Utah Stories

What Are The Causes of Utah’s Opiate Addiction Epidemic?

Bill (name changed) was a bright and happy kid who loved his family and life. He grew up, got married, had a successful career and bought a house. He had two beautiful children. Then a few years ago he was in an accident that left him in pain. He was prescribed pain pills and became…

|


Bill (name changed) was a bright and happy kid who loved his family and life. He grew up, got married, had a successful career and bought a house. He had two beautiful children. Then a few years ago he was in an accident that left him in pain. He was prescribed pain pills and became addicted. He lost his family and home as he came to care about the drug more than anything else in his life.

Two weeks ago he was found dead in his tiny apartment from a heroin overdose. How did he get from there to here?

Part of the answer is the growing epidemic of addiction to prescribed opioids. Years ago he was in an accident that left him in pain. Bill had a doctor who prescribed him monthly refills until he died. He sold part of his prescription each month for income and started using heroin to get high because it was cheaper, lots cheaper.

We spoke with Christina Zidow for some insight into the problem. Christina is the Chief Operating Officer for Odyssey House and a licensed clinical social worker therapist. She oversees the programming operations, including everything from evidence based practices to therapeutic practices for seven behavioral health programs in 13 locations in Utah and Las Vegas.

The problem in Utah is huge. Zidow referred to a May 2014 study printed in Obstetrics and Gynecology that looked at opioids prescribed to a pregnant, Medicaid population between 2000 and 2007. Utah had one of the highest rates, at 41.6% of pregnant women receiving an opioid prescription. Twice the national average which is 21.6%.

Zidow concludes, “This percentage indicates an issue of prescribing practices in Utah, especially looking at the study population with not only addiction potential, but problems for the fetus.”

Why do doctors keep prescribing and overprescribing such dangerous drugs? One answer is that doctors want to take care of their patients. They prescribe pills to help people manage pain. There is a perception in our culture that pain should always be relieved and doctors are always happy to relieve their patients’ pain. We should never be in pain so we go to the doctor looking for relief.

An additional reason is retention and compensation. Health facilities ask patients to rate doctors for the care they receive. Physicians’ ratings determine both compensation and retention. And according to Zidow, the greatest factor of an overall good rating is pain managements. She says, “We are incentivizing the wrong things.”

Another hurdle to overcome, according to Zidow, is lobbying by the American Medical Association and Utah Medical Association. Each year the major medical groups fight legislation that would mandate doctors to check a patient’s prescription records. Currently patients can doctor shop without much trouble. Zidow says, “Doctors don’t want to take the time, but isn’t five minutes worth a kid’s life?”

According to Zidow, opioid addiction is dangerous because, “It feels good to get high, but coming down is awful. After a certain point it is not even about getting high anymore, but about not getting sick. This behavior cycle is reinforced by the avoidance of discomfort and the fact that opioid addiction alters the way your pain senses work and the body becomes hypersensitive to any pain.” When people can longer get pain pills “legitimately” they turn to the street where prices are $1 a milligram. That works out to $30 for a 30 milligram pill. Not to mention the dangerous look-alike pills manufactured to pass for the real thing. These copy cats are usually laced with fentanyl, a very dangerous substance. Zidow says, “One pill may have a tiny bit of fentanyl, but the next pill may have a huge amount and the person who takes it will die in a couple of seconds.”

One solution to the problem is education for doctors and the general public. According to Zidow, University of Utah Health Care and Intermountain Healthcare are taking steps to educate their health care providers. Instead of pulling out the prescription pad, physicians are telling their patients, “You just had surgery. You are going to be uncomfortable for a couple of weeks. Take some Ibuprofen, use a hot pad, go to your physical therapy, because you don’t need to spend the next years of your life addicted to pain medication.”

As for the community, it is a matter of increasing awareness. Besides just changing the way that doctors prescribe drugs patients need to be aware of the risk factors associated with drug use. It is getting away from the notion that if a doctor prescribes something it must be safe. Dealing with pain is better than dealing with addiction. It is campaigns such as Use Only As Directed and safe prescription disposal programs.

