Development Projects

Moab’s Affordable Housing—Is There Hope?

One might deduce that there is an affordable housing crisis when stories are circulated of working adults living with their parents, camped out on public lands and in the yards of friends and co-workers; house-sharing; and business owners housing workers in Airstreams and single-wide trailers.

|


Interns with Community Rebuilds applying exterior plaster on one of the two current homes being built at the corner of Mill Creek Road and Sandflats Road. Community Rebuilds is a Moab local non-profit whose mission is to “build energy-efficient housing, provide education on sustainability, and improve the housing conditions of the workforce through an affordable program.” Photo courtesy of Shannan Butler

Moab & Housing

One might deduce that there is an affordable housing crisis when stories are circulated of working adults living with their parents, camped out on public lands and in the yards of friends and co-workers; house-sharing; and business owners housing workers in Airstreams and single-wide trailers.

The US Department of Housing and Urban Development states that affordable housing is when a family spends less than 30% of their income on rent or a mortgage and other fees related to housing. A large portion of residents in Grand County, according to the Moab Area Housing Plan, spend more than 30% of their income on housing. The workforce of Moab consists of 55.80% tourism industry workers who earn an average of $27,744 annually, but the average cost of a home is currently $403,983.00 (2019 second quarter) making it next to impossible for the average resident in Moab to afford to buy.

What is the City of Moab doing about its affordable housing dilemma? There are currently three projects that the community in and around Moab are working on to assist Grand County’s low and middle-wage earners to find affordable places to live. The hope is to at least bring the count of affordable housing units to 400 or more by the year 2030.

Walnut Hill

The city of Moab is planning a proposed mixed-income rental development on Walnut Lane, which will construct around 80 units with affordable housing. These units will include between 300 – 900 square foot units ranging from studio apartments to three-bedroom apartments. Newly contracted Senior Projects Manager, Kaitlin Myers said, “Since the city purchased the property last year, one of the highest priorities has been to not displace any of the residents during the development process, so the primary challenge with this first phase is to identify the best place to start—to identify a “hole,” if you will, to build some higher density housing for the current residents to move into to make room for later phases on the site.”

When asked for an estimated guess of when construction would begin, City of Moab’s Communications and Engagement Manager said, “We don’t have a specific date for when design and construction will begin, but the goal is to get the first phase underway as soon as possible and to do so while maintaining our pledge to not displace the current residents.”

Arroyo Crossing

Arroyo Crossing is MACLT: Moab Area Community Land Trust, a 41-acre housing development consisting of three community facilities totaling 300 units will be built containing 1, 2 and 3-bedroom apartment units, single-family homes, duplex units, townhouses, and cottages.

According to the chair of MACLT, Audrey Graham, the number and type of units that the project will ultimately have will be determined as the development reaches its final stage. Graham said, “The project is going amazingly. We will put in the infrastructure in the coming year.” Graham further said there would most likely be about 20 single-family homes built in 2020 as well.

Graham explained that development was going to occur in stages and land may look like it’s not being developed, but advises that MACLT is being selective and will be looking for contractors and developers who develop sustainable housing. There will be homes for sale and for rent, but they will only be available to workers who live, work and have retired in Grand County and northern San Juan County.

Wingate Village

Construction is underway on the 33 total units by the Housing Authority of Southern Utah called Wingate Village, which will consist of 11 single-family units built under the housing authority’s Mutual Self Help (MSH) program, and there will also be 22 affordable townhome rentals.

Although the proposed units soon to be in development will put a dent in the current housing crisis in Moab, the Moab Area Housing Plan has projected the number of housing units at multiple pricing levels will increase to over 1,000 units by the year 2030.

, ,

Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Moab’s Off-Road Legend Dan Mick: Inside Hell’s Revenge and the Fight for Public Land Access

    The story of Moab’s off-road world isn’t just about machines. It’s about the people who have shaped this place — people like Dan Mick, who has spent a lifetime climbing impossible angles and helping others experience the wonder of the slickrock and the trails.


  • A Ski Village or a Tipping Point? Nordic Valley Expansion Divides Ogden Valley

    The project, known as Nordic Village, is expected to roll out over the next decade and represents one of the largest tourism developments in the valley’s history.


