Matter” to “Clean our Dirty Air Now!” to “Stop the Polluting Inland Port!” to “Justice for Bernardo.” They are seeking justice for the perceived oppression of mostly ethnic minorities and Black Americans, and they are seeking to have a voice where many feel disenfranchised.

There are some positive developments due to these protests, especially some of the criminal justice and police reforms thanks to Black Lives Matter President Lex Scott and her focus on legal changes in police reform that could hold police departments and individual officers more accountable for unnecessary violence against minorities. 

Scott says, unlike the national organization, Utah’s BLM chapter doesn’t have a “Marxist agenda,” and the organization isn’t led by the national group, but local chapters set their own agenda. But Salt Lake City has seen its share of violence of vitriol mostly due to the growing common belief that so many on the right, Trump supporters, and Republicans are white supremacists.

Some of the most vocal political protests and organizers do not believe that engagement in civil discourse is valid. Many seem now to contend that points of view on the right should be silenced or shut down. 

Back in 2017 Utah Stories covered the protest against Ben Shapiro (who SJWs deemed a “white supremacist”), most didn’t actually know Shapiro, or were familiar with his positions, but were told that he was such by a group called SDS (Students for a Democratic Society). 

SDS was formerly part of the 1960s movement was to facilitate protests on over 300 University Campuses nationwide promoting free speech and opposition to the Vietnam war. Today, they only want to hear from speakers and the values of one particular political party: The far left, and they aren’t shy in showing their disdain for voices on the right.

They attempted to shut down Ben Shapiro from speaking on the campus of the University of Utah in 2017. And today many of their slogans and chants seem to fall in line with Antifa’s sentiments, as seen in a recent protest photo promoted on their Facebook page that reads, “Nazis on our streets, Queers bash back!”.

How did we get here? How did our campuses become battlegrounds against conservative thought and speakers?

In this episode of the Utah Stories Show, we delve into the topic of how the rise of “Postmodernism” taught by many university professors has eroded the civil discourse in America and in Utah. Postmodernists believe that the “grand narratives ” that we have traditionally taught in schools and that have defined America’s story are actually false. That America’s real founding (in 1619), and the slave trade that defined that era, would precipitate the culture of oppression and subjugation of minorities that persists to this day.

Further, new ideas of history, gender, and race are quickly becoming an established curriculum in most Universities in America. Probably the most controversial is Critical Race Theory, which contends that all Whites are inherently racist, and Whites should be aware of their inherent racism and work to become “anti-racists”. These ideas are beginning to be taught even to children in elementary school, as are the ideas of gender fluidity. 

In Our Humble Opinion

Our opinion is that these concepts are corrosive to the fundamental precepts that have made America great. First, Is America a racist country?

One only needs to examine the millions of people around the world with brown or black skin who want to immigrate to the United States to understand that America –while we do have issues of racism–is by-in-large the most tolerant and accepting country on Earth. One only needs to examine the success of African immigrants to see this notion is false. Why would they come here if America were so racist? 

America is the most free society on Earth for individuals who wish to work hard to achieve their dreams. Due to America’s “Great Experiment” freedom and democracy have spread worldwide and have helped lift billions of people out of poverty. More people are being lifted out of poverty, due to the spread of free markets and democracy (see Steven Pinker research), at a faster pace today than ever before.

What is changing in America is a shift in values and perceived “rights”. Whereby our founders believed inalienable rights are endowed to us by our creator: those rights include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. 

Today many leftists believe that “rights” are granted to us by the government, and “rights” should be expanded for the poor, at the expense of liberty for the wealthy. Senator Bernie Sanders is the thought leader of this concept. These new leftists’ ideas believe that the new job of the government is to “solve” the issues of wealth disparity by expanding “rights” to include free education, free healthcare, free housing, and offering a “Universal Basic Income.”

What they fail to communicate or realize is that it is not possible to offer rights or entitlements to anything of monetary value, provided by the government can be given to one person without taking from another person. And in so pushing for rights they are forcing a new kind of class warfare and revolt using the pandemic to allow a huge percentage of Americans to stay home and collect government checks, while we pile up massive amounts of government debt. The burden of this debt will fall squarely on the backs of productive Americans. Will this new model be sustainable? Certainly not. 

The liberty and freedom of the hardest-working Americans must be trampled upon to accomplish these new leftists’ “rights”.  In our next episode on the culture wars in Utah, we will examine the topic of rights, and oppression further.

Editor’s Note:

Utah Stories has always attempted to be non-partisan local news and story provider. We work very hard to provide both sides to politically oriented content and we greatly appreciate all comments that help us to understand the truth and clarify any confusion over positions and ideas, which help facilitate civil discourse.

, ,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Utah Homelessness Crisis: Tyler Clancy Challenges ‘Housing First’ Failures

    “It’s not normal to see someone sleeping on the sidewalk in a sleeping bag with a needle sticking out of their arm.”

    That sentence should not be controversial. In a sane society, it would barely need saying. But in Utah — where politicians, nonprofits, consultants, and bureaucrats have spent more than a decade congratulating themselves for “addressing homelessness” while the streets of Salt Lake have become more dangerous, more drug-soaked, and more morally disorienting — it lands like an indictment. And it came not from a crank, a talk-radio host, or a downtown business owner at the end of his rope, but from Tyler Clancy, Utah’s newly appointed homeless coordinator.