There are alternatives for pain. There are medications that are less addictive and work differently. Some of those, such as muscle relaxants, can also be addictive, as the patient builds a tolerance. But they are not as ferocious as opioids.

Over the counter medications, Ibuprofen and Tylenol, are better choices, as well as heating pads, physical therapy, and muscle rubs. Patients and healthcare providers are also starting to look at pain control through alternative methods like yoga, meditation, and acupuncture.

By shifting expectations about pain, and exploring education about addiction and addiction potential, we can fight a very real threat. We can keep ourselves—and our loved ones—safe.

Related article: Inside Heroin Addiction and Homelessness in Salt Lake City

 

, , ,


Join our newsletter.
Stay informed.


  • Left in a Box as a Baby: Trauma, Alcoholism, and Addiction

    A man abandoned as a baby builds a structured life in law enforcement, but unresolved trauma and alcoholism slowly begin to unravel it. His story raises a harder question about how change actually happens.


  • Utah Official’s $36K Travel Reimbursements Raise Questions About Use of Taxpayer Funds

    The trek into the office is a necessary evil for many employees; unpaid time that could be spent elsewhere. But some state employees are able to cash in on their commutes.

    That includes one member of Gov. Spencer Cox’s cabinet who heads the Utah Department of Cultural & Community Engagement. The department oversees a number of civic and social programs ranging from museums, libraries and the state historical society, to volunteerism efforts and multicultural affairs. 

    The employee’s in-state travel expenses made up a large chunk of the department’s employee reimbursements in recent years, according to documents obtained by The Utah Investigative Journalism Project obtained through a public records request. 

    The UIJP reviewed spreadsheets detailing the reimbursed expenses of the department’s 17-person leadership team over the 2024 and 2025 fiscal years. 

    The analysis showed one employee, Executive Director Donna Law, accounted for nearly a third of the team’s reimbursements in 2024 and 43% in 2025. Law, who lives in Cedar City, spent more than 11 times the average amount spent by all other employees included in the analysis. 

    The majority of Law’s expenses were categorized as in-state travel, which includes mileage and lodging. Between the two years, she spent $21,607.94 on lodging, $10,135.42  on auto mileage, and $1,455.00 in miscellaneous travel expenses and meals for a total of over $33,000. 

    The next highest amount spent on in-state travel was $3,385. Law’s overall spending far exceeded any other employee.

    The nearly $36,000 Law spent on travel and other items wasnearly three times that spent by the employee with the second highest amount in reimbursements. His expenses, in contrast, were largely out-of-state travel.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • The $7 Million Recruit: How NIL Changed College Athletics Forever

    In 2012, Jabari Parker, a top high school prospect and member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was facing his biggest decision to that point in his life: where to play college basketball. 

    Fans of BYU athletics hoped and perhaps prayed that Parker would pick the school owned by the church he was raised in. BYU was listed as one of his final choices. But he ultimately chose to spend his college years at Duke before attempting a career in the NBA. BYU fans were disappointed, but no one was truly surprised. Duke over BYU was the best choice for a young prospect in 2012. 

    A.J. Dybantsa.

    What changed between 2012 and 2024 when A.J. Dybantsa, the number one high school prospect, chose BYU over every other school? The answer is roughly $7 million dollars. That is what Dybantsa is reportedly making to play basketball at BYU. 

    The deal was supported by Utah Jazz owner Ryan Smith, who met multiple times with the Dybantsa family in multiple attempts to bring the young player to Provo. 

    According to Smith, he had no financial role in bringing Dybantsa to BYU, but the influence of Utah’s most famous billionaire acting as a “booster” or unofficial recruiter certainly swayed the decision.

    Prior to 2021, boosters acting as recruiters was taboo to the NCAA governing body. It was called improper recruiting. But in 2021, California began the modern era of NIL, or the ability of a college athlete to benefit from their name, image, or likeness, when they passed the “Fair Pay to Play Act.” 