  • Inside Moab’s Political Divide: Land, Tourism, and the Future of Grand County, Utah

    In the late 1950s, Edward Abbey took a job as a park ranger at Arches National Monument, just outside Moab. What he found there, and what he watched happen to it, would shape the rest of his life. Roads were being cut into the canyon country. Cars were replacing foot traffic. The National Park Service, in the name of accessibility, was engineering a kind of industrialization of the wilderness he’d come to love. Abbey wrote about it in Desert Solitaire, published in 1968, and the anger in that book wasn’t abstract. It came from watching something specific be changed by people who either didn’t understand what they had or didn’t care.

    Grand County has long been the most reliably left-leaning county in the state, a fact that puts it in sharp contrast to nearly everything around it. To understand how that happened, and where things stand now, I spoke with longtime residents and politicians who’ve watched it from the inside, people who’ve served in local government and lived through the shifts firsthand.

    Robert Greenberg.

    Bob Greenberg came from New York in 1976, took a job at the community mental health center, and never left. He went on to chair the Grand County Democratic Party and serve on the county council. When he arrived, he said, “the Democratic Party was said to be able to meet in a phone booth” — and even then, its members were a contradictory bunch. Yellow Dog Democrats from the oil patch were fiscally conservative but surprisingly open socially, allowing different demographics to feel safe moving to the county. 

    “The town fathers were desperate to have new people come to town,” Greenberg recalls. “They just didn’t want the people who actually showed up. They wanted some other people.”

    What followed was a demographic shift nobody planned. The people who filled the gap left by the bust were river guides, federal agency workers, artists, and eventually waves of outdoor recreationists discovering that southeastern Utah was among the most spectacular landscapes on earth. Tourism ended up being the only economic development avenue that actually worked. Manufacturing never had the labor force or market access, sewing factories came and went. The people the tourist economy attracted tended to be younger, more outdoor-oriented, and more liberal.

    Kevin Walker.

    Kevin Walker, a former Grand County commissioner who moved here in 1990 for the landscape, puts the county’s diversity in context. “Moab [is] a pretty diverse place since, I think, at least the 1950s with the uranium mining boom,” he says. “So it’s not a typical Southern Utah town.” 

    Part of what makes Grand County distinct is self-reinforcing. Federal agencies like the Park Service, the Forest Service, the BLM, have large presences here and pull in a different demographic than surrounding counties. People looking to live in Southern Utah with certain values gravitate toward the place where those values already have a foothold. Over time, that critical mass has made Grand County what it is politically, while neighboring counties went in very different directions.

    The defining conflict in Grand County has always been over land.

    In the 1970s and 80s, it was extraction versus preservation in the starkest terms. County commissioners floated toxic waste incinerators. A plan emerged to site a high-level nuclear waste repository at the entrance to Canyonlands National Park. 

    “It really, really galvanized environmentalists everywhere, but particularly in Grand County,” Greenberg says. Activists put up signs at the park entrance, watched them get chainsawed down, and came back with steel reinforcement. That stubborn, physical, unglamorous persistence became part of the local political character.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • The Stratos Project Was Already Approved. So Why the Public Meeting?

    Thousands showed up to protest. The decision may have already been made.

    When thousands of Box Elder County residents packed the fairgrounds to protest the proposed 40,000-acre Stratos data center, they thought they were confronting the people in charge.

    They weren’t.

    The county commissioners stood at the front of the room, absorbing the anger, the frustration, the disbelief. They looked like decision-makers. But by their own account, they weren’t.

    Because the decision may have already been made—long before the public ever showed up.

    The Illusion of Authority

    What happened at that meeting wasn’t civic engagement. It was something closer to theater.

    No meaningful public comment. No real debate. No clear path for residents to influence the outcome. Just a room full of people reacting to a project that, structurally, may already be locked in.

    Why?

    Because the real authority doesn’t sit with Box Elder County.

    It sits with the Utah Military Installation Development Authority.

    Once MIDA designates a project area, the rules change. Local zoning can become irrelevant. Private land stays private. Water rights remain private. And the role of local government shifts from decision-maker to facilitator.

    In plain terms: the county doesn’t decide if the project happens. It helps manage how it happens.

    So when residents showed up demanding answers, they were asking the wrong people.

    A Process That Skips the Public

    That should concern anyone paying attention.

    Because it flips the normal order of things. Instead of:

    Proposal → Public input → Decision

    We get:

    Decision → Public meeting → Reaction

    And by the time the public enters the room, the real levers of power have already been pulled.

    So what exactly was that meeting?

    If commissioners don’t have authority to stop the project, then the meeting wasn’t about deciding anything. It was about absorbing pressure. Managing optics. Creating the appearance of a process that had already moved on.

    That’s not transparency. That’s choreography.

    Follow the Missing Pieces