Community Relations

Chains Not Interested in Sugar House Decorations

These questions remain: Shouldn’t the large regional and national businesses in the SHBD support the community that supports them? Where will the Santa Shack go at the end of this holiday season, when it must be removed from the Sugarmont Plaza? After 75 years, will Sugar House still have a place for Santa’s House?

|


Illustration by Chris Bodily.

For decades, the Sugar House Chamber of Commerce paid the cost of setting up the iconic Santa House on the Monument Plaza at Christmastime and decorating it with lights and garlands of greenery. Now, the Chamber’s membership has dwindled to less than half, and its income is insufficient to support large public events such as Santa’s arrival or the expense of holiday decorations.

Besides the now privately-owned Santa Shack, the only other holiday decorations in downtown Sugar House will be those put up by area businesses.

When Sugar House merchants first invited the public to “See Santa in Sugar House,” it was a novel contrast to the usual department-store Santa, whose role was to boost the sale of holiday gifts and children’s toys.

“I remember it so well, right there on the Monument island. Mr. Santa Claus was always there, then later Mrs. Santa joined him in a candy-cane striped gazebo. The kids would line up forever to talk to Santa and get a candy cane from him. It was the constant in our Christmas tradition. I think the memory of that experience is so vivid because they always had the best Santas, and he took time with the children,” said Marie Reiter, 83. “[It was] a tradition that really meant something to the children and parents of Sugar House.”

In 2013, plans were made for remodeling the Monument Plaza to accommodate a variety of public activities. When construction began, a new, larger version of the Santa House was relocated to Sugarmont Plaza at 2234 S Highland Drive, the site of the old Deseret Industries building. This is the sixth year that Santa’s house has appeared at that location. About 750 families visited Santa Claus there in 2018, some coming from as far as Tooele and Park City.

In 2015, Salt Lake City Public Services delayed a return to the main plaza while they considered challenges posed by the size of the new Santa Shack and the current configuration of the Monument Plaza. Protecting the surface of the plaza required a crane and a forklift to set the four-ton cottage into position, a cost that neither private sources nor the Chamber could afford. For the past two years, Ascent Construction donated this service, but now they no longer work in the area.

Monique Higginson is the treasurer of the Sugar House Chamber. She said that recent commercial development has resulted in more national businesses in Sugar House. There are fewer small- and middle-sized local concerns to provide the funding and human resources to support traditional Chamber activities.

“Large businesses show little interest in investing in the community. They are not bound to the community in the same way as small businesses,” Higginson said. “It’s perplexing, since they benefit the most from traffic to their stores, restaurants and pubs in downtown Sugar House.”

Sugar House is one of six Chambers along the East Bench that are part of the Wasatch Business Series (WBS), including the City of Holladay, South Salt Lake City, and Murray City. But Sugar House has always been “a city within a city.” Benjamin Sessions, president of the Chamber, said that Sugar House is the only WBS member that is not subsidized by its municipal parent and does not get direct funding from its city.

Another explanation for the lack of funding is that while national chains have replaced some locally-owned stores, ownership of the land may not have changed. In SLC’s Central Business District, cultural events and promotions are funded by the Downtown Alliance, with 40% of their $2.5 million budget coming from a special tax assessment on commercial properties. An effort to organize a similar Sugar House Alliance several years ago was not successful.

These questions remain: Shouldn’t the large regional and national businesses in the SHBD support the community that supports them? Where will the Santa Shack go at the end of this holiday season, when it must be removed from the Sugarmont Plaza? After 75 years, will Sugar House still have a place for Santa’s House?

,

Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • A Ski Village or a Tipping Point? Nordic Valley Expansion Divides Ogden Valley

    The project, known as Nordic Village, is expected to roll out over the next decade and represents one of the largest tourism developments in the valley’s history.


  • Fiddler’s Is Back in Sugar House: Revival of a Neighborhood Favorite

    Walking into Fiddler’s today, longtime patrons will recognize the feeling of the old neighborhood, even though nearly everything else has changed.

    The menu, for one, is tight, intentional, and scratch-made. “We created a simpler menu where we utilize most of our ingredients between different dishes,” Jordanna explains. “You can’t waste anything.”

    Everything is made thoughtfully and often gluten-free by default.


  • The End of an Era? FanX and the Salt Palace Closure

    For more than a decade, FanX has called the Salt Palace home. With the convention center set to close for a massive renovation, founder Dan Farr is preparing for a new chapter while planning one final celebration in its longtime venue.


  • The Stratos Project and Corporate Power: Who Controls Utah’s Future?

    If we were all just consumers, Governor Cox, Mike Lee, Speaker Schultz, and Kevin O’Leary would have it easy. If we were just more concerned about money, jobs, and tech, and less concerned about raising our kids in communities (not in front of screens), culture, the environment, and water, those smart dudes would get exactly what they want — Stratos: a city of the future, buzzing with processors and transistors, making all of our AI dreams come true! 

    The world we could live in would be a dazzling, Mr. Wonderful kind of place. We would beat those pesky Chinese in the AI war; our AI robots could do all of our farming and ostensibly harvest the water we need for the Great Salt Lake out of thin air. But apparently, we just don’t get it. We haven’t yet reached the point predicted by Aldous Huxley’s vision in Brave New World, where we are completely distracted, dopamine-driven consumers who only need sex, drugs, and stuff to remain happy.

    Maybe Stratos will be an amazing marvel, and somehow, as Governor Cox claims, “. . . add more water to the Great Salt Lake.” But we aren’t sold. While this Stratos project has received considerable attention, it’s worth taking a step back to attempt to understand how corporate power appears to have usurped civic power.

    Civics is the practice of shaping our society through our collective voices and community involvement. Ask the residents in Tremonton, Utah how well that is working out for them. Can we still shape our world through our elected leaders? Does it matter who we vote for at the ballot box if organizations like UDOT, UTA, and MIDA can supersede our local government authority and citizen backlash? 

    The corporatization of our communities and the interests that impact our political leaders’ decision making processes are seen as far more of a concern than the average Utah resident’s concerns. Special interests and corporate power are shaping Utah’s future more than ever. 

    It’s worth asking: ‘How can we regain control over shaping Utah’s future in light of the growing power and billions that the technocrats now wield in shaping our world today?’ Amazon’s market cap exceeds the GDP of Canada. The “Magnificent Seven” tech stocks now have a greater market cap than the entire GDP of Europe ($23.6 trillion. EU countries have $19.3 trillion GDP). Will tech companies become their own nation-states and dominate their own chunks of various states? Will we become their subjects?

    There are two sides to this coin: We love Utah not just because we have the most outdoor wilderness playgrounds, but also because of Utah’s prosperity and job market. This is because Utah has become a tech hub. Our tech leadership has minted several billionaires and billion-dollar businesses. Utah offers a market and an educated workforce that more businesses and giant corporations want to be a part of. This is a benefit for even non-tech Utahns.

    The problem with this success is that as we dole out more money to attract more tech businesses, data centers, fulfillment centers, and big corporate retailers, it becomes more difficult to carve out our “sense of community.” As corporate sovereignty replaces local business sovereignty, we see that our voices and our votes matter less.

    Ask who our politicians work for, and nearly every Utahn believes they work far more for their corporate donors than they work for the average Utah citizen. So how do we best regain control over our communities?

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).