    That matters because if Clancy is serious — and after sitting down with him, he appears to be — then he represents something Utah’s homelessness system has not had in a very long time: someone willing to say the obvious out loud. The old script is dead. Everybody knows it, but almost nobody in power has wanted to admit it. 

    For years, Utah’s homelessness policy has been built on a polite fiction — that if we build enough units, distribute enough funding, and avoid being too “judgmental,” the crisis will gradually resolve itself. That story was easier to maintain when Utah was receiving national praise for “solving chronic homelessness.” It is much harder to sustain now, when the conditions on the ground tell a very different story.

    Magnolia Apartments opened to help alleviate homelessness, but the results were not all positive.

    Part of that failure became painfully clear over the last four years. By most accounts, former homelessness coordinator Wayne Niederhauser was a decent man and a very nice guy. But one person close to him described his tenure as that of “a tiger without stripes”— someone with the title, but not the appetite to challenge the sprawling network of nonprofits and service providers receiving millions in taxpayer dollars. That lack of accountability has had real consequences. Multiple former and current residents have told Utah Stories that of the roughly 60 original tenants who moved into Magnolia when it opened, about 20 have since died — most, they say, from accidental drug overdoses. 

    If those accounts are even close to accurate, they should have triggered a public reckoning. Instead, the system kept moving, protected by good intentions, insulated from scrutiny, and largely unbothered by outcomes that would be considered a scandal in almost any other context.

    That is the machine Clancy is stepping into, and unless he is willing to confront it directly — not just coordinate around it — his role risks becoming one more layer of management over the same failures. The reality he inherits is not complicated in the way policymakers like to suggest. It is visible, immediate, and increasingly impossible to explain away. 

    Open drug use, fentanyl addiction, untreated mental illness, rising disorder, and a growing sense among both the public and the homeless themselves all indicate that the system is not working. Complexity exists, but it has also become a convenient shield for cowardice. It is the language people use when they want to avoid saying what is plainly in front of them: Utah has spent years managing visible human collapse while calling it compassion.

    The Lie Utah Told Itself

    For years, Utah’s approach to homelessness rested on a narrative few in power were willing to question. It sounded compassionate. It polled well. And it avoided uncomfortable truths.

    Continue reading with a Utah Stories subscription. Start your 3-month free trial.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Left in a Box as a Baby: Trauma, Alcoholism, and Addiction

    A man abandoned as a baby builds a structured life in law enforcement, but unresolved trauma and alcoholism slowly begin to unravel it. His story raises a harder question about how change actually happens.


  • Cottonwood Heights Corruption Allegations: A Case That Never Reached a Courtroom

    A year ago, we here at Utah Stories recorded a podcast episode that we never published. We were revisiting corruption allegations from ten years ago. We decided not to publish the video, so it sat there on YouTube for nearly 12 months.

    Then somehow the video was published. How? We are not sure, but once it got out there, the comments came pouring in.

    Dozens of viewers, then hundreds, supported the video with their comments on our examination of allegations of police misconduct in Cottonwood Heights. The video recounts how the Police Department was reported by business owners as focusing enforcement on customers of the former Canyon Inn bar. These allegations did not result in a publicly documented, full investigation by Utah’s Justice Department nor the FBI (at least to our knowledge). So why rehash the past?

    We believe the story of The Canyon Inn (and other area business owners) vs. CHPD and Cottonwood Heights Mayor Kelvin Cullimore raises questions about what can happen when allegations surface and do not move forward through a formal legal process with state or federal oversight.

    In 2012, Cottonwood Heights business owners at the mouth of the canyons began publicly objecting to police activity whereby up to seven cruisers were pulling over 711 and Canyon Inn bar customers on their busiest evenings.

    According to those accounts, drivers leaving the bar were frequently pulled over by police and were given DUI tickets, sometimes even after passing a sobriety examination. The volume and concentration of those stops led residents and business owners to complain about the “heavy-handed treatment” of CHPD toward motorists, especially in and around the Canyon Inn and neighboring 711, and eventually the Porcupine Pub.

    Customers responded in predictable ways. Some chose not to return and avoid the area. Others went to different establishments. Over time, the owner of the Canyon Inn, Jim Stojack, stated that his revenue declined by 70% and that he believed police activity near his business was the main contributing factor.

    Utah Stories reported on these concerns by conducting interviews; gathering video documentation provided by those involved; and making public records requests. Through our GRAMA requests, we reviewed DUI citations issued by the Cottonwood Heights Police Department and examined how those cases were resolved in Holladay Justice Court. During that period, we observed a higher number based on our review of DUI cases dismissed in court due to lack of evidence compared to other jurisdictions. One DUI attorney, Tyler Ayers, went on record saying that CHPD was issuing a high volume of DUI citations that were later dismissed.

    That observation raised questions about how cases were being documented and prosecuted. It did not, on its own, establish intent or misconduct, but it became part of a broader set of concerns raised by multiple sources.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • From LDS Mission to Heroin Addiction: A Utah Man’s Descent and Recovery

    More than 100,000 Americans died from drug overdoses in a single year. That number is often repeated, rarely absorbed, and almost never understood in a way that forces real reflection. Because addiction doesn’t usually look like chaos at the beginning.