    This new law gave college athletes in California the ability to benefit from their NIL, something that was banned in the rest of the country to that point. The NCAA saw that this law would create an unfair advantage for California schools that could now give young athletes the chance to make money off their talent and image while still in college. 

    The NCAA knew they needed to do something quickly, so they rushed through a policy that opened up NIL to all college athletes in the country, and it has been expanding and evolving over the last four years. 

    Grant Duff, who has coached at the University of Utah, Weber State University, and is now the defensive coordinator for Idaho State University, says, “The best part of NIL is that athletes have an opportunity to make good money. The downside comes with the free-for-all that money causes.”

    Dybantsa confers with BYU Head coach, Kevin Young.

    One of the biggest current examples of what a school can do when the boosters are willing to pay for success is Texas Tech University. From 2020-2024, Texas Tech had 34 wins, which works out to 6.8 wins per year with a low of 4 wins and high of 8. Then Texas Tech’s boosters got involved, led by Cody Campbell, an oil industry businessman and Chairman of the Texas Tech board. The football program was given 28 million dollars for NIL with a simple message attached to the large pile of money: Win. And win now. And win they did. 

    By signing NIL deals with athletes in the transfer portal, Texas Tech went from a middle-of-the-pack school in their conference to one of the top 12 teams in the country. They didn’t just win games in 2025, they made many of their opponents look like they didn’t belong on the same field, including the University of Utah and BYU twice. That is what money can buy.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).


  • Cottonwood Heights Corruption Allegations: A Case That Never Reached a Courtroom

    A year ago, we here at Utah Stories recorded a podcast episode that we never published. We were revisiting corruption allegations from ten years ago. We decided not to publish the video, so it sat there on YouTube for nearly 12 months.

    Then somehow the video was published. How? We are not sure, but once it got out there, the comments came pouring in.

    Dozens of viewers, then hundreds, supported the video with their comments on our examination of allegations of police misconduct in Cottonwood Heights. The video recounts how the Police Department was reported by business owners as focusing enforcement on customers of the former Canyon Inn bar. These allegations did not result in a publicly documented, full investigation by Utah’s Justice Department nor the FBI (at least to our knowledge). So why rehash the past?

    We believe the story of The Canyon Inn (and other area business owners) vs. CHPD and Cottonwood Heights Mayor Kelvin Cullimore raises questions about what can happen when allegations surface and do not move forward through a formal legal process with state or federal oversight.

    In 2012, Cottonwood Heights business owners at the mouth of the canyons began publicly objecting to police activity whereby up to seven cruisers were pulling over 711 and Canyon Inn bar customers on their busiest evenings.

    According to those accounts, drivers leaving the bar were frequently pulled over by police and were given DUI tickets, sometimes even after passing a sobriety examination. The volume and concentration of those stops led residents and business owners to complain about the “heavy-handed treatment” of CHPD toward motorists, especially in and around the Canyon Inn and neighboring 711, and eventually the Porcupine Pub.

    Customers responded in predictable ways. Some chose not to return and avoid the area. Others went to different establishments. Over time, the owner of the Canyon Inn, Jim Stojack, stated that his revenue declined by 70% and that he believed police activity near his business was the main contributing factor.

    Utah Stories reported on these concerns by conducting interviews; gathering video documentation provided by those involved; and making public records requests. Through our GRAMA requests, we reviewed DUI citations issued by the Cottonwood Heights Police Department and examined how those cases were resolved in Holladay Justice Court. During that period, we observed a higher number based on our review of DUI cases dismissed in court due to lack of evidence compared to other jurisdictions. One DUI attorney, Tyler Ayers, went on record saying that CHPD was issuing a high volume of DUI citations that were later dismissed.

    That observation raised questions about how cases were being documented and prosecuted. It did not, on its own, establish intent or misconduct, but it became part of a broader set of concerns raised by multiple sources.

    Continue reading and support independent Utah journalism with a purchase of Utah Stories (Digital + Print) or 3 month free trial (Digital).